Loss of Functionality with newpnp

1999-09-25 Thread Donald J . Maddox
The new PnP code just plain does not work for my PnP AWE64. If I configure like this: controller pnp0 controller snd0 device sb0 device sbxvi0 device sbmidi0 device awe0 device opl0 device joy0 Which is the way it *should* work, in

make world, attempt 5

1999-09-25 Thread Greg Lehey
I've been trying for the last 24 hours solid to make a new world. The latest problem is: ===> libwrap cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DFACILITY=LOG_AUTH -DHOSTS_ACCESS -DNETGROUP -DDAEMON_UMASK=022 -DREAL_DAEMON_DIR=\"/usr/libexec\" -DPROCESS_OPTIONS -DSEVERITY=LOG_INFO -DRFC931_TIMEOUT=10 -DHOSTS_D

Re: ATA drivers - HOWTO?

1999-09-25 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Thomas Veldhouse wrote: > Hello, > > I have noticed over time that many people are test driving the new > ATA > Drivers. I attempted to do it a while back but I couldn't boot because of > the device name changes. I did not know what the new device names were. > Anyway - is there

ATA drivers - HOWTO?

1999-09-25 Thread Thomas Veldhouse
Hello, I have noticed over time that many people are test driving the new ATA Drivers. I attempted to do it a while back but I couldn't boot because of the device name changes. I did not know what the new device names were. Anyway - is there a simple HOWTO for using these drivers - and

Re: Filtering port 25 (was Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups)

1999-09-25 Thread Gary Palmer
Jacques Vidrine wrote in message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This prevents your customers from being something that could get you > > on the RBL or the DUL MAP for bad behavior, it also inforces the use > > of your smart host relay, as it/they is/are the only way to get a > > tcp port 25 setup com

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-25 Thread Pat Lynch
Actually, I should clarify, my dialup is actually dedicated. not dialup-when-I-need-it. don;t know if this makes a diofference but I pay ALOT of money for the use of my own guaranteed modem 24/7. -Pat ___ Pat Lynch

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
Just some numbers that I got with a small testsuite. This is the setiathome client running on an AMD Athlon-500 (K7), FreeBSD 4.0-current (as of 1999-09-18). Of course, I've used the same work unit for all tests. I also changed the code to stop after a certain amount of data has processed, beca

Re: another error

1999-09-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Murray writes: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kenne >th >> Wayne Culver writes: >> >I cvsupped about 20 minutes ago and now I get this message when I su to >> >root, or when I start xwindows. It doesn't seem to be hurting anything >> >though: >> > >> >Warn

Re: another error

1999-09-25 Thread Mark Murray
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kenne th > Wayne Culver writes: > >I cvsupped about 20 minutes ago and now I get this message when I su to > >root, or when I start xwindows. It doesn't seem to be hurting anything > >though: > > > >Warning:tty: no si_tty > > > >Is it anything to worry about? >

Re: another error

1999-09-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kenneth Wayne Culver writes: >I cvsupped about 20 minutes ago and now I get this message when I su to >root, or when I start xwindows. It doesn't seem to be hurting anything >though: > >Warning:tty: no si_tty > >Is it anything to worry about? I'm not quite sure ye

Re: DDB && SMP?

1999-09-25 Thread Matthew Jacob
Thanks, that did the trick. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: wierd message

1999-09-25 Thread Mike Smith
> what does this message mean? > Sep 24 18:34:04 culverk /kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 127.0.0.1rt > > I've been getting it alot since I reinstalled -current, it never used to > happen before. Check that you haven't got a bogusly-detected lnc interface with an all-1's ethernet

another error

1999-09-25 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
I cvsupped about 20 minutes ago and now I get this message when I su to root, or when I start xwindows. It doesn't seem to be hurting anything though: Warning:tty: no si_tty Is it anything to worry about? = | Kenneth Culver

Beneath The Planet Of The Mondays

1999-09-25 Thread Bill Paul
Uh, hello? Hi? Is this thing on? *tap* *tap* *squeel!* Oops, sorry. Listen, does anybody have any idea why there hasn't been a -current snapshot on current.freebsd.org since Septembet 18th? Anyone? People do realize that make release is not the same as make buildworld, and are testing the

ata driver

1999-09-25 Thread Kenneth Culver
I have been testing the ata driver recently, and I have noticed this message (along with not being able to access that hard drive after the message) ata0_slave: lost contact with device - resetting. then it says it's reset, but nothing can access the disk... I've gone back to the wdc drivers fo

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-25 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> yes, Dynamic dialups are the real problems. I have a static dialup, and > its essentially mine to do with what I want. its not counted among my > ISP's dialup pools. And if you signed the additional clauses to our AUP that basically places you at legal and financial risk for violation of the ot

Panic with BT Speedway / AVM Fritz!PCI ISDN

1999-09-25 Thread Mark Knight
Until installing a BT Speedway (AVM Fritz!PCI), ISDN card, my early August 4.0-C box was stable. Since then, I've had numerous panics, complete with advice to increase NTPBUFFERS / maxusers. Despite a new world as of 5/9/99 and greatly increased kernel parameters the panics have not been eliminat

curses: wrap on write to last column ?

