In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: At Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:33:47 + (UTC),
: Nicolas Christin wrote:
: > I just tried to give a shot to 5.0-RC2 on an old box of mine that can
: > only perform network installs (no CD drive). During the boot proce
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: 2. 3Com 3c905.
this is a cardbus card?
: # ifconfig xl0 mediaopt 100baseTX
: ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA: Device not configured
User error: You must specify media if you are going to specify media
this
before, when I had tried replacing the Ethernet card). Then there was a
660 machine check, then the SRM
crashed--http://people.freebsd.org/~trevor/alpha/4100-20030116-cu2.log>.
-- begin log --
(noperiph:sym1:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset detected.
sym1: unable to abort current chip opera
This is not surprising, ACPI also fails on my FIC motherboard,
I lost floppy drive when I enable ACPI, fdc0 can not allocate resources,
sigh.
David Xu
--
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regen
If memory serves me right, Joao Pedras wrote:
> Will there be a RELENG_5 where we would get 5.0-STABLE ? Pretty much in the s
> ame
> way it has been up until now...
Yes, but not right away. Please see the early adopter's guide for more
on this point (it's EARLY.HTM in the top-level directory o
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
I'm trying to use dump -L option to dump with snapshot on
-current/RELENG_5_0 family.
I found dump -L needs writable permission to the device (that's
reasonable because it *writes* snapshot file). But when I try to dump
by operator group, it's impossible to dump with -L option (target
device has
Hi all
Will there be a RELENG_5 where we would get 5.0-STABLE ? Pretty much in the same
way it has been up until now...
Is this code currently tagged with RELENG_5_0 ?
Please cc: me on your reply as I am not on this list.
Tkx
--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:39:36AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote the words in effect of:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> > Before adding the ccd line to my kernel configuration file, I had
> > attempted to run ccdconfig while using just the GENERIC kernel (also
> > 5.0-RC3). I suppos e I
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:58:04PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote the words in effect of:
> On Wed, 2003/01/15 at 20:20:33 +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:05:20PM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > > Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > > I've partially ported the NetBSD busdma cod
Hello,
Has anyone besides me experienced mpg123 dumping core on recent (from
10/01/03 builds and on) -CURRENT builds? I was using it perfectly,
then I reinstalled the port to include a couple of cosmetic patches
of mine (they don't do ANYTHING that could cause this - it's only to
change
Hi there,
problem isn't REALLY agp related, it is just because the PCI bridge tries to
use some resources the BIOS left off or that are not enabled correctly by
the device driver. There is a tunable value you can set to 0 to avoid this,
just hit spacebar when loader prompts it and type :
hw.pci.e
At 04:22 AM 1/16/03 -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
>--On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:15 PM +0100 Wilko Bulte
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:12:30AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, wade wrote:
>>> > Although GENERIC functions perfectly, when I enable S
On Thursday 16 January 2003 23:14, Sean Kelly wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure this belongs on -CURRENT, but I couldn't find
> any KDE specific list similar to -gnome
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will get you there.
> and I seem to recall that the
> building of KDE3 was a desired goal for FreeBSD 5.0.
It is.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:25PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure this belongs on -CURRENT, but I couldn't find any
> KDE specific list similar to -gnome and I seem to recall that the building
> of KDE3 was a desired goal for FreeBSD 5.0. That said, I apologize in
> advance if thi
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Sean Kelly wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure this belongs on -CURRENT, but I couldn't find any
> KDE specific list similar to -gnome and I seem to recall that the building
> of KDE3 was a desired goal for FreeBSD 5.0. That said, I apologize in
> advance if this is the wrong place
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:25PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote:
...
> Is it just me, or does x11/kdebase3 (3.0.5) not build on 5.0-STABLE?
...
Yes, I screwed up. I meant 5.0-CURRENT. Was thinking of impending
5.0-RELEASE.
--
Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.zom
Considering stable has yet to be released...
I have had no problem getting KDE3.0.5 installed on different machines all
running 5.0-CURRENT (as of the time of kde3 build, it was latest off of
cvsup2). Granted, it takes forever to install, but beyond that, it's no
problem installing. I must also
I'm not entirely sure this belongs on -CURRENT, but I couldn't find any
KDE specific list similar to -gnome and I seem to recall that the building
of KDE3 was a desired goal for FreeBSD 5.0. That said, I apologize in
advance if this is the wrong place to take this.
Is it just me, or does x11/kdeba
Mike Tibor writes:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> (I wrote: )
> > > I believe a 670 machine check can also result from a read of a
> > > non-existent I/O space. I'm not a programmer, but could that be the
> > > problem here?
> >
> > No, that's a 660. (system machine
Hey Rich,
Thanks for the pointer, but I'm still a no go. ACPI or not, the kernel
hangs in the same place, pcib0: slot 7 INTD is routed to irq 11.
