Re: FreeBSD 9.0 and 4-socket Intel XEON E7-4870 system -->> 80 logical CPUs

On 09/08/11 08:15, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 8 September 2011 02:27, Hartmann, O. wrote: Watching the ncpu number, I realized that FreeBSD is limited to 64 processors. Some vendors offer now 4-socket Intel Xeon E7-4870 systems. This "Westmere" based CPU has 10 physical and 20 l

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 and 4-socket Intel XEON E7-4870 system -->> 80 logical CPUs

On 8 September 2011 02:27, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >   Watching the ncpu number, I realized that FreeBSD is limited to 64 >   processors. >   Some vendors offer now 4-socket Intel Xeon E7-4870 systems. This >   "Westmere" >   based CPU has 10 physical  and 20 logical cores, summa summarum 80 >   cor

Re: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable after upgrading to r225312

On 2011-Sep-07 19:35:09 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >Thanks to a lot of excellent testing, debugging and analysis from Sebastian >(which went behind the scenes) we now have this patch: >http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfs-boot-gang.diff ... >If you use compression for a filesystem where your kernel

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

Sweet. Bernhard, can you get this committed to -HEAD before 9.0-RC1 ? Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.o

Re: 8-stable -> 9-current upgrade

On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:12:45PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > I am particularly concerned with things like header files > (/usr/include) that might bite me if not deleted. This isn't specific to that upgrade, but when I do a "make installworld", I augment the instructions from UPDATING, p

8-stable -> 9-current upgrade

I've been looking for any information on any special steps required to update from 8-stable to 9-current. /usr/src/UPDATING is a bit out of date as it has instructions for going from 5-stable to "current", although the instruction may well be the same. I am particularly concerned with things like

Re: PAM/setloginclass link error in jail

Just for the archives, this turned out to be a problem with updating the ezjail basejail directory. I had run ezjail-admin update -i, but for some reason it did not install the new libc.so.7 while it did install pretty much everything else. Moving the old basejail out of the way and installing

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 and 4-socket Intel XEON E7-4870 system -->> 80 logical CPUs

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >   Watching the ncpu number, I realized that FreeBSD is limited to 64 >   processors. >   Some vendors offer now 4-socket Intel Xeon E7-4870 systems. This >   "Westmere" >   based CPU has 10 physical  and 20 logical cores, summa summarum 80 >

FreeBSD 9.0 and 4-socket Intel XEON E7-4870 system -->> 80 logical CPUs

Watching the ncpu number, I realized that FreeBSD is limited to 64 processors. Some vendors offer now 4-socket Intel Xeon E7-4870 systems. This "Westmere" based CPU has 10 physical and 20 logical cores, summa summarum 80 cores. Is FreeBSD 9.0 capable of handling such a server

-CURRENT (BETA1) zfs pool recognized as corrupted

hi I've tried to import my zfs pool on: FreeBSD-9.0-BETA1-amd64-memstick.img My system currently runs 9.0-BETA1 and pool works correctly. zpool import returns: pool: zroot id: 3239789026273107181 state: FAULTED status: One or more devices contains corrupted data. action: The pool cannot be

Re: ath0 no longer attaches, cardbus problems?

On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:18:25 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 3:34:58 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: Looks like I had a typo in my original e

Re: ath0 no longer attaches, cardbus problems?

On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:18:25 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 3:34:58 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: > >> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: > >>> > >>> Looks like I had a typo in my original e-mail, try > >>> "deb

Re: -CURRENT (BETA2) nfs client surprise

On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:02:47 pm Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Garrett. > You wrote 8 сентября 2011 г., 0:55:11: > > > It needs to be changed to NFSCL: > > > $ svngrep -r NFSCL /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > > options NFSCL # New Network Filesystem Client > > opti

Re: -CURRENT (BETA2) nfs client surprise

Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-current. > > I've built NanoBSD image for my router based on latest HEAD sources. > Image contains minimal set of kernel modules and custom kernel with > NFSCLIENT option. > Router mounts "/usr/home" via NFS with this "/etc/fstab" line: > > 192.168.134.2:/u

