Andrew Thompson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Andrew Thompson wrote:
It has helped and the laptop is able to suspend with the serial cable
attached (further than before). It now panics on the first resume with
the following (gdb output at bottom).
You should do a quick grep thr
Bruce Evans wrote:
-current doesn't write extended attributes unless you enabled them.
OK. I'm wrong. Really I don't understand a problem. Superblock was
corrupted. I've fix it with fsck (from other sector). But I decided
remake the FS and run newfs from -stable again. Now I write on it buth
-s
Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to
happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled
through the ports?
They need to replace -pthr
This is 10days old kernel panic, the same type I report before, but now I
use dont-sync-on-panic sysctl, so some stack trace finally available:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction poi
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dan Naumov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:42, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > We've already been over this before. The problem is not
> > > as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that
> > > don't have -pthread.
> >
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:42, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > We've already been over this before. The problem is not
> > as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that
> > don't have -pthread.
>
> And those platforms would be?
Solaris for one:
bash
I just set up a new box with -CURRENT on it, using 20030918-JPSNAP
(cvsup'ed the next day), and I'm having some really strange things going on with
volume control.
aumix won't complain, and will successfully query the mixer device. I can set the
volume levels to my hearts content, but the only
Bernd,
Bernd Walter wrote:
What does USB_DEBUG with hw.usb.debug=2 and hw.usb.ugen.debug=2 say?
it says this:
usbd_setup_pipe: dev=0xc3f9d980 iface=0xc3efbaa0 ep=0xc3f192c8
pipe=0xdb936974
ugenwrite: transfer 5 bytes
usbd_intr_transfer: start transfer 5 bytes
usbd_intr_transfer: transferred 0
us
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Lars Eggert wrote:
> I'm trying to get the USB RF remote control that comes with some ATI
> Wonder cards to do something meaningful under -current.
Can I recommend the use of libusb for the abstracting of the USB layer?
It would allow your driver/interface to work on all Fre
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> > > plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> > > I newfs'ed
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Andrew Thompson wrote:
It has helped and the laptop is able to suspend with the serial cable
attached (further than before). It now panics on the first resume with
the following (gdb output at bottom).
I think the serial cable is masking the problem as witho
I'm getting complaints from ata or atapicam during boot-up, but my
CD-ROM seems fine (reading, at least). ACPI enabled, sym driver enabled
+ in use with a 875 chip (Tekram DC-390F) and cd0, da0, sa0, sa1.
Is this something to worry about?
dmesg excerpt:
...
atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:42, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> We've already been over this before. The problem is not
> as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that
> don't have -pthread.
And those platforms would be?
Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
[EMAI
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:07, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
>
> > Thanks, the hang problems are fixed now.
>
> That's great news!
I am also very grateful for your fix. I now seem to be able to run
-CURRENT on my home desktop without any issues whatsoever :)
>
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:32:28PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Bernd,
>
> Bernd Walter wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
> >>
> >>static char init1[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14 };
> >>static char init2[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20 };
Bernd,
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
static char init1[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14 };
static char init2[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20 };
Are you shure that the above is correct data for the device?
The IO error could al
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get the USB RF remote control that comes with some ATI
> Wonder cards to do something meaningful under -current.
>
> It shows up as an "X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver" with three
> devices: /dev/ugen0
Hi,
i still have problems with atapicam and atang, while booting with
atapicam i get these messages:
Sep 21 23:30:17 dreamland kernel: atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 10 at device
31.1 on pci0
Sep 21 23:30:17 dreamland kernel: ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
Sep 21 2
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to
> > > happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled
> > >
Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
> Thanks, the hang problems are fixed now.
That's great news!
> No one told me that I was barking up the wrong tree...
Ah, computers are fragile and playful things that always find creative
and unexcepted ways of failing... :)
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PRO
OLDCARD doesn't work as well.
Tried to get my Xircom REM56G-100 to run with OLDCARD
but card won't be detected by pccardd.
ifconfig -a only shows lp0 and lo0.
Andreas ///
--
Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT
Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/
__
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>
> > I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> > plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> > I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I bo
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Ceri Davies wrote:
> I'm confused; how does one disable PAE? I don't see a kernel option for
> it.