I appreciate the pointer.
Cheers,
Ryan
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 06:17:42PM -0500, Rich Cavanaugh wrote:
> Hey, just thought I'd let you know
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:48:12AM -0900, Mike Tibor wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> (I wrote: )
> > > I believe a 670 machine check can also result from a read of a
> > > non-existent I/O space. I'm not a programmer, but could that be the
> > > problem here?
> >
> > N
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
(I wrote: )
> > I believe a 670 machine check can also result from a read of a
> > non-existent I/O space. I'm not a programmer, but could that be the
> > problem here?
>
> No, that's a 660. (system machine check).
> A 670 is much more likely to be b
Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Peter Schultz wrote:
>
> >ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, E_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
> >can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.FDC0 - AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
> >
> >I have a Tyan S1834 and see the above error during boot. I'm not
> >sure i
Here is another machine that the ISO for 5.0-RC3 x86 won't boot on.
The hardware is a SGI VW 230 (mostly ACER hardware based on the VIA chipset).
I've attached some detailed information out about both machines from
the linux point of view. Hope that it helps.
Cheers,
Ryan
> Still no lu
Sorry for a lack of details here, but -- sometime in the last few ACPI
imports (perhaps in the last three months), one of my test boxes began to
spew the attached message:
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_
Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Repeat: These machines work fine under Windows; the problem
> > is not the BIOS, it's the OS's ASL interpreter.
>
> There's another wrinkle in that the interpreter is supplied by Intel.
> Some difficulties were _introduced_ by them
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" wrote:
> > You might ask that question on the ACPI development list. I think there
> > are several people who have contributed patched ASL's for machines that
> > are broken. Here's a link:
> >
> > Acpi-devel mailing list
>
"Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" wrote:
> You might ask that question on the ACPI development list. I think there
> are several people who have contributed patched ASL's for machines that
> are broken. Here's a link:
>
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/list
"Joel M. Baldwin" wrote:
> I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
> on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
> can't run ACPI.
>
> What are those of us with these motherboards supposed to to?
>
> I realize that we can use acpidump to get th
Hi,
I am having trouble witha i810 chipset running a 633 mhz celeron
machine.
After turning of acpi using unset acpi_load and set
hint.acpi.0.disabled=1 I proceed to booting
using -Dhv, after viewing over the console I see that everything boots
fine until
start_init: trying /stand/sysinsta
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:46:46AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> > It sound like a good idea. However, there is a lot of isssues evolved.
> > First, a DSDT table can and will be generated autmatically on the POST,
> > because at least the memory controller
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a brutal workaround (use a single 8254 clock and simulate the RTC
> clock), but it breaks some things (eg: high res profiling). I really dont
> like it, and I'm working on a different possibility as well (keep the 8259
> PIC alive and use it in ExtI
Hi Sam,
The new "device wlan" option is pushing the kern.flp over the limit
during make release. Maybe it can be moved to mfsroot.flp?
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the m
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> It sound like a good idea. However, there is a lot of isssues evolved.
> First, a DSDT table can and will be generated autmatically on the POST,
> because at least the memory controller can have different configurations
> depending on the total amount of
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Peter Schultz wrote:
> ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, E_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
> can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.FDC0 - AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
>
> I have a Tyan S1834 and see the above error during boot. I'm not sure
> if this is such a big problem
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> Before adding the ccd line to my kernel configuration file, I had
> attempted to run ccdconfig while using just the GENERIC kernel (also
> 5.0-RC3). I suppos e I shouldn't have been surprised that it didn't work:
>
> -- begin log --
> # ccdconfig ccd0
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 07:35:35AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:07:45AM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
> > I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
> > on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
> > can't run ACPI.
> >
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >...
> > to your config files. This probably belongs in UPDATING.
>
> NB the new wi(4) is probably also an issue for ports/net/bsd-airtools,
> to be resolved or documented before MFC. (copied maintainer)
Why, did they not work/build after the commit?
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, E_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.FDC0 - AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL
I have a Tyan S1834 and see the above error during boot. I'm not sure
if this is such a big problem but it would be nice to eliminate the error.
Thank
While trying to debug a linux sound driver on my new ASUS A7V8X
mobo I changed the Plug-n-Play OS setting from 'no' to 'yes'
in the BIOS.
When I rebooted the machine back into FreeBSD I got watchdog
timer error messages from the Broadcom (bge) ethernet driver
and the network was unreachable in spi
Still no luck. I pulled both cards and with our with out ACPI, the system
stops at:
pci_cfgintr: 0:7 INTD routed to irq 14
Cheers,
Ryan
> It would probably help to know there is an Intel EtherExpress/100 card as
> well as a PCI Voodoo3 Video Card in the system.
To Unsubscribe: sen
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Sam Leffler wrote:
>...
> to your config files. This probably belongs in UPDATING.