Re: -CURRENT (BETA2) nfs client surprise

Hello, Garrett. You wrote 8 сентября 2011 г., 0:55:11: > It needs to be changed to NFSCL: > $ svngrep -r NFSCL /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > options NFSCL # New Network Filesystem Client > options NFS_ROOT# NFS usable as /, requires NFSCL Yep, I foun

Re: -CURRENT (BETA2) nfs client surprise

2011/9/7 Lev Serebryakov : > Hello, Freebsd-current. > >  I've built NanoBSD image for my router based on latest HEAD sources. > Image contains minimal set of kernel modules and custom kernel with > NFSCLIENT option. It needs to be changed to NFSCL: $ svngrep -r NFSCL /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC optio

-CURRENT (BETA2) nfs client surprise

Hello, Freebsd-current. I've built NanoBSD image for my router based on latest HEAD sources. Image contains minimal set of kernel modules and custom kernel with NFSCLIENT option. Router mounts "/usr/home" via NFS with this "/etc/fstab" line: 192.168.134.2:/usr/home /usr/home nfs rw,late,soft,

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 Available...

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 07/09/2011 15:51, Ken Smith wrote: >> >> As before one of the many new features of 9.0 we would like tested >> is the new installer, so fresh installs on test systems are encouraged. >> The shift in the directory layout described above is in p

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 Available...

On 07/09/2011 15:51, Ken Smith wrote: As before one of the many new features of 9.0 we would like tested is the new installer, so fresh installs on test systems are encouraged. The shift in the directory layout described above is in part due to the new installer. FTP-based installs of BETA1 woul

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 BETA2 gpart resize -s uses whole disk on first resize

2011/9/7 Andrey V. Elsukov : > On 07.09.2011 04:21, Mikael Fridh wrote: >> Hi gurus, >> >> FreeBSD freebsd9.mg8.tmtowtdi.se 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #0: Wed >> Aug 31 18:07:44 UTC 2011 >> r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 >> >> When resizing a partition, on first a

Re: ath0 no longer attaches, cardbus problems?

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 3:34:58 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: Looks like I had a typo in my original e-mail, try "debug.acpi.disabled=hostres" rather than "debug.acpi.disable=hostres". Ok, I'll try that. S

Re: panic: sched_priority: invalid priority 3990 on r225375

On Sunday, September 04, 2011 7:21:23 pm Ryan Stone wrote: > I've gotten the following panic twice while running recent builds of > head under VirtualBox(FreeBSD 8.2 host). > > panic: sched_priority: invalid priority 3990: nice 0, ticks 1227873280 > ftick 175669871 ltick 175679894 tick pri 3818 >

Re: WITHOUT_GCC flag disables installation of /usr/bin/cpp too -- is it Ok?

On 2011-09-07 19:20, Lev Serebryakov wrote: ... I think, that /usr/bin/cpp is valuable by itself, as it is handy generic preprocessor tool, useful for preparing complex ipfw scripts, for example. All others are bundled together, for sure. I think, it is good idea to exclude cpp from this lis

Re: WITHOUT_GCC flag disables installation of /usr/bin/cpp too -- is it Ok?

Hello, Dimitry. You wrote 7 сентября 2011 г., 21:17:20: >>I'm building NanoBSD image based on latest HEAD sources. I've added >> WITHOUT_GCC to install configuration, as I don't need gcc/g++ (it is >> documented in man src.conf as disabling exactly gcc and g++), but it >> affect /usr/bin/cpp t

Re: WITHOUT_GCC flag disables installation of /usr/bin/cpp too -- is it Ok?

