On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:39:23PM +0300, Vitaly Markitantov wrote:
I'm trying to boot diskless my notebook.
I create boot floppy disk on which i place
kernel.gz
boot/loader
boot/loader.rc
boot/device.hints
(it's just modified kern.flp from 5.1-RELEASE distro with
my own
For the last few weeks I have difficulties building python2.3
with threads enabled.
Building using -lthr leaves python's thread related modules
inoperable.
Using -lkse builds ok, but in the python test suite test_signal.py
hangs for ever. It seems that a SIGALRM is not caught. Until sometime
It seems Bill Paul wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], M. Warner Losh writes:
Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it
an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this
one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it.
FYI, I have a no-name
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:42:58PM +0900, Till Plewe wrote:
I appended dmesg output, but right now I am just curious if there is
anybody who has a working (threads enabled) python2.3 installation
on CURRENT (SMP).
- Till
Does yours work on single processor? I compiled my python2.3b1 with
Hi,
I have two 5.1-RELEASE boxes with an NFS locking problem. One box is
the NFS server and the other the client. When attempting to login via
gdm I get:
messages:Jun 27 18:09:07 tbird gconfd (mark-2316): Failed to get lock for
daemon, exiting: Failed to lock '/home/mark/.gconfd/lock/ior':
Julian Elischer wrote:
One thing to do would be to do the buildworld in a 4.x jail/chroot
on a 5.x system..
FWIW: The only way I could get this to work reliably required
that I copy in certain files from the host environment, which
included the kernel, and anything that linked against libkvm.
Soeren Schmidt wrote:
I do have problems with the wording you use in the comments
in that patch mentioned below, I will even say that I will remove
that as soon as it appears *and* shoot the committer so it doesn't
happen again to use your choice of wording..
While you are making those
I got this with today's kernel:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc851e2e4 vm object (vm object) @ vm/vm_object.c:432
2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ vm/vm_kern.c:328
Stack backtrace:
backtrace(c03f57e2,c082f110,c040afd9,c040afd9,c040ae81) at backtrace+0x17
I'm trying to use MUTEX_PROFILING, but paniced in linux ldconfig.
Any clues?
Initial i386 initialization:.
Additional ABI support: linux
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
fault virtual address = 0xe8
fault code = supervisor read, page
At Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:37:40 + (UTC),
kuriyama wrote:
(kgdb) l *linux_brk+0x1a
0xc19d24ca is in linux_brk
(/.a/black/host/disk/arena/home/kuriyama/ncvs/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c:217).
212
213 #ifdef DEBUG
214 if (ldebug(brk))
215
TB --- 2003-06-27 09:33:24 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-06-27 09:33:24 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-06-27 09:36:17 - building world
TB
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, leafy wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:42:58PM +0900, Till Plewe wrote:
I appended dmesg output, but right now I am just curious if there is
anybody who has a working (threads enabled) python2.3 installation
on CURRENT (SMP).
- Till
Does yours work on single
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:58:33AM +0900, User Takawata wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote
:
Hello there.
I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating bsd logo.
http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz
Any chance to add it to tree?
I don't
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Mark Hannon wrote:
I have two 5.1-RELEASE boxes with an NFS locking problem. One box is
the NFS server and the other the client. When attempting to login via
gdm I get:
messages:Jun 27 18:09:07 tbird gconfd (mark-2316): Failed to get lock
for daemon, exiting:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:20:03AM +, Bosko Milekic wrote:
+ Hello there.
+
+ I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating bsd logo.
+
+http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz
+
+ Any chance to add it to tree?
+
+ I don't know whether it works or not, but this contains
Hello over there,
Well playing with it nss_ldap in 5.1R. I have found that ls -la
Will not show the names of the owner if the owner resides in LDAP
Directory only the corresponding uidNumbers. Is there a way to
show the usernames instead of uidNumbers?
Have a good time,
Andrey Nepomnyaschih
Jeff,
On an SMP box I have, which is really a p4 box with one physical
CPU, and 2 HTT cores, I've seen some strange behaviour with ULE.
With ULE enabled, I've see jobs wedge for no apparent reason.
Some examples are fsck, dhclient and gcc.
Here's an example of fsck after it stopped responding:
In the last episode (Jun 27), Andrey Nepomnyaschih said:
Well playing with it nss_ldap in 5.1R. I have found that ls -la Will
not show the names of the owner if the owner resides in LDAP
Directory only the corresponding uidNumbers. Is there a way to show
the usernames instead of uidNumbers?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:35:19PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+ + FWIW, I've tested this yesterday and wanted to commit it but
+ + shamefully I must admit that I don't know how to properly prepare a
+ + port. The screen saver works and is pretty neat although I had to
+ + build in
Andrey Nepomnyaschih wrote:
Hello over there,
Well playing with it nss_ldap in 5.1R. I have found that ls -la
Will not show the names of the owner if the owner resides in LDAP
Directory only the corresponding uidNumbers. Is there a way to
show the usernames instead of uidNumbers?
