Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer

2011-03-07 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:24:20 -0800 Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote about Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer: FC Or, does anyone have instructions on how to convert the ISO images FC into memstick images? Preferably using a Linux station, not a FreeBSD FC station.

Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD

2011-03-07 Thread Dima Panov
hello! FreeBSD 9.0-900033-CURRENT #0 r219338M: Mon Mar 7 11:31:40 VLAT 2011 All fine with AR9285, WPA2 is used stable 36/48/54Mbps with my AP 07.03.2011, 06:14, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com: On 7 March 2011 03:21, Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za; wrote:  Adrian Chadd wrote:  I'd like

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2011-03-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-03-07 12:33:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-07 12:33:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2011-03-07 12:33:53 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-07 12:34:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-07 12:34:00 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-03-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-03-07 13:14:32 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-07 13:14:32 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2011-03-07 13:14:32 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-07 13:14:47 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-07 13:14:47 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2011-03-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-03-07 13:24:21 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-07 13:24:21 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2011-03-07 13:24:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-07 13:24:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-07 13:24:30 -

Re: Request: AR9285 EEPROM dumps (was Re: More if_ath churn coming your way!)

2011-03-07 Thread Vinícius Zavam
2011/3/7 Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com: Which version of the driver are you using? Adrian # $FreeBSD: src/sys/modules/ath/Makefile,v 1.19 2011/03/02 17:19:54 adrian Exp $ 2011/3/7 Vinícius Zavam egyp...@googlemail.com 2011/1/23 Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com: You'll have to

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2011-03-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-03-07 16:25:38 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-07 16:25:38 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2011-03-07 16:25:38 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-07 16:25:50 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-07 16:25:50 -

Re: More if_ath churn coming your way!

2011-03-07 Thread Vinícius Zavam
2011/1/22 Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com: So it's all completely stable for you too right now? adrian 2011/1/22 Dima Panov flu...@fluffy.khv.ru: Hello! 22.01.2011, 13:56, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com: On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com; wrote:  

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2011-03-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-03-07 17:33:05 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-07 17:33:05 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2011-03-07 17:33:05 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-07 17:33:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-07 17:33:10 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-03-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:15 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:15 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:15 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:23 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:23 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2011-03-07 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:25 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-03-07 18:36:25 -

Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer

2011-03-07 Thread Freddie Cash
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: BSDinstall has acquired at this point its final form (prior to a future merge with pc-sysinstall), and I believe is ready to replace sysinstall on the 9.0 snapshot ISOs. Barring any objections, I would like to pull

r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread George Liaskos
Hi, The following error occurs when i try to build r219385. cc -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/kerberos5/tools/make-roken/../../include -std=gnu99 -c make-roken.c make-roken.c:1: error: bad value (core2) for -march= switch make-roken.c:1: error: bad value (core2) for -mtune=

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Mar 7 11, George Liaskos wrote: Hi, The following error occurs when i try to build r219385. cc -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/kerberos5/tools/make-roken/../../include -std=gnu99 -c make-roken.c make-roken.c:1: error: bad value (core2) for -march= switch

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread George Liaskos
What process did you follow to get here? I did a make toolchain followed by make buildworld. that's because the latest gcc commits have support for core2 and thus it no longer is being expanded to nocona. please note that having core2 in make.conf has always been *wrong*. hence the need to

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:19:40PM +0200, George Liaskos wrote: What process did you follow to get here? I did a make toolchain followed by make buildworld. that's because the latest gcc commits have support for core2 and thus it no longer is being expanded to nocona. please note that

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Mar 7 11, George Liaskos wrote: What process did you follow to get here? I did a make toolchain followed by make buildworld. that's because the latest gcc commits have support for core2 and thus it no longer is being expanded to nocona. please note that having core2 in

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread George Liaskos
either native or nocona (actually native should evaluate to nocona): touch _native_test.c gcc -march=native -### _native_test.c should tell which -march and -mtune settings gcc assumes for native. indeed there are some known problems with native, but i think those are limited to

