Re: VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR?

2003-01-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:48:15PM -0800, walt wrote: After updating world and kernel this evening I saw this message fly by during the reboot: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR : 0xc25fd000: tag none, type VCHR, usecount 5, writecount 0, refcount 6, flags

Re: troubles with realplay-er

2003-01-05 Thread David Holm
MPlayer plays these streams perfectly here. On Sunday 05 January 2003 01:29, Mikhail Teterin wrote: This Linux program used to work well, but now it crashes (with SIGABRT) some URLs, such as pnm://rm.content.loudeye.com/~iii-600111/0255135_0101_00_0002.ra

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:00:26PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: === usr.bin/vi *** Error code 1 (ignored) *** Error code 1 (ignored) === usr.bin/vis ... No; it would be more profitable to teach programmers to not ignore errors. whereintheworld is perfectly non-broken in not ignoring

Re: Rather verbose ACPI errors.

2003-01-05 Thread Peter Wemm
David O'Brien wrote: Ever since the last ACPI import, I get all this output (non-verbose) boot. What's the change on them going away soon? acpi0: PTLTDRSDT on motherboard ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [Z00Q] in

Re: VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR?

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes: After updating world and kernel this evening I saw this message fly by during the reboot: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR : 0xc25fd000: tag none, type VCHR, usecount 5, writecount 0, refcount 6, flags (VV_OBJBUF), Sorry, need

nVidia opengl works as root but not as user

2003-01-05 Thread David Holm
Hi, it's getting boring seeing all the nvidia posts but I'm so darn close to having it working here. I have disabled INVARIANTS in the kernel and AGP and running with nvAgp (although I get the same results using kernel agp as well). The thing is that OpenGL apps run perfectly as root, but

Re: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Robert Watson wrote: Juli Mallett pointed me at the following reproduceable problem on my -current notebook with userland/kernel dated Dec 29: paprika:~/freebsd/test/pthread ./test ... load: 0.23 cmd: test 914 [running] 0.00u 0.01s 0% 824k 1 Bus error (core dumped)

LOR - inp / tcp

2003-01-05 Thread ryan beasley
-CURRENT from December 28th, 4:00 -0600. Triggered immediately after launching /usr/sbin/rpcbind -l -s /sbin/mountd -l /sbin/nfsd -n4 -t -u (This is the first time this has happened with that combination of operations.) The only kernel modules loaded are vesa, miibus, and if_dc. Sun Jan

Re: VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR?

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes: After updating world and kernel this evening I saw this message fly by during the reboot: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR : 0xc25fd000: tag none, type VCHR, usecount 5,

Re: Q) Does perl install libperl.so ?

2003-01-05 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.01.05 12:52:03 +, Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote: /usr/ports/lang/perl5 seemingly does not generate libperl.so with FreeBSD-current port as shown below. Is it intended one? Why? This was discussed on the ports list a while ago :

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: current/stable remote gdb interoperability

2003-01-05 Thread ryan beasley
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:32:43AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: Another possible problem is using the same serial line for gdb as for the console and mixing speeds. If the userland speed differs from the low level speed, then the i/o routines switch back and forth between the speeds for every

kernel compile bloat

2003-01-05 Thread Andy Farkas
Why does compiling a kernel (make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC) take 7 times as much space on 5.0-current than it does on 4.7-stable? On a 4.7-stable box, /usr/obj/usr/src/sys totals 34 MB. On a 5.0-current box, /usr/obj/usr/src/sys totals 270 MB! (for each box, I rm /usr/obj/*, make

Re: Q) Does perl install libperl.so ?

2003-01-05 Thread Yamada Ken Takeshi
Thank you, Simon for your response with pointer. I think I overlooked these as I did not care about then. I read through articles you pointed, but couldn't find the conclusion. What was the outcome of the discussion? or, still pending? I am now wrecked at 'plperl' installation as it is

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-05 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Sun, 2003/01/05 at 01:33:14 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:00:26PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: === usr.bin/vi *** Error code 1 (ignored) *** Error code 1 (ignored) === usr.bin/vis .. No; it would be more profitable to teach programmers to not ignore

Panic when using Wine

2003-01-05 Thread Munehiro Matsuda
Hi all, I got following panic, while trying to run Wine (ver.2002.12.19). ---8--8--8--8--8--8--8--8--8--- Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR : 0xc197b000: tag none, type VCHR, usecount 5, writecount 0,

Re: Q) Does perl install libperl.so ?

