/home/des/tinderbox/tinderbox.sh: /home/des/tinderbox/whereintheworld: not found
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 18:38, Greg Lehey wrote:
Did you use shutdown -p? If my hypothesis is correct, it's possible
to get this result with shutdown -h if you press the power switch as
soon as the System halted message appears, but normally you'd give
it a few seconds longer. With shutdown
Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point.
lock order reversal
1st 0xc4123858 process lock (process lock) @ ../../../kern/kern_descrip.c:2104
2nd 0xc411ee34 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ ../../../kern/kern_des
crip.c:2111
Debugger(witness_lock)
Stopped at
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Enache Adrian writes:
I get this when I try to access for the first time a file on an ext2fs
filesystem.
VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR
Please try this patch and let me know if it helps ?
Index: ext2_vnops.c
===
Since the locking is wrong anyhow...
Index: kern_descrip.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c,v
retrieving revision 1.183
diff -u -r1.183 kern_descrip.c
--- kern_descrip.c 21 Jan 2003 20:20:48 - 1.183
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I would like to
be able to make an SMP kernel use only one CPU. Of course I
realize running GENERIC would only use 1 CPU but the concern is
that the overhead assoicated with SMP
* Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030128 12:50]: wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I would like to
be able to make an SMP kernel use only one CPU. Of course I
realize running GENERIC would only use 1
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:53:49PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
that the overhead assoicated with SMP will skew the statistics.
So my question is what would be the 'best' way to make an SMP
kernel only start/use CPU0?
Yank the others ?
What about building two kernels, one
Hello,
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
quickly and bg fsck worked fine, except for one. I had created a large
(50GB) /export
* De: Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
* Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030128 12:50]: wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I
Hello
FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE panics during the floppies boot with following
messages:
panic: inthand_add: Can't initialize ICU
syncing disks, buffers remaining... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy
The box have two ISA PnP cards - a NIC based on UMC UM9008/F chip and
Creative SB16 based on ViBRA16
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
quickly and bg
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:02:22AM +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
Try to add hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range=1 in your
/boot/loader.conf.local and reboot your machine.
sorry, that didn't help. same effect as before.
is there anything i can do / help with to get this card running?
thanx
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
quickly and bg fsck worked fine,
Try a make build world and see if that version of libc_r works.
It should fix the problem. joseph
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:07, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
Charlie ROOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
root, nor a regular user. Is this a font path problem?
No, it is not.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example platform sgimips implies
options SGIMIPS. Below are patches to makefile glue and config(8)
itself.
I think that using '#ifdef machine' (like #ifdef PC98) is not a good
idea. If it requires, the file should be
From: Atte Peltomaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
If it's long enough to pause the console noticibly, the
next thing
to try is breaking to the debugger -- which might require an NMI
card -- to see what code it's stuck in during the pause.
It's noticeable - if you type under
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
ps2 ? audio
Enabled, Address 530, IRQ 5, DMA 3, SBAddress 220
...
Anything else I may try?
Thanks to all who replied!
Yes, there should be 2 DMA addresses assigned to the 'audio' device.
{0x0001630e, CS423x-PCI}, /*
Hello,
47105 seems to be slightly different from what I saw, because my machine
never paniced; the fsck just hung forever.
It depends. My machine hangs, there's no panic.
I've already written to Kirk McKusick, but it seems that he has a lot
of work, because I didn't get answer.
Ok, then
On 28-Jan-2003 Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-27 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: tunefs using libufs. ]
I'm getting some odd behavior with tunefs (5.0-CURRENT cvsupped and built
Sunday, Jan 26). If a filesystem, rather than an actual device, is
Hi,
I've got ACPI problems. First I've got a little note:
acpi0: AcpiGetSleepTypeData failed - AE_NOT_FOUND
Wouldn't it be a lot more userfriendly to display:
acpi0: Sleep mode type 1 not supported, available modes are: 0 3 4 5
or a similar error. Is such a patch trivial to do ? If so, I'll
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
{0x0001630e, CS423x-PCI}, /* CSC0100 */
unknown: CSC0100 can't assign resources
You've got LOTS of ISA hints specified and they're conflicting with
PNPBIOS devices.