'options PAE' turns it on. Without it turns it off. :)
--
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted
> with -stable I've found the partition FS was
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:35:12PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:21:20PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>>We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9.
>
>Last night I upgraded my laptop and it hung partway thru the boot
>(immediately after the pcm0: line in
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to
> > happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled
> > through the ports?
>
> They need to replace -pthread
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Bruce Mackay wrote:
> I actually tried hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range = 1 to no
> avail. I've tried building pcm into my kernel, I've tried loading them
> as modules with no success. I was reading somewhere that I may need
> hw.pci.enable_io_modes = 1 to use my soun
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
>
> > Le 2003-09-21, Daniel Eischen écrivait :
> >
> > > Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
> > > Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check
I'm getting intermittent problems on boot, sometimes it boots, most of
the time not. When it stop it's at:
ata0-master: pio=0x0c wdma=0x22 udma=0x45 cable=80pin
dmesg -v from a full boot:
http://am-productions.biz/docs/dmesg.txt
--
Anish Mistry
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
Subject: Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 03:01:28 +0900, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote:
> Ok, I will try it.
I tried to cvsup and make build & installkernel. This kernel said:
[snip]
acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 2 steps (100% to 50.0%), cu
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: John Birrell wrote:
: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >>At the very least, we should put [-pthread] back as a noop. The timing on
: >>this really sucks because it breaks the p
John Birrell wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
At the very least, we should put [-pthread] back as a noop. The timing on
this really sucks because it breaks the ports tree for an extended
period of time. While the fixes are simple, they haven't been made
yet.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
>
> > The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me.
>
> Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE
> recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source tree up-to-date?
> Several fixes have be
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 17:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what sort of bugs?
>
> (and is this a problem with the port, rather than ncurses).
>
> > From: Vitalis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Subject: ncurses-5.3 buggy under 5.1-current
> >
> >
> > This is the only article in this thread
> >
Subject: Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing
interrupt,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:57:43 +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Can't you drop into DDB at that point?
Ok, I will try it.
> Also, do you have up-to-date sources?
Yes, of course. I have recent ones.
--
Shin-ichi YOSH
Hi,
I'm trying to get the USB RF remote control that comes with some ATI
Wonder cards to do something meaningful under -current.
It shows up as an "X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver" with three
devices: /dev/ugen0, and the corresponding input (/dev/ugen0.1) and
output endpoints (/dev/ug
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-21, Daniel Eischen écrivait :
>
> > Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
> > Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition
> > Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:
- Original Message -
From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: CIS is too long
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kenichi Niioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I'm gettin
Le 2003-09-21, Daniel Eischen écrivait :
> Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
> Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition
> Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): Recovered Sense
> Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kern
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
>
> > The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me.
>
> Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE
> recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source tree up-to-date?
> Several fixes have
Le 2003-09-21, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto écrivait :
> I could not get a backtrace because infinite loop occured like this:
Can't you drop into DDB at that point? Also, do you have up-to-date
sources?
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kenichi Niioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I'm getting the following errors when I insert my pccard.
:
: CIS is too long -- truncating
: pccard0: Card has no functions!
: cbb0: PC Card card activation failed
There's a small set of cards that aren't be
Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
> The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me.
Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE
recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source tree up-to-date?
Several fixes have been committed to both the ATA and the CAM subsystems
rec
Le 2003-09-21, Dan Naumov écrivait :
> (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): Recovered Sense
> (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 1 80 0 ff 0
> (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
> (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition
> (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0
> (probe2:ata1:0
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Bruce Mackay wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I get the following hang up when I try booting up, here's the problem area...
> >
> > pcm0: at device 31.5 on pci0
> > pcm0: unable to map IO
Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
From: "Dan Naumov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seeing as -pthread support has been removed from -CURRENT breaking
_LOTS_ of ports, is it possible to "get it back" into a local source
tree ? If so, how ? Thanks in advance.