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Mar 8 11, George Liaskos wrote: either native or nocona (actually native should evaluate to nocona): touch _native_test.c gcc -march=native -### _native_test.c should tell which -march and -mtune settings gcc assumes for native. indeed there are some known problems with

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread George Liaskos
native doesn't get handled by bsd.cpu.mk at all! it gets passed to gcc directly and gcc choses -m{tune,arch} on it's own. don't add -march=* directly to CFLAGS. this is bound to go wrong at some point. use CPUTYPE to set the cpu and CFLAGS for -O*, -pipe, etc. also please keep in mind that

Re: missing files in readdir(3) on NFS export of ZFS volume (since v28?)

2011-03-07 Thread Rick Macklem
Hello, I'm running a 9-current server as compiled on Sat Mar 5 02:17:14 CET 2011. Since I upgraded to ZFS v28 I noticed missing files from NFS. The files are still accessible through NFS but they don't show up on a readdir(3). Oh, I forgot to mention that the business related to

Re: missing files in readdir(3) on NFS export of ZFS volume (since v28?)

2011-03-07 Thread Rick Macklem
Hello, I'm running a 9-current server as compiled on Sat Mar 5 02:17:14 CET 2011. Since I upgraded to ZFS v28 I noticed missing files from NFS. The files are still accessible through NFS but they don't show up on a readdir(3). Readdir (in both NFS servers) depends on ZFS to reply

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Martin Matuska
This actually does not happen at the bootstrap stage, but when building 32-bit compat libs under amd64. It looks like the system compiler is used here instead (should it be this way, isn't it a bug somewhere around Makefile.inc1?). Yes, building + installing world without this optimization makes

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Martin Matuska
This change did NOT add SSSE3 or any other new instruction sets to our base compiler. The only change of using -march=core2 vs -march=nocona is actually different instruction costs that may result in binaries more optimized for your core2 and later CPUs (and less optimized for nocona and earlier

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/07/2011 14:56, Alexander Best wrote: native doesn't get handled by bsd.cpu.mk at all! it gets passed to gcc directly and gcc choses -m{tune,arch} on it's own. don't add -march=* directly to CFLAGS. this is bound to go wrong at some point. use CPUTYPE to set the cpu and CFLAGS for -O*,

Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer

2011-03-07 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 03/07/11 14:14, Freddie Cash wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: BSDinstall has acquired at this point its final form (prior to a future merge with pc-sysinstall), and I believe is ready to replace sysinstall on the 9.0 snapshot ISOs.

Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer

2011-03-07 Thread Freddie Cash
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: On 03/07/11 14:14, Freddie Cash wrote: Things that irritated me:   - when you drop to a shell from the disk editor screen, it lists the instructions at the top, but then never repeats them ever again Can you

Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer

2011-03-07 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 03/07/11 19:27, Freddie Cash wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Nathan Whitehornnwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: On 03/07/11 14:14, Freddie Cash wrote: Things that irritated me: - when you drop to a shell from the disk editor screen, it lists the instructions at the top, but then never

Request to test if_ath - TX power control changes

2011-03-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi everyone, This patch introduces open-loop TX power control for the AR9280 (Merlin) and tidies up some of the code duplication between the AR5416 and AR9285 power control code. If you're using an AR9280 then please, -please- test this out and get back to me. I'd also appreciate EEPROM dumps

Re: missing files in readdir(3) on NFS export of ZFS volume (since v28?)

2011-03-07 Thread Pierre Beyssac
Hello Rick, Thanks for your reply. On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 06:12:43PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: Readdir (in both NFS servers) depends on ZFS to reply EOPNOTSUPP for VFS_VGET() when it cannot be done, so that Readdir will switch to using VP_LOOKUP(). Just a wild guess, but maybe ZFS v28 isn't