These are the only ones that don't get setup on my
quote who=Juli Mallett
* De: Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data:
2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
* Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030128 12:50]:
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus
wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get the
'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with SMP/APIC.
I want to use the same kernel making as small a change as
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
I don't see it listed in 5.0-RELEASE ERRATA. Several people have now
reported problems with background fsck and in the case Kirk as
original author is loaded with other work I see no justification to
not mention the brokenness of bgfsck.
Hi,
Does FreeBSD-SMP have anything equivalent to the processor_bind(2) call
on Solaris, which binds a process to a specific processor?
http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/816-0212/6m6nd4nci?a=view
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:22:10PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
I've been trying to reproduce this bug on my desktop. This machine has 2
80gb disks, one of which is dedicated with one slice. So far, after 8 hard
resets, I haven't had any problem with either the machine or bgfsck
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:23:08PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
47105 seems to be slightly different from what I saw, because my machine
never paniced; the fsck just hung forever.
It depends. My machine hangs, there's no panic.
Yes, I overlooked that in the PR when I read it first. Mine was
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:34:25PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Following reports of problems with bgfsck during the 5.0-RC series, and
prior to the release, I spent some time adding hard disks to machines,
resetting without clean shutdowns, and then interrupting background fscks,
piles of
Oleg Baranov wrote:
It looks like firewall in 5.0-RELEASE doesn't respect uid option.
I migrated from 4.7 where the following lines worked fine:
allow tcp from me to any uid 500 setup
allow udp from me to any uid 500 keep-state
I couldn't get these lines working on 5.0 (packets don't match
Hello,
I really don't know. I have a SV25 barebone system from Shuttle (VIA
Twister Chipset) and an IBM deskstar 80GB IDE HD. Does that sound
familiar to you?
Nope, mine is completely different.
It is a HP tc4100 (I think it has an Intel MOBO, but I'm not sure) with an
AHA-2940 controller and
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get the
'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:34:25PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Following reports of problems with bgfsck during the 5.0-RC series, and
prior to the release, I spent some time adding hard disks to machines,
resetting without clean shutdowns, and
Dan Nelson schrieb:
In the last episode (Jan 23), Rahul Siddharthan said:
Kenneth Culver wrote:
Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave
things like this in:
options INVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
quote who=Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get
the
'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with
SMP/APIC.
I want to use the same kernel
Unfortunatly, due to a misunderstanding, the last KSE changes were
committed prematurely. Not prtematurely from a functional Point of View,
but prematurely from a perspective of 'checking other architectures'.
The rumour mill has been running wild on this but **AS FAR AS I KNOW**
the breakages
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jul
ian Elischer writes:
The rumour mill has been running wild on this but **AS FAR AS I KNOW**
the breakages have been fixed, since no-one has told me directl of any
current breakages. If you have any breakage from this commit,
PLEASE TELL ME!
I think you should
Hi,
I have the following scenario:
A30p == disk1 == disk2
disk1 and disk2 are identical 200GB disks in an extarnal ICE-cube case.
My dmesg output is attached.
After creating and mounting them as UFS2 filesystems under /mnt/a /mnt/b
and starting a `iozone -s 102400m -r 1024k` in parallel under
* De: Takahashi Yoshihiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example platform sgimips implies
options SGIMIPS. Below are patches to makefile glue
I've only had time to do minimal testing, but no panics anymore with this
patch.
Ken
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro wrote:
I forgot to add below changes.
Please apply this patch and
# make -f Makefile.usbdevs
Cheers
- sanpei
Index: sys/dev/usb/usbdevs
Can this please be committed to or at least prepared as a patch for
RELENG_5_0? I myself consider fixing automount access to 5.0-RELEASE nfs
servers a critical bugfix, but should RE's mileage vary, I'd really like
a patch that I can apply on my server. There is also a PR open about
this which
Hi,
Can this please be committed to or at least prepared as a patch for
RELENG_5_0? I myself consider fixing automount access to 5.0-RELEASE nfs
Feel free to add this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/patches/committed/patch-rpc_oldreply.diff
servers a critical bugfix, but should RE's
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:38:19AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Enache Adrian writes:
I get this when I try to access for the first time a file on an ext2fs
filesystem.
VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR
Please try this patch and let me know if it helps ?
Of course, it
Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
Can this please be committed to or at least prepared as a patch for
RELENG_5_0? I myself consider fixing automount access to 5.0-RELEASE nfs
Feel free to add this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/patches/committed/patch-rpc_oldreply.diff
Ah, thank you ever so
As Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
It already stopped me when accessing /dev/da0, so why try something
more obscure? Sorry, you've lost me.
ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/geom-foot.patch
Just apply it to your local source tree and get on with
Sorry about emailing both lists, as Im not sure which one this falls under.
It's a current machine (5.0-CURRENT) and it's a problem with a port
(net-snmp). Below is what happens:
`VM_METER' undeclared (first use in this function)
Anyone know how to fix this or a way around it?
Regards,
Nick
quote who=Toni Schmidbauer
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:14:36PM +0100, FredBriand wrote:
everything seems OK, but my sound card. In the handbook they
say I must use the MAKEDEV script (as in Linux) but I can't
find it on my disk.
freebsd 5.0 is using devfs(5). so device inodes are created
[sorry -- dropping in the middle of the thread]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:08:30PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
This approach is a really bad one architecturally, in my opinion. It means
there is a lot of duplication of what may all be VERY similar, and it means
that if we had say 5 platforms
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
I just really would like things to be clean, and abstracted, and not waste
anyone's time. Why should we have to duplicate so much code?
I'm not sure platform is
cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I.
-I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:17:49PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
I just really would like things to be clean, and abstracted, and not waste
anyone's time. Why
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:17:49PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
In short, platform provides machinery for a single port of FreeBSD
which represents exactly one MACHINE_ARCH to support a numbe of
different hardware platforms - MACHINE -
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
In short, platform provides machinery for a single port of FreeBSD
which represents exactly one MACHINE_ARCH to support
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:09:36PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:17:49PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
But
that determines what machine is a link to, and files.machine that is
read. So that means that we need to have machine/*.h stubbed in both
algor/ and
I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Jan 27 14:00:00 CST 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EDGEMASTER
...
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad1s1a
cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0
cd0: PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W4012A 1.01 Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
Benno Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
In short, platform provides machinery for a single port of FreeBSD
which
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
So, given that we have MACHINE_ARCH and MACHINE already to our
disposal, I don't get the feeling that we are in need to add
something else because the problem space appears 2D, not 3D.
Right?
That's what I'm trying to
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
So, given that we have MACHINE_ARCH and MACHINE already to our
disposal, I don't get the feeling
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:04:07PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote:
I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable.
See:
http://news.gw.com/freebsd.current/30547
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Got this today... src is fresh from cvsup2
mkdep -f
pend -a-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../crypto/openssh
-I/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../contrib/openpam/include -I
/usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../libpam
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:42:59PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
So, given that we have
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
No, we have not established that.
*sigh*
Is the problem space 2D or 3D?
Define your terms better. I could argue the number of axes very
easily, and you could
Hmm, well, I finally got my first actual system panic which wasn't
obviously caused by my own screwing around. On the console I have:
free inode /usr/cvs/net/64 had 0 blocks
panic: Negative bio_offset (-19038208) on bio 0xce51be28
cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100
Debugger(panic)
Stopped
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:20:13PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
No, we have not established that.
*sigh*
Is the problem space 2D or 3D?
Define your terms
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
We attach lots of meaning to MACHINE. You keep missing that that
is NOT the same as the machine keyword.
And you keep missing that I don't assume that
* De: Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
Benno Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:18, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re:
Anyone know of a way to fix this? A lot of programs will not install (IE:
net-snmp) with the current status. I have yet to find where the location of
the file should be... =\ I have tried a couple of spots for the file to go,
yet it still fails in the same spot. =(
Regards,
Nick H.
[EMAIL
i think my system is building successfully now.. i did 2 things:
1.) deleted my whole src tree, and re-downloaded it
2.) cp /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/idea/idea.h /usr/src/crypto/openssh/
not sure which one fixed it, but it's been building for about 20 minutes, and i think
it's past the
Mike Barcroft wrote:
Benno Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd also like to point out that PowerPC will benefit greatly from this.