All you need to do is add:
CONFIGURE_ENV+=PTHREAD_LIB
Hi,
I was playing around with CAM and got this reproducible panic:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x46
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x:0xc03962fe
stack pointer = 0x10:0xd835b9b4
frame poin
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 22:53, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-20, Daniel Eischen écrivait :
>
> > No, using latest sources, with or without atapicam, does
> > not solve the problem. It still hangs.
>
> Please try the patch below, it should at least work around the problem.
I have rebuilt world
Hi,
when doing my first make release I noticed it stopped somewhere and
hung :(
74830 p2 D+ 0:01.12 cpio -dump /mnt
The host is i386 and TARGET ist sparc64 just to confuse.
The base system runs a HEAD world/kernel from mid july.
The above cpio must be from src/release/sparc64/mkisoimages.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:14:40PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Everything has been rock-solid, no problems at all. Were it not for
> : PAE, I would say to go ahead and release it.
>
> That's good to hear
Hello!
I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted
with -stable I've found the partition FS was broken.
I think it's because of extended atr
Update the status now on -current.
I downloaded the last recent snapshot of 2003-09-20 from current.freebsd.org.
Made a test ftp session using the live CDROM. Same like a week before.
Panic if I download something big from my FreeBSD ftp server.
5.1 on my normal PIII PC works fine. This seems to
* Nicolai Petri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-21 12:23]:
> But now even newfs gives me "Write failed". This seems a bit odd
> because i can easily do a "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0s2d" and
> clear out the label. Any hints ? I'm thinking geom and/or
> blocksize problems. But that's just a guess.
Th
I'm running -current from september, 14 on my notebook.
After an unclean shutdown (out of batteri) my /var filesystem died horrible.
Now when i'm trying to do a fsck I always get "write failed" for a lot of
blocks. I saw this error some months ago where I just wiped the fs with
newfs. But now e
Hi!
The installation of the ncurses-5.3 port leaves the system unusable for
apps needing libncurses e.g. vi, sysinstall... The characters on output
are severely scrambled.
Its desinstallation solves the problem (the ncurses-5.2 from src/contrib
works fine with 5.1-current). But some good ports re
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sat Sep 20 11:38:46 JST 2003 Sep 20
12:47:38 daemon kernel:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/niioka/src/obj/usr/src/sys/DAEMON
I'm getting the following errors when I insert my pccard.
CIS is too long -- truncating
pccard0: Card has no functions!
cbb0: PC Card card activation faile
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > Well, actually it is directly related. Part of the plan to
> > transition to libpthread is making ports PTHREAD_LIBS compliant.
> > As stated in that thread, if a libpthread exists on the system,
> > autoc
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to
> happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled
> through the ports?
They need to replace -pthread with their thread library of choice
(e.g. -lc_r or -
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Well, actually it is directly related. Part of the plan to
> transition to libpthread is making ports PTHREAD_LIBS compliant.
> As stated in that thread, if a libpthread exists on the system,
> autoconf/configure will pick it up and the port will also
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:17:28AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > From what I've recently read, the freeze should be lifting
> > this week. Can we hold off till then? Is a few more days
> > going to matter? If the freeze continues longer than expecte
> I don't think committing fixes for -current breakages should cause
> problems for 4.9-RELEASE (especially with the caveat that they be
> compile tested on -stable).
It takes several days to do the compile QA. That's assuming
that no actual users are allowed to have time to test the changes
befo
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:14:22 +0200
Pawel Worach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Last if_sk update broke buildkernel
>
> ===> sk
> rm -f .depend
> mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@
> -I@/../include /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../pci/if_sk.c
> /usr/src/sys/pc
IMHO if the ports tree is unfrozen for the -pthreads fixes,
the 4.9 release schedule will drift days if not weeks.
While it's not as apparent as the kernel build issues,
there are significant QA issues that go into the ports
system. That's why the freeze is in place, to allow
the QA process to ru
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:17:28AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> From what I've recently read, the freeze should be lifting
> this week. Can we hold off till then? Is a few more days
> going to matter? If the freeze continues longer than expected,
> I'll back the change out until it's over.
I
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:12:55AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:44:35AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > > > What, precisely, do you object to in the above proposal?
>
65 matches
Mail list logo
