Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Greg Lehey
On Friday, 27 August 1999 at 8:55:04 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes: >> On Thursday, 26 August 1999 at 16:25:14 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> int devminor; /* minor number */ >> >>

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Greg, 4K is probably too conservative, it only applies if you have a swap-backed vn device at the bottom, which would be a truly weird thing to do with vinum. Don't spend too much time on tracking the sector size yet. I think the si_bsize stuff needs some thinking before we do more with it. P

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-26 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
[ CC'ed current again.] > > I suspect some devices generate interrupt during suspending state, > > especially PS/2 mouse. Disabling the device driver or disconnecting > > the device from PC might solve the problem. Could you try one by one? > > > > > psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 > > > I had the s

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 26 August 1999 at 16:25:14 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: int devminor; /* minor number */ devminor = minor(dev); +dev->si_bsize_phys = DEV_BSIZE; +dev->si_bsize_best = BLKDEV_IOSIZE; +dev->si_bsize_

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread John W. DeBoskey
Hi, Sorry for taking so long to reply. I have an isdn line to my office which has been acting up lately (or should I say acting down?). Anyways, yes, I am using a ccd. I also have a machine with a dpt raid4 controller that I probably need to check to see if it still works My setup

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-26 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > You can look at thier products on www.soltek.com.tw, we are an authorized > distributor who stocks both the SL54U5 (was stocking SL54U1, but they > are in very short supply due to cache chip shortage) and SL56D1. Both > are sub $80.00 boards, both r

Re: Docs blows up make release

1999-08-26 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * > This makes the ports tree have a dependency on the doc tree. I don't think * > this dependency should be there. It's bad enough that the src/ tree * > depends on doc/ (and the reason I want the documentation available as * > packages is t

Re: Existance of /var/backups for periodic/daily

1999-08-26 Thread Stephen J. Roznowski
On 16 Aug, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> The 200-220 periodic files under daily expect that the directory >> /var/backups exist when they run to back up various files. If you >> delete this directory, the "cp" commands will error. >> >> There seems to be two ways to fix the files. >> >> 1. Add

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 26 August 1999 at 22:35:27 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >>That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures. >> >>You will note that with John's failure's the I/O is properly page-aligned. >>T

multipatch #5 available (includes VN & CCD fixes)

1999-08-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
I've synced my source tree and updated my big-fat patch to include fixes to the VN device and CCD device as well as all the other stuff it already contains. http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: "The Matrix" screensaver, v.0.2

1999-08-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message <5644.935710460@localhost> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : I seriously doubt they'll win this lawsuit. You can sue someone for : anything and everything, including having a hair color which : displeases you, of course, but whether you actually win the lawsuit or : have it thrown out is a

Re: "The Matrix" screensaver, v.0.2

1999-08-26 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I seriously doubt they'll win this lawsuit. You can sue someone for anything and everything, including having a hair color which displeases you, of course, but whether you actually win the lawsuit or have it thrown out is a different matter. - Jordan > In message <15454.935598612@localhost> "Jo

RE: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Pillai, Girish
unsubscribe freebsd-current -Original Message- From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 1999 6:25 PM To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Christopher Masto; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John W. DeBoskey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: -current kernel proble

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
:>> int devminor; /* minor number */ :>> :>> devminor = minor(dev); :>> +dev->si_bsize_phys = DEV_BSIZE; :>> +dev->si_bsize_best = BLKDEV_IOSIZE; :>> +dev->si_bsize_max = MAXBSIZE; :> :>Bingo! Thank you. : :Cool, I expect grog will comm

Re: "The Matrix" screensaver, v.0.2

1999-08-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message <15454.935598612@localhost> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : I think people are being almost clinically paranoid here. Hasbro and : folks got upset over TRADEMARK infringement, e.g. from using a name : they had trademarked. I rather doubt that Warner Bros. have managed : to trademark th

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Masto writes: >> Index: vinum.c >> === >> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c,v >> retrieving revision 1.29 >> diff -u -r1.29 vinum.c >> --- vinum.c 1999/08/24 02:18:55 1.29

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Christopher Masto
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:04:44PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Ok, I havn't touched vinum (grog generally want to do this himself), > the fix is probably something like this: > > Index: vinum.c > === > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John W. DeBoskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I need to figure out why my 11:30am EST cvsup didn't pick > this file up. It's 44 minutes infront of cvsup... Most mirror sites update themselves hourly from cvsup-master, which updates itself every 6 minutes from

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Christopher Masto
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:04:44PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >Well, I just had much the same blowup with source from last night > >and I'm using vinum, (and not vn or ccd). > > > >Recompiling now to see if it's still there. > > Ok, I havn't touched vinum (grog generally want to do this hi

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Masto writes: >On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:35:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >> >That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures. >> > >> >You will note that wi

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Christopher Masto
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:35:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: > >That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures. > > > >You will note that with John's failure's the I/O is properly page-aligned. > >Th