2003-01-05 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.01.05 21:23:32 +, Yamada Ken Takeshi wrote: I read through articles you pointed, but couldn't find the conclusion. What was the outcome of the discussion? or, still pending? I think the original submitter of the problem would try to look in to why plperl did not use the .a

Re: kernel compile bloat

2003-01-05 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 22:14:26 +1000 (EST) Andy Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does compiling a kernel (make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC) take 7 times as much space on 5.0-current than it does on 4.7-stable? On a 4.7-stable box, /usr/obj/usr/src/sys totals 34 MB. On a 5.0-current

Re: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-05 Thread David Rhodus
On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 06:00 PM, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-04 ] [ Subjecte: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex ] Juli Mallett pointed me at the following

Panic: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started

2003-01-05 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Recompiled the kernel (GENERIC) and installed. But now it panics on: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started. --WjW PS: Once it trips into the debugger, how do I get it to dump? panic just reboots. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Willem Jan

Re: Panic: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message 063601c2b4d0$ff02dc50$471b3dd4@dual, Willem Jan Withagen writes: Recompiled the kernel (GENERIC) and installed. But now it panics on: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started. When does it panic ? in the boot sequence ? after ? Can you get me the first 4-5 lines of the

Calling gcc created constructors in the kernel...

2003-01-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I want to get --test-coverage and --profile-arcs working for the kernel in order to give us better statistical tools. Unfortunately, GCC now uses construcorts to string the counters into a list, and we don't call constructors in the kernel. Would it be evil to do that ? I've managed to get it

Re: nVidia opengl works as root but not as user

2003-01-05 Thread David Holm
Hmm, when I mounted my home dir as read-only I was able to use OpenGL as a normal user. But I've looked all through my home dir and I can't find anything there that would affect OpenGL if the user had write access to the partition =(. //David Holm On Sunday 05 January 2003 11:38, David Holm

specfs lock plumbing broken

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Evans
The following change uncovers bugs in specfs locking and other places: % RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c,v % Working file: ufs_vnops.c % head: 1.222 % ... % % revision 1.221 % date: 2003/01/04 08:47:19; author: phk; state: Exp; lines: +0 -9 % Since

Re: VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR?

2003-01-05 Thread walt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes: VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR : 0xc25fd000: tag none, type VCHR, usecount 5, writecount 0, refcount 6, flags (VV_OBJBUF), Sorry, need DDB option to print backtrace That feels like an error message (sort of) but everything seems to

Re: specfs lock plumbing broken

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: The following change uncovers bugs in specfs locking and other places: Wow, that was fun! :-/ I always wondered why specfs would insist on no locking, but I never had much ambition for finding out. Fixing specfs is simple: This is not tested

Re: nVidia opengl works as root but not as user

2003-01-05 Thread walt
David Holm wrote: Hi, it's getting boring seeing all the nvidia posts but I'm so darn close to having it working here... May I ask what you've done to get as far as you have? I have their driver working okay on -STABLE but of course it won't even compile on -CURRENT and I don't know enough to

Re: kernel compile bloat

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 22:14:26 +1000 (EST) Andy Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does compiling a kernel (make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC) take 7 times as much space on 5.0-current than it does on 4.7-stable? On a 4.7-stable box,

Examples of School Web Sites

2003-01-05 Thread jamieclarcksong
Found some other school web sites that we may want to compare ours too! http://bearcat.ubly.k12.mi.us/links/links.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Periodic scripts ignore bzip2ed log files

2003-01-05 Thread Stefan Esser
When newsyslog.conf was modified to compress rotated log files with bzip2 instead of gzip some 3 months ago, most of the periodic scripts that process those log files were not tought how to decompress those archived files. This affects the following scripts:

Re: specfs lock plumbing broken

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: The following change uncovers bugs in specfs locking and other places: Wow, that was fun! :-/ It took a while, yes %-). I always wondered why specfs would insist on no locking, but I never had