NB the new wi(4) is probably also an issue for ports/net/bsd-airtools,
to be resolved or documented before MFC. (copied maintainer)
Magnus
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:27:37AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> I was doing the "dd" in an attempt to follow the recipe posted by Andre
> Albsmeier on
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&th=440939b0f4db6bdb&seekm=arg34b%2410hi%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&frame=off>.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matt Hartzell wrote:
> I had issues with 4.7 Release and the Adaptec 2120 as well. I installed
> 5.0 RC3 using the ISO image and both my 2120 and 2200 controllers are
> working fine.
>
> I don't know what use you are putting this server to, might CURRENT be a
> solution? Aft
[From address modified because I don't want every message in this
thread to end up in my personal mailbox. I'll read them in the
list, thank you.]
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:07:45AM -0800, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
> I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
> on them. I
Sorry, for the new wi driver you need to add:
device wlan
to your config files. This probably belongs in UPDATING.
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Haught" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new wi driver
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:44:20AM -0600, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote:
> You might ask that question on the ACPI development list. I think there
> are several people who have contributed patched ASL's for machines that
> are broken. Here's a link:
>
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECT
On 16-Jan-2003 Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> I'm not sure where to ask this. 5.0 isn't released yet so I don't think
> questions is the place but since it's on a laptop I'll try here. If
> there's a better list for it, let me know and I'll bounce it there too.
> Just before sending this I also inc
I had issues with 4.7 Release and the Adaptec 2120 as well. I installed
5.0 RC3 using the ISO image and both my 2120 and 2200 controllers are
working fine.
I don't know what use you are putting this server to, might CURRENT be a
solution? After compiling my kernel with out debugging options turn
You might ask that question on the ACPI development list. I think there
are several people who have contributed patched ASL's for machines that
are broken. Here's a link:
Acpi-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
> -Original Message---
Mike Tibor writes:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Trevor Johnson wrote:
>
> > I just got a similar crash:
> >
> >unexpected machine check:
> >
> >mces= 0x1
> >vector = 0x670
> I believe a 670 machine check can also result from a read of a
> non-existent I/O space. I'm
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:12 AM -0800 "Joel M. Baldwin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to do a 'make release' the last couple of weeks and
keep getting the following error.
geeze time for a coffee. sorry people. here is the error.
===> chinese/mozilla-tclp
===> Crea
I've been trying to do a 'make release' the last couple of weeks and
keep getting the following error.
Is this something on my end? I assume other aren't having problems
with it being this close to release date.
Any suggestions on the fix?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
I gather that there are quite a few Motherboards with bad ACPI asl's
on them. I know that my Abit BP6 sure has problems. As a result I
can't run ACPI.
What are those of us with these motherboards supposed to to?
I realize that we can use acpidump to get the asl, correct it,
and then recompile
--On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:15 PM +0100 Wilko Bulte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:12:30AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, wade wrote:
> Although GENERIC functions perfectly, when I enable SMP in
> GENERIC, the box freezes during big build jobs ( i.e. b
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:39:22 -0800
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "The tool costs $699 and Intel said it will be available in February."
>
> That would make it somewhat difficult, no?
lang/icc also does cost money, but Intel has a "free for non-commercial
use" license for it.
If Int
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> This is a known issue that I am working on correcting. Right now there
> is no workaround that I know of. Stay tuned =-)
>
> Scott
What can i do ??
I want FreeBSD not Linux as my server...
and 4.7 is the best candidate for it...
Thanks in advance
Andrz
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> I just got a similar crash:
>
> unexpected machine check:
>
> mces= 0x1
> vector = 0x670
> param = 0xfc004e10
> pc = 0xfc4069bc
> ra = 0xfc4069b4
>
Andrzej Kwiatkowski wrote:
Hello..
I would like to install 4.7-Release on my Intel 1210 server.
I've got Adaptec 2120s iserted and two 72Gb disk
configured as Raid 1. When i start to install everything is ok,
but when system boots i've got :
**MONITOR** NormPrioCommand was received with Fib Str
Hello..
I would like to install 4.7-Release on my Intel 1210 server.
I've got Adaptec 2120s iserted and two 72Gb disk
configured as Raid 1. When i start to install everything is ok,
but when system boots i've got :
**MONITOR** NormPrioCommand was received with Fib StructType=0xb0
**MONITOR** Nor
I wrote:
> "dd if=zero of=da2"
I forgot to mention that after the crash, the LED on disk da2 remains lit,
as is the one on da0 (which contains /, /tmp, /usr, and /var but not
/home). When I had the same disk drives attached to a PC, I could write
to them at about 45 kilobytes per second. Multip
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Time to check the fan for the CPU, and the air'tunnel' feeding the
> air to the heatsink. I had one come loose after servicing the machine.
I just got a similar crash:
unexpected machine check:
mces= 0x1
vector = 0x670
param
64 matches
Mail list logo
