This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of
FreeBSD 5.1.
FreeBSD 5.1
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
build native java for FreeBSD.
# cd /usr/ports/java/jdk13
# make install clean
That's what I meant; it didn't work for me. It got
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 18:53:16, segr (Stephane Raimbault) wrote about FreeBSD
5.1-BETA2 boot up messages:
SR I just noticed that when I boot up in FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 I get a whole bunch of
SR messages fly by the screen (see below for errors from /var/log/messages).
SR Does anyone know what is
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 17:38:04, larse (Lars Eggert) wrote about Re: Libthr stable
enough for testing:
LE I tried, but the following is a surefire way to freeze my SMP box solid
LE at the moment (with today's libthr):
SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD?
-netch-
Valentin Nechayev wrote:
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 17:38:04, larse (Lars Eggert) wrote about Re: Libthr stable enough for testing:
LE I tried, but the following is a surefire way to freeze my SMP box solid
LE at the moment (with today's libthr):
SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD?
SCHED_4BSD
--
Lars Eggert
TB --- 2003-05-31 18:52:11 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2003-05-31 18:52:11 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-05-31 18:54:44 - building world
TB --- cd
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:06:48 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:06:48 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:08:27 - building world
TB --- cd
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:21:20 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:21:20 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-05-31 19:23:04 - building world
TB
I have flushed my integration tree now for all but three patches
which are subject to various special handlings.
Sorry about the commit-storm, but I didn't feel like dumping it all
into one commit (What I did during code freeze).
And now, back to the real substantial stuff in the other trees
In rev 1.214 of sys/dev/pci/pci.c, we have started checking if a
pci_set_command_bit() was successful with a subsequent PCI_READ_CONFIG
and comparing the results. For some odd reason, this doesnt work when
my viapropm tries to attach. Allocating its port resources fails in
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:00:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will continue through
Whenever I plug my SanDisk SDDR31 CF reader into my 5.1-BETA system,
I am told that the device doesn't support Get Max Lun. I have added a USB
quirk to my kernel to fix this, and it seems to work perfectly. I would
appreciate if somebody would consider adding this before 5.2-RELEASE.
umass0:
--On 31. mai 2003 11:22 -0400 Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I meant; it didn't work for me. It got pretty far
through the build but seemed to run out of some sort of resource.
I couldn't tell by the error message what it was, and I don't
have the log anymore.
The last time I
in a prior post, I reported after a fresh kernel developer install from the x86 5.1
beta 2 ISO, i successfully configured the network and ping a domain name. Then I
attempted to install /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. This fails and repeated
attempts provide differing failures. output
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
build native java for FreeBSD.
# cd /usr/ports/java/jdk13
# make install clean
DES
I disagree. I recently built jdk13 on
Christopher Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
build native java for FreeBSD.
# cd /usr/ports/java/jdk13
# make install clean
I
FreeBSD 5.1 Release Enlightenment BUS ERROR
all actions performed as root
installed 5.1 beta 2
installed bash from ports
then cvsuped to 5.1 release
then from ports installed xfree86, enlightenment, eterm, all with out problems. While
compiling mozilla from one login, i logged in again on
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Is it my chipset's fault for not reading back the correct register value?
: The board is a SOYO K7VTAPRO-2AA6. What other info would be helpful in
: this situation?
It appears that there's some non-zero
David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In rev 1.214 of sys/dev/pci/pci.c, we have started checking if a
pci_set_command_bit() was successful with a subsequent PCI_READ_CONFIG
and comparing the results. For some odd reason, this doesnt work when
my viapropm tries to attach.
viapropm is
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:00:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list.
The live version of this list is available at:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html
Automated mailing of this list will
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote:
It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for
taking so long.
Ditto, here, unfortunately. I managed to hose my sparc64 box a couple of
weeks ago trying to
If memory serves me right, Scott Long wrote:
It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for
taking so long.
