Re: Compiler error XFree86-Server

2002-08-10 Thread Marc Recht
> Yes. But our 5.0-RELEASE is will non-polished; so I think having the > compiler in the same shape is OK if it means we can get bugs fixed and > our needs taken care of. But it's still a relase. :-) > Many IA-64, and AMD x86-64 bug fixes and improvements aren't merged back > to the 3.{1,2} bran

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: phk malloc() sometimes forget to set errno

2002-08-10 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I doubt about choosed EPERM code. According to intro(2) it refers to some > priviledges required for operation, but recursive call is not restricted > due to priviledges. What about of other code, like EFAULT? Not

Re: Interrupt vs. polling on -current

2002-08-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: > No, but the 3Com driver apparently is. The sio driver wants to have > fast interrupts. It can't have them with the irq is shared, so its > worst-case interrupt latency for a single serial port is increased > from about 50 usec to many msec, depending other interrupt activity

gcc version question

2002-08-10 Thread Faried Nawaz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, gcc in -current is a prerelease -- dated just a few days before gcc 3.1 was released. Will it be upgraded to 3.1 proper (or maybe 3.2) before 5.0's officially out? Faried. - -- The Great GNU has arrived, infidels, behold his wrath ! If I

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with dump(8) on -current?

2002-08-10 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: >I don't know how open() of a disk device can be interrupted by a signal >in practice. Most disk operations don't check for signals. Considering that opening a disk-device cannot be guaranteed to succeed in finite time (think SAN, SCSI over IP

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with dump(8) on -current?

2002-08-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Leiding > er writes: > >Have a look at Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >(should be in the archive of audit). > > Ah, I had forgotten about that -audit thread. > > >Short: open shouldn't be able to return EINTR in

Re: Rewrite of the perl script rmuser to C

2002-08-10 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 03:59:42PM +0200, Morten Rodal wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:02:39PM +0200, Eirik Nygaard wrote: > > I have just rewritten the rmuser perl script to C, it would be > > great if you could take a look at it and check if everything is ok. > > You should probably repla

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with dump(8) on -current?

2002-08-10 Thread Ian Dowse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Leiding er writes: >Have a look at Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >(should be in the archive of audit). Ah, I had forgotten about that -audit thread. >Short: open shouldn't be able to return EINTR in practice... > >My assumptions: > - Bruce hasn't made

Re: Rewrite of the perl script rmuser to C

2002-08-10 Thread Morten Rodal
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:02:39PM +0200, Eirik Nygaard wrote: > I have just rewritten the rmuser perl script to C, it would be > great if you could take a look at it and check if everything is ok. You should probably replace the strcpy() and strcat() with strlcpy(3) and strlcat(3), or at least

ftpd problem: Input/output error

2002-08-10 Thread Gavin Atkinson
Hi, For a few months now I have been seeing the following problems with the ftpd in current. When transferring a large file, ftpd seems to consistantly fail after almost all of the file hass been transferred. The example transcript below shows all but 4096 bytes of a file being transferred befor

Re: Is anyone else having trouble with dump(8) on -current?

2002-08-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:07:28 +0100 Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just looking at PR bin/18319 when I remembered this message. > Many of the changes in your patch are not necessary I believe, as > read(2) will restart after a signal by default. How about just > fixing the open call

Are you ready to Invest now

2002-08-10 Thread konar_adrienne
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00D0_85E10D4E.D7384B52"

Rewrite of the perl script rmuser to C

2002-08-10 Thread Eirik Nygaard
I have just rewritten the rmuser perl script to C, it would be great if you could take a look at it and check if everything is ok. How do I get this commited? -- Eirik Nygaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: 83C55EDE /* ** -*- perl -*- ** Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997 Guy Helmer, Ames, Iowa 5001

Re: Interrupt vs. polling on -current

2002-08-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > OS: FreeBSD-current DP1 (dmesg attached) > Laptop: Toshiba Tecra 8100 (docked) > Hardware: 3Com Bluetooth USB dongle, 3Com Bluetooth PC-CARD > Xircom CBT PC-CARD (with 16550A UART) > > First of all, irq 11 gets shared between PC-CARD control

Webcams!...

2002-08-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Saturday, August 10, 2002 at 00:27:43 --- gjbzsoz: Hi, just got done putting up the cams, so come and take a look htt