Re: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-05 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-04 ] [ Subjecte: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex ] Juli Mallett pointed me at the following reproduceable problem on my -current notebook with userland/kernel

Re: specfs lock plumbing broken

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I always wondered why specfs would insist on no locking, but I never had much ambition for finding out. Me too. It seems to be mostly a mistake. Fixing specfs is simple: This is not tested with

gdb: failed to set signal flags properly for ast()

2003-01-05 Thread Robert Watson
While debugging the recent pthreads problem, I've started running into this: pid 663 (test), uid 1000: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) failed to set signal flags properly for ast() failed to set signal flags properly for ast() failed to set signal flags properly for ast() failed to set signal

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-05 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 18:00 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Wemm writes: No, it isn't the regression tests. It is this here in the start of stage 4: === usr.bin/vi *** Error code 1 (ignored) ***

Re: gdb: failed to set signal flags properly for ast()

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe rt Watson writes: While debugging the recent pthreads problem, I've started running into this: pid 663 (test), uid 1000: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) failed to set signal flags properly for ast() failed to set signal flags properly for ast() failed to set

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread Paul A. Mayer
Hi, I had to install the e2fstools port before I could access my e2fs partitions after installing -current. Thereafter everything has been fine. No problems with the disk, etc. The only thing that is a problem is if your e2fs partion(s) are mounted and your system crashes or the mount is

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul A. Mayer writes: Hi, I had to install the e2fstools port before I could access my e2fs partitions after installing -current. Thereafter everything has been fine. No problems with the disk, etc. The only thing that is a problem is if your e2fs partion(s)

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread Paul A. Mayer
Hi Poul-Henning, I does printf, but it doesn't initiate the e2fsck. Using the ports e2fsck has not shown itself to be the way to do restore order. (I get et hav of ata unaligned access errors and lots of other garbage.) It's easier to boot up a Gentoo LiveCD and do it right.) Thanks, Paul

Re: specfs lock plumbing broken

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is not tested with DEVFS I take it ? It doesn't affect devfs because devfs doesn't go through ufs. It goes straight to the default vnodeop table

Re: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Robert Watson wrote: Updating to Jan 4 kernel generates the same failure mode for me: following What makes you think it's the kernel? a ^T, I get a core dump. If I run it outside of gdb and then run gdb on the core dump, I get the following: To Unsubscribe: send

Re: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-05 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Robert Watson wrote: Updating to Jan 4 kernel generates the same failure mode for me: following What makes you think it's the kernel? Well, to be more precise, I upgraded the entire system to Jan 4. I'm assuming it's

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Paul A. Mayer wrote: I does printf, but it doesn't initiate the e2fsck. Using the ports It prints essentially the same mount failure message as ufs. e2fsck has not shown itself to be the way to do restore order. (I get et hav of ata unaligned access errors and lots of

Re: specfs lock plumbing broken

2003-01-05 Thread Nate Lawson
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: - spec_print() is of low quality: it doesn't print the device name or number. - devfs_print() would be reachable but doesn't exist, so vprint() prints even lower quality output for devfs since there nothing prints an inode number either. I was the

Re: Periodic scripts ignore bzip2ed log files

2003-01-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 07:38:58PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: When newsyslog.conf was modified to compress rotated log files with bzip2 instead of gzip some 3 months ago, most of the periodic scripts that process those log files were not tought how to decompress those archived files. This

Re: Panic: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started

2003-01-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:01:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message 063601c2b4d0$ff02dc50$471b3dd4@dual, Willem Jan Withagen writes: But now it panics on: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started. When does it panic ? in the boot sequence ? after ? After about 24

Re: kernel compile bloat

2003-01-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 10:14:26PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: On a 4.7-stable box, /usr/obj/usr/src/sys totals 34 MB. On a 5.0-current box, /usr/obj/usr/src/sys totals 270 MB! The debugging format (stabs to dwarf2) has also changed from 4.x to 5-CURRENT. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread Paul A. Mayer
Hi Bruce, Thanks for this info. It's way beyond my technical understanding (which is truely minimal!), but I think I get the idea. What would this look like as a series of commands? Or better yet, what's the right way to share data between FreeBSD -current/coming and linux in a dual boot

Re: Panic: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David O'Brien writes: On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:01:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message 063601c2b4d0$ff02dc50$471b3dd4@dual, Willem Jan Withagen writes: But now it panics on: Initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs1: already started. When does it panic ?