For this to
Wasn't there a patch floating around to build a dynamic world with the
placment of libc et'al in /lib ???
I'd actually like to try that patch for building a tiny fbsd image for
my net4501.
Thanks in advance,
-Jon Disnard
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 27), Andrey Nepomnyaschih
I have a P4 processor on order that will support hyperthreading. I was
wondering what the general opinion is on enabling HTT for FreeBSD-5
(current).
Thanks for any input.
--
Glenn Johnson
USDA, ARS, SRRC Phone: (504) 286-4252
New Orleans, LA 70124 e-mail: [EMAIL
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Jeff,
On an SMP box I have, which is really a p4 box with one physical
CPU, and 2 HTT cores, I've seen some strange behaviour with ULE.
With ULE enabled, I've see jobs wedge for no apparent reason.
Some examples are fsck, dhclient and gcc.
Can
Jeff Roberson writes:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Jeff,
On an SMP box I have, which is really a p4 box with one physical
CPU, and 2 HTT cores, I've seen some strange behaviour with ULE.
With ULE enabled, I've see jobs wedge for no apparent reason.
Some
Jeff Roberson writes:
Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
I found a different problem which is nearly as interesting.
Note that ps thinks sysctl is on cpu 255...
Boot hangs here:
cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not
present
SMP: AP CPU #1
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
I have a P4 processor on order that will support hyperthreading. I was
wondering what the general opinion is on enabling HTT for FreeBSD-5
(current).
Thanks for any input.
man 4 smp
See the machdep.hlt_logical_cpus sysctl.
--
Doug White
On 27-Jun-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Jeff Roberson writes:
Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
I found a different problem which is nearly as interesting.
Note that ps thinks sysctl is on cpu 255...
#define NOCPU 0xff/* For when we aren't on a
FYI
I was able to build world by reverting to a kernel cvsup'ed and built on
30/05/2003; I could not do so with a kernel cvsup'ed and built on
06/06/2003.
Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:10:09PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
Overheating/powermanagement - maybe. I have
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:46:47PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
I have a P4 processor on order that will support hyperthreading.
I was wondering what the general opinion is on enabling HTT for
FreeBSD-5 (current).
Thanks for any input.
man 4 smp
On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 05:46 PM, Doug White wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
I have a P4 processor on order that will support hyperthreading. I
was
wondering what the general opinion is on enabling HTT for FreeBSD-5
(current).
Thanks for any input.
He didn't ask how...
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 06:39:12PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote:
Thanks. I had read the smp manual page. I know _how_ to enable HTT; I
was wondering whether I _should_ enable it. It seems the answer is that
it is not beneficial in its current state because the scheduler does not
yet
In order to give some values to compare: I was recently
running an P4 3.06 GHz with Hyperthreading (actually it
was Linux, but I will repeat the tests with current
when I have time for such games :)
Running ubench 0.32 on this HTT enabled machine (i865PE)
showed some interesting details when
I don't know since when this happens, but I've noticed,
that the ETA time looks strange:
While fetching this file:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 ftp ftp 36 Jun 27 15:43 live-current.iso -
live-5.1-CURRENT-20030627-JPSNAP.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 238714880 Jun 27 15:42 live-5.1-CURRENT-20030627
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:28:31 -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
You might compare the dmesg output from before/after and see if there are
any obvious changes in IRQ allocation, shared interrupts, etc. Perhaps
the changes in interrupt routing have
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:27:28PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote:
my previous kernel is about May 10, and the fxp works fine for me
but I cvsuped and make world/kernel yesterday (6/26), and then terrible thing
happens... the connection becomes v...e...r...y... s...l...o...w...
my ping time to
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 23:40:24 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Check that it's negotiating the media type and options correctly. On
the gohan machines it has been failing to negotiate full-duplex mode
for the past few months, leading to LAN transfer speeds on the order
of 20kps unless I set the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 13:27:28 +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote:
my previous kernel is about May 10, and the fxp works fine for me
but I cvsuped and make world/kernel yesterday (6/26), and then terrible thing
happens... the connection becomes v...e...r...y... s...l...o...w...
my ping time to the
You might compare the dmesg output from before/after and see if there are
any obvious changes in IRQ allocation, shared interrupts, etc. Perhaps
the changes in interrupt routing have resulted in some new behavior.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:28:31 -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
You might compare the dmesg output from before/after and see if there are
any obvious changes in IRQ allocation, shared interrupts, etc. Perhaps
the changes in interrupt routing have resulted in some new behavior.
I lost my old
i run 5.1 on one of the inhouse production boxes successful. there are
only 2 small points witch are a pain and i found no solution. box was
fresh setup with 5.0 then cvsuped to 5.1.
1. when starting some scripts su doesnt return from the shell and hangs
on boot. when starting manually i get
40 matches
Mail list logo