Scott, you're hardly the only person with the ability to test this
problem. In fact, you're
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:24:59PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 09:00:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
++
| Issue | Status| Responsible | Description |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-May-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
Is there any capability in the loader to do such things as get/set a PCI
config space register?
Looking at the man page I'd say not, but there is mention of
some PNP capacity (though not currently
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:18:10PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote:
It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
address this one way or another before the release. I apologize for
taking so long.
Ditto, here, unfortunately.
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 05:39:58PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:18:10PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Scott Long wrote:
It's been a matter of not having enough time, nothing more. I *will*
address this one way or another before the release.
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:52:57AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In rev 1.214 of sys/dev/pci/pci.c, we have started checking if a
pci_set_command_bit() was successful with a subsequent PCI_READ_CONFIG
and comparing the results. For some odd
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Christopher Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to
build native java for FreeBSD.
I have a suggestion to deprecate the BOOTP_NFSV3 option, and I wanted to get some
feedback.
If NFS_ROOT and BOOTP_NFSV3 are defined, then it is a noop in sys/i386/i386/locore.s?
If NFS_ROOT is defined and BOOTP_NFSV3 is undefined then it copies in a nfs_diskless
structure in
Hello everyone
I'm getting a fatal trap when I do 'shutdown' on an SMP-box that
I did cvsup on RELENG_5_1 yesterday.
'reboot' works without any problems.
This is the message:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid=1; lapic.id = 0100
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code
Hi all,
I just got this panic during compile of openoffice
Fatal trap 12 while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x68
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0271f4d
stack pointer = 0x10:0xe6e51ab0
frame pointer =
On (2003/06/01 00:50), Daniel Eischen wrote:
I just built jdk13 a couple of days ago. No problem whatsoever. You
guys must have rotten karma or something.
Did you already have a native JDK installed?
I built the native 1.4.1 JDK two weeks ago, first without the native JDK
for
Hi all,
I just got this panic during compile of openoffice
Fatal trap 12 while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x68
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0271f4d
stack pointer = 0x10:0xe6e51ab0
frame pointer =
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:32:56AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
...
:)
And I hoped a programmer who knows the source could find out and fix
very quickly.
sorry, i missed the offending line number in your previous email.
I think i missed a in all the first arguments to bcopy in
the
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
|---++---+---|
| || | The recently upgraded |
| || | if_wi driver is more |
|
I just stumbled across this vnode locking problem in procfs()
db tr
Debugger(c05215d4,c0520b94,c669b000,c0521615,e6d77764) at Debugger+0x54
vfs_badlock(c0521615,c0520b94,c669b000,c05b4340,c669b000) at vfs_badlock+0x45
assert_vop_locked(c669b000,c0520b94,c0520adf,358,c6a35400) at
Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
I just built jdk13 a couple of days ago. No problem whatsoever. You
guys must have rotten karma or something.
Did you already have a native JDK installed?
No. I used linux-sun-jdk13 to bootstrap.
DES
Got the chatter below on a box which had some libkse and some mmap activity
when it got shutdown. Built from morning of 30th May sources.
Pete
May 30 08:56:08 kompak halt: hallted by root
ock order reversal
1st 0xc3335aa8 sigacts (sigacts) @ kern/subr_trap.c:248
2nd 0xc3347d88 process lock
Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
of hardware?
Same question goes for any recent SCSI RAID controllers supported
by FreeBSD.
I admit not having tried all combinations but it seems that using anything
else than simple ahc scsi stuff results in kernel panic
I'm using a Ami MegaRaid 1500 in 5.x without any issues.
-m
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind
of hardware?
Same question goes for any recent SCSI RAID controllers supported
by FreeBSD.
I admit not
Hei!
On Thursday May 29th I installed FreeBSD 5.1 Beta2. The next day I've
update to CURRENT from May 30th. I have a 60 GB ATA harddisk and during
installation I created only 1 20 GB slice for FreeBSD. Today I wanted
to use the other 40 GB of my hard disk and create two more slices each
20 GB.
42 matches
Mail list logo