1999-09-25 Thread Hellmuth Michaelis
Hi, i have identical applications using curses running on 3.x and a current as of today. On 3.x, the application is able to write to the last column (on an xterm) without automatically wrapping the cursor to the next line, on -current it does wrap to the next line (causing a blank line to be in

Re: wierd message

1999-09-25 Thread Dmitrij Tejblum
Kenneth Culver wrote: > what does this message mean? > Sep 24 18:34:04 culverk /kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 127.0.0.1rt I don't know how you got it, but here is an easy way to do so: In /etc/rc.conf: network_interfaces="ed0 lo0" ifconfig_ed0="DHCP" (ed0 apparently can be repla

Re: Boot problems with new -current

1999-09-25 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > I'm trying to update my -current system compiled from July 12 (both > kernel and base system). But before all system updating I have tried to > compile and run new kernel from today (September 25) - and it won't > boot so I'm afraid to update all the system... > B

Re: Boot problems with new -current

1999-09-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Your disk claims to have bad144 enabled, the ata driver doesn't support this. If you need bad144 support (ESDI or ST506 disks, you can recognize them by the two ribbon cables and their 8+ years of age) you need to use the wd driver. Otherwise you need to fix your disklabel (by booting with the

Boot problems with new -current

1999-09-25 Thread Cejka Rudolf
I'm trying to update my -current system compiled from July 12 (both kernel and base system). But before all system updating I have tried to compile and run new kernel from today (September 25) - and it won't boot so I'm afraid to update all the system... Booting ends with these lines: wd0: bad

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-25 Thread Pat Lynch
yes, Dynamic dialups are the real problems. I have a static dialup, and its essentially mine to do with what I want. its not counted among my ISP's dialup pools. ___ Pat Lynch [E

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-25 Thread Ben Smithurst
[ CC list trimmed ] Pat Lynch wrote: > DUL, while I'm not sure whether we should take this to -chat or not since > we are now getting into noise on the -current list, is also a good thing. > simply because noone on a dialup has reason to be sending mail directly to > me, they should be sending i

Re: System crash on "vinum start"

1999-09-25 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:36:54PM -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote: > > D d0State: up Device /dev/da0eAvail: 0/17366 MB >(0%) > D d1State: up Device /dev/da1eAvail: 0/17366 MB >(0%) > D d2State: up Device /

Re: XFree86-3.3.5/kde-1.1.2/Current today.

1999-09-25 Thread Edwin Culp
Thank you Ian. I had no problem with it in 3.3.4 and I don´t remember what configuration I had but it didn´t work with 3.3.5. From your description the problem is the same. I´m going to play with the card today, but will probably follow your example. I´ver already spent too much time with this

Re: XFree86-3.3.5/kde-1.1.2/Current today.

1999-09-25 Thread Ian Dowse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edwin Culp writes: > >libraries, I decided as a last resort to substitute the SiS-6326 that worked >flawlessly on 3.3.4. I changed it for a Matrox G200 and ran xf86config and >it worked perfectly with no other changes and everything else the same. >Looks like the S

wierd message

1999-09-25 Thread Kenneth Culver
what does this message mean? Sep 24 18:34:04 culverk /kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 127.0.0.1rt I've been getting it alot since I reinstalled -current, it never used to happen before. Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre

Re: Automating filesystem check at boot time

1999-09-25 Thread John Saunders
Bill Fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > You need to find and fix what ever it is that is not dieing when being > > told to die. Your work around is a bandaid that only hides the real > > problem, which is probably a bug some place in something

Re: pcm oddity

1999-09-25 Thread Dave J. Boers
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 11:52:26PM -0400, Wes Morgan wrote: > I noticed a little quirk in the pcm driver -- it is reversing the channels > in my sb16! The first couple times I play a certain mp3 that starts out > (normally) in the left channel, it plays correctly in the left channel. > Then sudde