Re: specfs lock plumbing broken

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: No. Also no INVARIANTS and the like. A profiling kernel (with profiling not running) seemed to panic faster. Ok, in this case listening to KASSERTS would probably have helped you. Please try 1.351 of vfs_bio.c -- Poul-Henning Kamp |

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
Paul A. Mayer wrote: I had to install the e2fstools port before I could access my e2fs partitions after installing -current. Thereafter everything has been fine. No problems with the disk, etc. Hm, didn't know about this port.. but it still doesn't include a mount program, and I still can't

Re: nVidia opengl works as root but not as user

2003-01-05 Thread Jonah Sherman
Im not sure why this would cause it but it's the only thing I can think of that differentiates between root and non-root for gl stuff: In your XF86Config-4, do you have a section which resembles the following? : Section DRI Mode 0666 EndSection If not, try adding it... On Sun,

Re: nVidia opengl works as root but not as user

2003-01-05 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:31:56PM -0500, Jonah Sherman wrote: Im not sure why this would cause it but it's the only thing I can think of that differentiates between root and non-root for gl stuff: In your XF86Config-4, do you have a section which resembles the following? :

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rahul Siddharthan writes: # e2fsck -n /dev/ad0s2 e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 714892 blocks The physical size of the device is 0 blocks Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt! Abort? no

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # e2fsck -n /dev/ad0s2 e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 714892 blocks The physical size of the device is 0 blocks Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupt! Abort? no /dev/ad0s2: clean,

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rahul Siddharthan writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # e2fsck -n /dev/ad0s2 e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) The filesystem size (according to the superblock) is 714892 blocks The physical size of the device is 0 blocks Either the superblock or the partition table is

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-05 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Jan 6, 2003 at 00:14:15: I'm not an EXT2 specialist, and I don't really intend to become one, so I hope somebody else can help you out... As posted earlier, there seems to be funny stuff on my ufs disklabel too: # disklabel -r /dev/ad0s1 8 partitions: #size

Re: VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR?

2003-01-05 Thread Peter Kostouros
Hi I received a similar problem during booting into single user mode upon startup. I hope the following helps: mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad2s1a start_init: trying /sbin/init VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR :0xc189a00: tag none, type VCHR, usecount 5, write count 0, refcount 6, flags (VV_OBJBUF)

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: bzip2recover isn't compiled/installed during build/install world (STABLE CURRENT)

2003-01-05 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Nuno Teixeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I noted that bzip2recover isn't installed during build/installworld. I think it may be something related with it makefile. This happens on both STABLE and CURRENT brach. I someone could correct this, I apreciate that. I

Re: bzip2recover isn't compiled/installed during build/install world (STABLE CURRENT)

2003-01-05 Thread Jan Schlesner
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:38:18AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Nuno Teixeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I noted that bzip2recover isn't installed during build/installworld. I think it may be something related with it makefile. This happens on both STABLE and CURRENT

Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) Giant @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:206

2003-01-05 Thread ryan beasley
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:31:45AM -0600, ryan beasley wrote: Sources are HEAD from Dec 28th, 2002, 04:00 -0600. DDB session reprinted below. dmesg at the tail. OK, I found a way to reproduce this one, but given that it only happens with a 3rd party module, I'm not necessarily

Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) Giant @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:206

2003-01-05 Thread ryan beasley
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 08:54:01PM -0600, ryan beasley wrote: I'm including a GDB capture including traceback and some locking information. Anyone have any ideas? Is there any other data I should grab and submit? I'm really sorry for following up to myself again, but the

unsubscribe

2003-01-05 Thread Hans Wander
auth 72159d4c unsubscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR?

2003-01-05 Thread phk
That one should already be fixed. In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Kostouros writes: Hi I received a similar problem during booting into single user mode upon startup. I hope the following helps: mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad2s1a start_init: trying /sbin/init VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR

usb hid device timeout

2003-01-05 Thread David Xu
I have a CD Tower device (a USB HID device) which always failed to be identified under CURRENT source without following patch, it is always timeout, could anyone look the following patch: Index: usb_subr.c === RCS file: