Hi Folks,
I see this error while booting into BSD and I presume this might be the
problem that acpi on my TP does not work.
The errors are something like this.
acpi0: IBMTP-1Gon motherboard
Using $PIR table, 14 entries at 0xc00fdeb0
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
As you eloquently state, there are a number of tradeoffs involved. On
a 64-bit platform, 99% of users are paying 40 bytes/pkt for something
that they will never use. On x86, 99.99% of users are paying 20
bytes/pkt for a feature they will never
Sun Nov 24 01:00:03 PST 2002
...
U release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware/alpha/proc-alpha.sgml
? sys/alpha/conf/LINT
U sys/cam/scsi/scsi_cd.c
U sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c
U sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c
U sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.c
U sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c
U sys/dev/pccbb/pccbbreg.h
U sys/i386/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c
I've never ever needed to cleanup lib. Are you sure that's absolutely
required? Also, for upgrading from 4.x already has the bit about
nuking /usr/include/gcc. I've never needed to do more. What
libraries are bad that need to be removed, specifically? Or is this
just paranoia inspired?
Hi,
Fairly new current system. Brand new KDE built from ports. Crashes
immediately I press the k start button.
Kcrash reports:
0x28f37893 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5
#0 0x28f37893 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5
#1 0x28ee1221 in _thread_kern_sched_state_unlock () from
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:06:52PM -0800, Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But who will bell the cat? I vote for Snuffles.
Don't understand. Some inside joke or something based on US centric
TV? What are you trying to tell me? Remember I'm not native.
1930's/1940's cartoon
Hello,
I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need
to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode.
I did a search and tried some syntax like 0 for the irq etc. but no
way to put something in polled mode or to find an info on it.
It's a lack of
Hackers,
on yesterday's -current i see
ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
ACPI-1354: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR
this is IBM ThinkPad 390x laptop. dmesg and acpidump are attached.
any ideas?
thanks
max
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD
Hi!
I don't get very far when trying FreeBSD 5.0-DP2. Everything starts up OK
but when trying to write down my partition information the box freezes...
After awhile it reboots. The box is a Dual AMD 1400+ MP, with 512 DDR RAM,
IDE 40 GB (IBM). Tyan Tiger mothboard and a Intel 107100 NIC (fxp).
Hello there,
As UFS2 is not backward compatible at all, I wonder why the old fstype in
disklabel is being kept:
#size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
a: 102400004.2BSD 2048 16384 64008 # (Cyl.0 - 63*)
c: 186103260unused0 0
Sun Nov 24 13:00:02 PST 2002
? sys/alpha/conf/LINT
U sys/boot/efi/loader/main.c
U sys/conf/options.ia64
U sys/ia64/ia64/machdep.c
U sys/ia64/ia64/mca.c
U sys/ia64/include/cpu.h
cvs [update aborted]: cannot make directory include: File exists
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Julian Elischer writes:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
As you eloquently state, there are a number of tradeoffs involved. On
a 64-bit platform, 99% of users are paying 40 bytes/pkt for something
that they will never use. On x86, 99.99% of users are paying 20
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
If we're going to nitpick the mbuf system, a much, much worse problem
is that you cannot allocate an mbuf chain w/o holding Giant, which
stems from the mbuf system eventually calling kmem_malloc(). This
effectively prevents any network driver
Maybe I am missing something, but...
On my -CURRENT box (current as of last night). After a fresh install (no
tinkering with settings), when I use ssh to connect from a remote host, I
get the following error:
sshd[pid]: /var/log/lastlog: Permission denied
Also, the following processes are
Hi
I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD
Current) and installed that one with pkg_add.
Ok, that one went fine.
But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I get an Segmentation fault, and
a wrote:
Hi
I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD Current) and installed that one with pkg_add.
Ok, that one went fine.
But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I get an Segmentation fault,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, a wrote:
Hi
I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD
Current) and installed that one with pkg_add.
Ok, that one went fine.