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures. > >You will note that with John's failure's the I/O is properly page-aligned. >The fix to ccd deals with a misalignment problem. No it doesn't. johns failur

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul ian Elischer writes: > > >On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> >> The size and resid of 0 is because it decides to use a sectorsize of >> zero due to the si_bsize fields being empty. > >yes, but didn't I just see you commit a fix for that? To ccd

tentative fix (was Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault))

1999-08-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
The first part of this patch is not yet part of my multipatch at http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ This is a tentative fix, but I believe it to be correct. Until yesterday I was testing swap-backed VN with only one swap partition, otherwise this would have been found and fi

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures. You will note that with John's failure's the I/O is properly page-aligned. The fix to ccd deals with a misalignment problem. But I believe I have found the problem... it is a bug in vm/swap_pager.c that o

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Julian Elischer
Ah my mistake, it was ccd. I remembered vn. I guess vinum, vn, and ccd need all have the correct bisize code.. On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, John W. DeBoskey wrote: > which would be this commit... > > phk 1999/08/26 07:46:11 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/dev/ccd ccd.c >

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread John W. DeBoskey
which would be this commit... phk 1999/08/26 07:46:11 PDT Modified files: sys/dev/ccd ccd.c Log: Initialize the dev->si_bsize fields. Submitted by: tegge Reviewed by: phk Revision ChangesPath 1.53 +5 -1 src/sys/dev/ccd/ccd.c I need t

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > The size and resid of 0 is because it decides to use a sectorsize of > zero due to the si_bsize fields being empty. yes, but didn't I just see you commit a fix for that? > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul > ian Elischer writes: > >swapp

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Julian Elischer
I am positive that I just saw a checkin from phk that initialised the initial default transfer size. On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :swapping on a vn device? > :the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious. > : > :a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may fix this if that'

Re: Docs blows up make release

1999-08-26 Thread Nik Clayton
-stable, -current, On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 11:05:11AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > [ cc'd to -current ] > > On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 07:54:51PM -0400, jack wrote: > > > > Will support for building release docs in English only be > > revived? > > > > For the immediate future, it looks like it wi

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
The size and resid of 0 is because it decides to use a sectorsize of zero due to the si_bsize fields being empty. In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul ian Elischer writes: >swapping on a vn device? >the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious. > >a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Matthew Dillon
:swapping on a vn device? :the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious. : :a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may fix this if that's your :problem. A fix was? When? Where? What? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Julian Elischer
swapping on a vn device? the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious. a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may fix this if that's your problem. On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, John W. DeBoskey wrote: > Hi, > >Following up my own mail on sig 11 problems, I beleive the > problem is kernel re

Re: -current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread Julian Elischer
fixed earlier today... On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, John W. DeBoskey wrote: > Hi, > >Following up my own mail on sig 11 problems, I beleive the > problem is kernel related. Running a kernel with sources current > as of 11:30am EST, I get the following during a make world: > > spec_getpages: I/O r

-current kernel problems (spec_getpages & vm_fault)

1999-08-26 Thread John W. DeBoskey
Hi, Following up my own mail on sig 11 problems, I beleive the problem is kernel related. Running a kernel with sources current as of 11:30am EST, I get the following during a make world: spec_getpages: I/O read failure: (error code=0) bp 0xc3700ec8 vp 0xc92ce000 size: 0, resid

Re: make world failure (signal 11 in cpp)

1999-08-26 Thread John W. DeBoskey
Hi folks, To answer my own question, I came into work this morning and found my console full of messages... spec_getpages: I/O read failure: (error code=0) bp 0xc36fe9a0 vp 0xc92ce000 size: 0, resid: 0, a_count: 4096, valid: 0x0 nread: 0, reqpage: 0, pindex: 9, p

Re: 3C597 fast ethernet support

1999-08-26 Thread Nick Hilliard
> I've got a 100Mbit 3COM EISA ethernet interface. Here are the particulars: > > vx0: <3Com 3C597-TX Network Adapter> at 0x5000-0x501f, 0x5c80-0x5c89 > vx0: irq 12 (edge) on eisa0 slot 5 > > I've been running it for a while now at 10Mbit. From what I can gather, the > vx driver doesn't support

Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-26 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > The USA... your prices tend to be a lot better than ours. I could can the > > T2P4 but that would also mean I had to can the SIMMs (everything is DIMMs > > now), get an AGP videocard and can the perfectly fine Millenium II (I need > > the extra PCI

K6-2 motherboards Was, Re: Softupdates reliability?

1999-08-26 Thread Anthony Kimball
[moved to chat] : > Yes, you stand a far better chance of making this hack work with a 66MHz : > part.No the newer std parts are not designed to run with a 66MHz FSB, : > you should always order them as /66. Note that AMD has stopped making : > these chips due to low demand for them (with 10

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-26 Thread Doug Rabson
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > This is probably because our server detects that the directory has been > > modified and rejects the solaris client's directory cookies. > > I think we should not ever reject a client's cookie. Consider a local > program