On 2011-09-07 18:10, Lev Serebryakov wrote: I'm building NanoBSD image based on latest HEAD sources. I've added WITHOUT_GCC to install configuration, as I don't need gcc/g++ (it is documented in man src.conf as disabling exactly gcc and g++), but it affect /usr/bin/cpp too. And I need cpp for

Re: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable after upgrading to r225312

on 02/09/2011 16:35 Andriy Gapon said the following: > Then: > - obtain this patch http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfstest.head.diff > - cd sys/boot/zfs > - apply the patch to zfstest.c > - cc -I. -I../../cddl/boot/zfs zfstest.c -o zfstest > - run the resulting binary as root and provide your pool d

WITHOUT_GCC flag disables installation of /usr/bin/cpp too -- is it Ok?

Hello, freebsd-current. I'm building NanoBSD image based on latest HEAD sources. I've added WITHOUT_GCC to install configuration, as I don't need gcc/g++ (it is documented in man src.conf as disabling exactly gcc and g++), but it affect /usr/bin/cpp too. And I need cpp for some config processing

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 BETA2 gpart resize -s uses whole disk on first resize

On 07.09.2011 04:21, Mikael Fridh wrote: > Resizing from any smaller size to a larger size initially uses up the > whole disk, like if -s was not used at all even if it's as little as > one logical disk block. > > I'm wondering if anyone else can reproduce. Also, can you show the output of this c

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 BETA2 gpart resize -s uses whole disk on first resize

On 07.09.2011 04:21, Mikael Fridh wrote: > Hi gurus, > > FreeBSD freebsd9.mg8.tmtowtdi.se 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #0: Wed > Aug 31 18:07:44 UTC 2011 > r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > When resizing a partition, on first attempt it uses up the whole disk. >

Re: RELENG_8 / mpt / zpool Errors

> Advice is: > > Use -STABLE and not -RELEASE > Upgrade firmware > Avoid port multipliers > > As I'm using cheap 4K green drives I had to use wdidle3.exe to fix > the 8 second head parking and I also had to use gnop to force my > ZFS pool to use 4K transfers. We're already using -STABLE; we

FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 Available...

The second BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable. But just so you know most of the developers active in head pay more attention to the -current mailing list.

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 21:30, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 15:11, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 20:34, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:10, Kevin Lo wrote: Please try attached patch. It seems like OpenBSD added support for

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 15:11, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 20:34, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:10, Kevin Lo wrote: >>> >>> Please try attached patch. It seems like OpenBSD added support >>> for 6205, but I'm not sure if it works for 6250. > > Okay, I am r

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 21:11, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 20:34, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:10, Kevin Lo wrote: >>> >>> Please try attached patch. It seems like OpenBSD added support >>> for 6205, but I'm not sure if it works for 6250. > > Okay, I am r

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 16:53, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! > > Hm, maybe the iwn driver doesn't have the 6250 support? Is it supposed > to use 6000/6200 specific calibration (and other routines), or is it > using the 5000 routines correctly? > Has the card successfully loaded the firmware in? I'm no

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 20:34, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:10, Kevin Lo wrote: >> >> Please try attached patch. It seems like OpenBSD added support >> for 6205, but I'm not sure if it works for 6250. Okay, I am re-building the kernel now, will report here if any news. > W

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 17:20, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 09:39, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 14:10, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: >>> >>> $ uname -a >>> FreeBSD bud 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #2: Tue Sep  6 16:50:09 CST >>> 2011     root@bud:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/B

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:10, Kevin Lo wrote: > Tz-Huan Huang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a lenovo X201s with a "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" >> bundled. >> The device seems recognized as iwn0 correctly but it just doesn't work. >> The command "ifconfig wlan0 up scan" return immediately

Re: BETA2 panic

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:53, Joel Dahl wrote: > On 07-09-2011 10:59, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 22:42, Joel Dahl wrote: >> > On 05-09-2011  9:02, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 08:24, Joel Dahl wrote: >> >> > On 05-09-2011  5:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

This is interesting, and could be mentioned in updated page http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_games_bsd&num=1 -- Aldis Berjoza http://www.bsdroot.lv/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: BETA2 panic

On 07-09-2011 10:59, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 22:42, Joel Dahl wrote: > > On 05-09-2011  9:02, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 08:24, Joel Dahl wrote: > >> > On 05-09-2011  5:09, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> >> On 5 September 2011 01:04, Joel Dahl wrote: >

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

Tz-Huan Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I have a lenovo X201s with a "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" bundled. > The device seems recognized as iwn0 correctly but it just doesn't work. > The command "ifconfig wlan0 up scan" return immediately and nothing showed. > > Is the device not supported, or

Re: RELENG_8 / mpt / zpool Errors

On 7 September 2011 19:07, Matt Thyer wrote: > On 7 September 2011 13:54, Tim Gustafson wrote: > >> > What are the drives exactly? You may have issues like TLER or >> > frequent head parking. Are these SATA, SCSI or SAS and are port >> > multipliers in use? >> >> root@bsd-03: dmesg | grep da6 >>

Re: Shared libraries version bump?

On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:14:12AM +, "Thomas Mueller When FreeBSD 9.0_BETA1 was announced, the announcement included a notice that > shared library version would be updated some time prior to BETA2, which would > necessitate rebuilding all ports. > > Has this happened yet? I don't want t

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 09:39, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 14:10, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a lenovo X201s with a "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" >> bundled. >> The device seems recognized as iwn0 correctly but it just doesn't work. >> The command "ifconf

Re: RELENG_8 / mpt / zpool Errors

On 7 September 2011 13:54, Tim Gustafson wrote: > > What are the drives exactly? You may have issues like TLER or > > frequent head parking. Are these SATA, SCSI or SAS and are port > > multipliers in use? > > root@bsd-03: dmesg | grep da6 > da6 at mpt0 bus 0 scbus1 target 1 lun 0 > da6: Fixed D

Shared libraries version bump?

When FreeBSD 9.0_BETA1 was announced, the announcement included a notice that shared library version would be updated some time prior to BETA2, which would necessitate rebuilding all ports. Has this happened yet? I don't want to rebuild all ports at the wrong time. I notice BETA2 has been rel

[ANNOUNCE] 802.11n TX aggregation support for Atheros 11n NICs

Hi all, I apologise up front for the cross-posting. Please redirect all future queries about this to freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org. I guess the cat is out of the bag (and it hasn't killed anyone yet.) For the last 6 or so months, the if_ath driver and net80211 802.11n support has been updated to (

Re: BETA2 panic

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 22:42, Joel Dahl wrote: > On 05-09-2011  9:02, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 08:24, Joel Dahl wrote: >> > On 05-09-2011  5:09, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> On 5 September 2011 01:04, Joel Dahl wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > I upgraded my laptop from BE

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

Hi! Hm, maybe the iwn driver doesn't have the 6250 support? Is it supposed to use 6000/6200 specific calibration (and other routines), or is it using the 5000 routines correctly? Has the card successfully loaded the firmware in? Adrian ___ freebsd-cur

[ANNOUNCE] 802.11n TX aggregation support for Atheros 11n NICs

Hi all, I apologise up front for the cross-posting. Please redirect all future queries about this to freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org. I guess the cat is out of the bag (and it hasn't killed anyone yet.) For the last 6 or so months, the if_ath driver and net80211 802.11n support has been updated to (

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

- Original Message From: Tz-Huan Huang To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work Date: 07/09/11 09:40 > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 14:10, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a lenovo X201s with a "In

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 15:52, Andreas Tobler wrote: > - Original Message > From: Tz-Huan Huang > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work > Date: 07/09/11 09:40 > >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 14:10, Tz-Huan Huang

Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 14:10, Tz-Huan Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I have a lenovo X201s with a "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" bundled. > The device seems recognized as iwn0 correctly but it just doesn't work. > The command "ifconfig wlan0 up scan" return immediately and nothing showed. > > Is