Re: What changed in rc.d infrastructure in last months?

On 26 October 2015 at 01:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello NGie, > > Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote: > > >> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective. >> `ifconfig_` is being overloaded for starting up hostap’s (even though >> ifconfig

Re: Quick test building a module cross all targets and architectures

+1 to this thankyou! -adrian On 26 October 2015 at 02:11, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL to > only build the modules. > > What do you think about the following patch: > >> diff --git

Quick test building a module cross all targets and architectures

Hi, We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL to only build the modules. What do you think about the following patch: diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk index ddf828e..f0920df 100644 --- a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk +++

Re: What changed in rc.d infrastructure in last months?

Hello NGie, Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote: > Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective. > `ifconfig_` is being overloaded for starting up hostap’s (even though > ifconfig itself doesn’t support hostap — only `wlanmode ap`). I don’t ifconfig doesn't

Re: Make installworld fails on file not found (Error code 71)

> > It looks like a problem with WITHOUT_MANCOMPRESS. > > I am looking into it. > A fix is now committed. It has been broken since June. > Regards, > Bryan Drewery Thanks for the fix, computer is now busy with NetBSD update from 6.99.44 (16 months old) to 7.99.21 for both amd64 and i386, but

Re: Quick test building a module cross all targets and architectures

On 26 October 2015 at 11:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no

Re: AHC - 29160 interrupts not functioning?

On 10/18/15 17:37, Patrick Hess wrote: [ .. ] > I can send you a full verbose dmesg if that's of any help to you. > >> "Timedout SCBs already complete. Interrupts may not be functioning." >> when given any significant load :-( > > Just extracted an entire ports tree on that machine with no

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

On Oct 24, 2015, at 12:06 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > The thing I like most about encryption is that when I RMA a bad > drive, I don't have to worry about my data leaking if I am unable > to overwrite all the data... You are optimistic if you believe that. We ($WORK)

Re: Quick test building a module cross all targets and architectures

On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL > to only build the modules. > > What do you think about the following patch: > > > diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk >

Re: What changed in rc.d infrastructure in last months?

On Monday, October 26, 2015 04:38:21 AM Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 26 October 2015 at 01:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Hello NGie, > > > > Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective. > >>

Re: Quick test building a module cross all targets and architectures

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL > > to only build the modules. > > > > What do you think about the