But after that, i was not able to start OpenOffice. I
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Hi,
just a question to the possibilies using 5.0-RELEASE. In the early
adopters guide (chapter 1) it's written, that 5.0-RELEASE should be as
stable as possible to getting a large number of users to test. But if
it's not recommented to use it in production environments, what test
results do
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 05:09:19PM -0500, John Von Essen wrote:
Like I said, this is a fresh install with no config changes. Any ideas as
to what is going on?
This is a known problem.
Kris
msg47387/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 22 November 2002 09.03, David Holm wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to build world since yesterday, doing cvsup's inbetween hopi=
ng
for a fix. But it always fails on bin/cat with a bunch of unresolvable
pthread symbols at linking. I have cleared out my old /usr/obj.
cat cat.o
On 2002-11-24 23:33 +, Yann Berthier wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, a wrote:
Hi
I am running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (22 Nov 22:52 CET)
I did a download of a precompiled OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 package (it is for FreeBSD
Current) and installed that one with pkg_add.
Ok, that one went fine.
Hi,
I can reproducable panic todays CURRENT by running ifconfig xl0 up
(My rl0 NIC works fine). The xl0 NIC works on STABLE.
Any help/ideas appreciated.
regards
tilman
polly# ifconfig xl0 up
panic: invalid ife-ifm_data (0x6000) in mii_phy_setmedia
Debugger(panic)
Stopped at
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 05:06:05PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Chad David wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:19:43AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
Perhaps because maintaining them in the FreeBSD repo might be the wrong
place. To answer your other questiion -- because a change to fix one
Hi, Poul-Henning
This is my DP2 box's info about 'GEOM' when power on with 'boot -v'.
GEOM: new disk da0
GEOM: new disk da1
GEOM: new disk da2
MBR Slice 1 on da0:
80 01 01 00 a5 fe ff 7b 3f 00 00 00 3d a8 da 00 |...{?...=...|
[0] f:80 typ:165 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):123/254/255 s:63
On Tuesday Nov 26th I plan to make an update to the UFS2
superblock. It will not affect UFS1 filesystems so should
be generally transparent to most -current users. For those
using UFS2 filesystems, the new kernel will update the
superblock to the new format the first time that your UFS2
filesystem
[ ... Objective C ... ]
Chad David wrote:
And I thought this thread was dead :).
It just showed up in the inbox last night; it must have been stuck
in your mail server. Sorry about that.
I don't really feel a need to convince. If people are too busy (or
just do not care) to maintain ObjC
I do have one question re: UFS2, not specifically about this change
however..
I notice that the fields of the disk structure are signed.
Wouldn;t it make more sence at this early stage to declare them as
unsigned?
For example
take this snippet from struct fs
int64_t fs_size;
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Dan Lukes wrote:
The problem you hit is that the pthread stub functions as declared
within src/lib/libc/gen/_pthread_stubs.c are optimized-out by -O3
causing undefined symbol errors later during build. I don't know if it
is gcc's optimiser bug or there is something
Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not
(for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes). So just
going through and making everything unsigned is not the right
approach. I will make a pass through and consider changing some
of these fields once the tree opens back up,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently updating some part of the Handbook for 5.X, and I need
to know how to put some ports like sio0 or ppc0 in polled mode.
I did a search and tried some syntax like 0 for the irq etc. but no
way to put something in polled mode or
Hi,
you can find it on http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/.
At Mon, 25 Nov 2002 06:09:09 + (GMT),
Daniel Flickinger wrote:
package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on
snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on
OpenOffice.org...
where does it reside?
I would
On 2002-11-25 06:09 +, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on
snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on
OpenOffice.org...
where does it reside?
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
I would compile it, but I would need to reorganize
Hi.
Daniel Flickinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 25.11.2002, 07:09:09:
package OpenOffice 1.0.1_4 is not available on
snapshot and there is no FreeBSD copy on
OpenOffice.org...
where does it reside?
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
But, i tried to install that package
On 2002-11-25 08:30 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/
But, i tried to install that package on my FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT, well it
went fine, but when i try to run openoffice, i will get a Segmentation
fault.
Hope you will have more luck.
As it says in the
35 matches
Mail list logo