PowerPC platforms vary wildly in how they do various things (incl.
endianness in some cases) and so this provides a much cleaner mechanism
to select a set of
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:04:07PM -0600, Sean Kelly wrote:
I just noticed this during bootup. It is repeatable.
See:
http://news.gw.com/freebsd.current/30547
That's a turn your head and cough patch. It admits the code
is broken, and leaves it broken. It also
Let me know how it goes... I may wanna try that
Regards,
Nick H.
Technical Support Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please rate my performance! http://www.supportteam.net/rate.php3
Please submit all new support requests to
http://ticketmonster.hostingsupport.com/
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:01:58PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
We attach lots of meaning to MACHINE. You keep missing that that
is NOT the same as the machine
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
Good. What is the new paradigm?
As explained, you have a master port, to the architecture, assume that
it is mips ok? That's /sys/mips on FreeBSD. Each
Dong Lin writes:
|
| Hi, I have been running etherboot/diskless machines successfully with
| several 4.x releases. Now I have trouble bringing up 5.0 diskless x86
| machines. The same dhcp/nfs/etherboot setup works for 4.x. But the 5.0
| kernel freezes and eventually crashes without printing
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:57:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
Yes, you are following me. But also, you mention that machine
as implemented means what I said it means, but there is other
precident for using it as I say. For example, BSD/OS uses
machine sparc and options SUN4M. NetBSD uses
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:57:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
Yes, you are following me. But also, you mention that machine
as implemented means what I said it
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:14:41PM +0200, Enache Adrian wrote:
please add ext2fs to the modules list in src/sys/modules/Makefile.
It is already there. :-)
Just wrapped by WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE. So you need to add that to your
/etc/make.conf.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:18, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:57:38PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
Yes, you are following me. But also, you mention that machine
as implemented means what I said it means, but there is other
precident for using it as I say. For example,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:37:16PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
but it explcitly means a location, a path. The introduction of
platform is more confusing. First of all it maps to MACHINE,
while we have the machine keyword mapping to something else.
MACHINE is a cpp define and (relatedly)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:54:30PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
It is already there. :-)
Just wrapped by WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE. So you need to add that to your
/etc/make.conf.
It's not the make.conf man page, where can we find these options?
Jiawei Ye
--
Without the userland, the kernel is
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:37:16PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
but it explcitly means a location, a path. The introduction of
platform is more confusing. First
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0800, leafy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:54:30PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
It is already there. :-)
Just wrapped by WANT_EXT2FS_MODULE. So you need to add that to your
/etc/make.conf.
It's not the make.conf man page, where can we find
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:56:10PM +1100, Benno Rice wrote:
No, I see MACHINE_ARCH implied by where you run config. This seems
strange and I'm not completely sure it's a good thing, but
MACHINE_ARCH is defined in /sys/${ARCH}/include/param.h and
defining the architecture in the kernel
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 17:25, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:56:10PM +1100, Benno Rice wrote:
No, I see MACHINE_ARCH implied by where you run config. This seems
strange and I'm not completely sure it's a good thing, but
MACHINE_ARCH is defined in
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:20:52PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
Your proposal affects FreeBSD. I'm having a constructive discussion
about your proposal because I like to understand your point of
view and tell you mine. Childish behaviour does not impress me.
In fact it only tells me that
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:20:52PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
Sorry if you find it childish to want to move on from that sort
of rehashing.
No, I find it
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:32:51PM +1100, Benno Rice wrote:
Agreed. There's an advantage there, but see also my reply to
Juli about the use of machine to mean MACHINE_ARCH and the
use of platform to mean MACHINE. This I don't find appealing.
I can see your point here, but if needed I'd
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:58:53PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
And no, it wasn't really bikeshedding, it just began to feel that
it was just a matter of but I think we should go at it from this
angle when really all I intended to get was whether or not my
code was OK. I fell short there, in
* De: Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Patch to teach config(8) about platforms. ]
You see how the current approach affects other architectures if you
look at the diff for src/sys/conf/kmod.mk. All architectures,
including those that don't have
95 matches
Mail list logo
