Re: devfs and /dev/fd/3

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Olzheim writes: >Hi. > >I've seen the question once before, but it was not answered (on-list ?), >so now that I run in on it, I'd like to know what to do: > >On FreeBSD 4.x, without devfs, the following worked: >( echo foo | tee /dev/fd/3 | tr f F ) 3>&1 > >It s

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:16, Paul Richards wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > Interfaces actually can be added at runtime. Existing objects (i.e. > > objects instantiated before the new interface was added) will continue > > to work as before. If methods fr

Re: devfs and /dev/fd/3

On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Marc Olzheim wrote: MO>Hi. MO> MO>I've seen the question once before, but it was not answered (on-list ?), MO>so now that I run in on it, I'd like to know what to do: MO> MO>On FreeBSD 4.x, without devfs, the following worked: MO>( echo foo | tee /dev/fd/3 | tr f F ) 3>&1 MO> M

Re: devfs and /dev/fd/3

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:30:19PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > Hi. > > I've seen the question once before, but it was not answered (on-list ?), > so now that I run in on it, I'd like to know what to do: > > On FreeBSD 4.x, without devfs, the following worked: > ( echo foo | tee /dev/fd/3 | tr f

devfs and /dev/fd/3

Hi. I've seen the question once before, but it was not answered (on-list ?), so now that I run in on it, I'd like to know what to do: On FreeBSD 4.x, without devfs, the following worked: ( echo foo | tee /dev/fd/3 | tr f F ) 3>&1 It should produce both "foo" and "Foo" FreeBSD 5 with devfs, howe

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > Interfaces actually can be added at runtime. Existing objects (i.e. > objects instantiated before the new interface was added) will continue > to work as before. If methods from the new interface are called on old > objects, the defaul

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > # ./test-libmap /usr/X11R6/bin/ggv libc_r.so.5 > Lookup of "libc_r.so.5" for "/usr/X11R6/bin/ggv" -> "libc_r.so.5" > Looks like its working to me. > >

Re: ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:42:56AM -0700, Jun Su wrote: > Good Explain. > The same problem is in my PCG-R505DC. Yes, it sounds exactly like the problem with my laptop too. -- Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when it has been achieved and wisest of all to know when it

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 13:24, Paul Richards wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:00 am, Paul Richards wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > Pa

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:09:00PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > Notice how thread 1's _m gets set based on the results of the kobj > > > lookup, and we have a race, even if thread1 a

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:01:07AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:00 am, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > : The possible m

Re: ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

Good Explain. The same problem is in my PCG-R505DC. Jun Su --- Iain Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Sony VAIO (PCG-R505TFP) which has an > interrupts related problem (this > problem was previous posted elsewhere as "Weird as* > sound problem"). This problem > has been conf

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > > Notice how thread 1's _m gets set based on the results of the kobj > > lookup, and we have a race, even if thread1 and thread2 took out their > > driver instance locks. > > That means we

ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

Hi, I have a Sony VAIO (PCG-R505TFP) which has an interrupts related problem (this problem was previous posted elsewhere as "Weird as* sound problem"). This problem has been confirmed on at least one other Sony VAIO model (I forget which). They're both Intel i830M chipset based. Basically, the L

Re: our compiler can't convert longlong to float? 5.1-RC1

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:44:38AM +0800, leafy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Post the code it's trying to run. It's possible it's buggy. > > > > Kris > #include > typedef long long longlong; > main() > { > longlong ll=1; > float f; > FILE *fil

Re: SMBFS automounting broken?

I have opened a PR with a cleaner patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=52959 A. -- Seul a un caractère scientifique ce qui peut être réfuté. Ce qui n'est pas réfutable relève de la magie ou de la mystique. - Popper, Karl pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signa

Additions to sys/dev/usb/usbdevs

Hi, I've added definitions for a few of the devices that I have connected up to my system at the moment. Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/>--- usbdevs.origWed Jun 4 18:10:45 2003 +++ usbdevs

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:00 am, Paul Richards wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > : The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're > > : defined in the

Re: Missing file geom_vol_ffs on buildkernel?

Mike Loiterman wrote: > > ===> geom/geom_vol_ffs > I'm getting this error when I buildkernel: > > cd: can't cd to /usr/src/sys/modules/geom/geom_vol_ffs > *** Error code 2 > > Google search just showed that this was added in the beginning of May > '03. Any ideas? cvs update -d -- Skip ___

Re: phoenix crash in libc_r on sparc64

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:15:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > phoenix on my sparc64 crashed while idle with the following: > > Fatal error '_waitq_insert: Already in queue' at line 321 in file > /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 2) > > Any ideas? > > Kris One of

Re: viapropm doesnt like sys/dev/pci.c rev 1.214

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 07:29:31AM +, Nicolas Souchu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:54:30AM -0700, David P. Reese Jr. wrote: > > [...] > > : The datasheet states that the command bits are RW but "fixed at 0". > > > > A snip of code from sys/dev/pci/pci.c:pci_enable_io_method(): > > > >

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: > > > Actually, no it doesn't. I was able to use kern_umtx v 1.3 only if I > > removed atapicam from my kernel config. These patches (now committed?) > > panic the system whether I use atapicam or not. With ke

Missing file geom_vol_ffs on buildkernel?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ===> geom/geom_vol_ffs I'm getting this error when I buildkernel: cd: can't cd to /usr/src/sys/modules/geom/geom_vol_ffs *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/geom. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > > Bryan Liesner wrote: > > It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point > > that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that > > was build in a totally clean environment? > > The changed

Re: A possible bug?

Zbynek Houska wrote: Dear all, when I tryied to mount an iso image over network (using samba) my computer unexpectedly crashed. I issued this command : mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /path/to/my/file/mounted/on-local-machine and since that kernel crashed, no ping response, nothing at all. I've been

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

Scott Long wrote: > Bryan Liesner wrote: > It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point > that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that > was build in a totally clean environment? The changed code is not protecting a traversal of a proc struct me

Re: HD Speed Benchmark

"Sebastian Yepes [ESN]" wrote: > I have made some Benchmark on my inspiron 8500 (Intel 82801DB (ICH4) - > UDMA100) > and i am geting very Bad results on the 5.1, i have got beter results on 5.0 > > dmesg > -- > 5.0R --> http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.0R > 5.1B2 --> http://www.x123.info

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

Paul Richards wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:04:11AM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote: > > And how many times is vfc_register() called? Its not in the > > patch of an I/O operation or anything. Its just a mount time > > overhead which will go through -- a one time thing. > > > > O

Re: viapropm doesnt like sys/dev/pci.c rev 1.214

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:54:30AM -0700, David P. Reese Jr. wrote: [...] > : The datasheet states that the command bits are RW but "fixed at 0". > > A snip of code from sys/dev/pci/pci.c:pci_enable_io_method(): > > pci_set_command_bit(dev, child, bit); > command = PCI_READ_CONFI

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: > Actually, no it doesn't. I was able to use kern_umtx v 1.3 only if I > removed atapicam from my kernel config. These patches (now committed?) > panic the system whether I use atapicam or not. With kern_umtx v1.2 > there is no panic at all, with or wit

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 22:51:59 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: It seems like the [/path/to/exec] and [exec] don't work? ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/libmap-test.tar Untar that in src/libexec/rtld-elf/ cd test/ make ./test-libma

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > It seems like the [/path/to/exec] and [exec] don't work? ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/libmap-test.tar Untar that in src/libexec/rtld-elf/ cd test/ make ./test-libmap /path/to/exec library-name -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:04:11 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:01:52 -0700, David P. Reese Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it do

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:01:52 -0700, David P. Reese Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it doesn't work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong? Make sure that yo

Re: s4bios

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:01:16PM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote: > Hello Mark, I may not be totally correct, but it has always > helped me to check if a particular ACPI state was supported by > my system: > > # sysctl hw.acpi.supported_sleep_state > hw.ac

Re: s4bios on Dell Latitude C640

I gave it a final try and mounted an empty disk into my laptop. Using the MKS2D.EXE found on the Dell support site I created a hibernation partition on the beginning of the disk (It needs to be within 8 GB of the start of the disk). And guess what... I can now suspend to disk using "acpiconf -s 4

Re: s4bios

On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 06:17:10PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:03:19 -0400 > > From: The Anarcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I put my test results in: > > > > http://anarcat.ath.cx/acpi-test/ > > > > I have done other tests using a build

Re: fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 23:00:21 +0200 > From: Tobias Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi > > I still get a > > fxp0: device timeout > > on my Thinkpad T30 with a newly installed 5.1BETA2. Browsing the > archives showed that people had success with > > hint.fxp.0.pref

Re: s4bios

> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:03:19 -0400 > From: The Anarcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I put my test results in: > > http://anarcat.ath.cx/acpi-test/ > > I have done other tests using a build made after the recent ACPI > import and bugfixes, and I will update the info the

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it doesn't > work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong? Make sure that you have rev 1.6 of src/libexec/rtld-elf/libmap.c. It fixes a bug in the libmap

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

On 2003-06-04 10:15 +, Matthew Gardiner wrote: > >> > > Just a quick question, what version of GCC is going to appear in FreeBSD > 5.1? I heard that it maybe GCC 3.2.3 and that GCC 3.3 (depending on its > stability) will be used for 5.2. Could someone either confirm or correct me > on this ass

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:15:41AM +1000, Matthew Gardiner wrote: > >> > >> Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I > >> have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building > >> HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now. > >> > >> I suggest that the original

RE: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

>> >> Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I >> have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building >> HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now. >> >> I suggest that the original poster double-check that he has RELENG_5_1 >> and not HEAD. And I do have bui

Re: can't boot from 4.8-RELEASE distribution CD (and 5.1-BETA2)

I found the problem; it only occurs if I try to boot with my Palm cradle attached to COM1. Remove it, and everything works fine. On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:20:27PM -0400, Guy Middleton wrote: > I'm posting a follup to -current, since I get a similar but different problem > with the 5.1-BETA2 CD.

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:03, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Richards wr > ites: > >On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > >> I thought the point in KOBJ was that it was extensible so you could > >> KLD load stuff which added more methods ? > > >

Re: fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:17, Tobias Roth wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:59:22PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote: > > > > > > fxp0: device timeout > > > > > > > I get these as well. Is it on irq9 by any chance, along with acpi0 ? > > No. It's o

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Richards wr ites: >On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> I thought the point in KOBJ was that it was extensible so you could >> KLD load stuff which added more methods ? > >Not exactly. It allows for dynamic binding of methods that implement

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're > : defined in the .m files. > > No it isn't. One can add additional interfaces at any

Re: s4bios

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:32:05PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > Is there anyone that has succesfully used "acpiconf -s 4"? > > I'm very interested in your reports. If you haven't tried yet, but are > willing to help me, please report me your findings. Hello Mark, I may not be totally co

Re: our compiler can't convert longlong to float? 5.1-RC1

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:40:40PM +0800, leafy wrote: > I got this strange message and a core dump after installing > 5.1-RC1 cdrom iso > > checking if c++ supports bool types... yes > checking if conversion of longlong to float works... Segmentation fault > (core du > mped) > no > configure: er

Re: fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:59:22PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote: > > > > fxp0: device timeout > > > > I get these as well. Is it on irq9 by any chance, along with acpi0 ? No. It's on irc 11 device 8 (as dmesg states). All irqs in bios are set to 1

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're : defined in the .m files. No it isn't. One can add additional interfaces at any time without breaking binary compatibility, so you don't know,

Re: whats an UDMA ICRC error ?

In the last episode (Jun 03), Andreas Klemm said: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:23:35AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Jun 03), Andreas Klemm said: > > > ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206 retrying > > > ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of

Re: fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:00, Tobias Roth wrote: > Hi > > I still get a > > fxp0: device timeout > I get these as well. Is it on irq9 by any chance, along with acpi0 ? -- Tis a wise thing to know what is wanted, wiser still to know when it has been achieved and wisest of all to know when it i

Re: whats an UDMA ICRC error ?

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am Dienstag, 03.06.03, um 07:57 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Andreas > Klemm: > > >ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206 > >retrying > >ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206 > >

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: > > > >On 02-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote: > >> On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a > >>>

Re: whats an UDMA ICRC error ?

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:23:35AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jun 03), Andreas Klemm said: > > Hi, > > > > my console today shows the following error message from my disk: > > > > ad2: UDMA ICRC error cmd=read fsbn 74689079 of 74689079-74689206 retrying > > ad2: UDMA ICRC err

Re: raidframe

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is an IDE > RAID controller, it uses the "SCSI" asr driver. My controller has > worked very well with FreeBSD 5.x, and the server is currently running > 5.1-BETA. The only thing that does

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: > >On 02-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote: >> On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: >> >>> >>> The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a >>> heavy penalty for growing the array if an extra method didn't fit, bu

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On 02-Jun-2003 Paul Richards wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > >> >> The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a >> heavy penalty for growing the array if an extra method didn't fit, but >> that would be exceptionally rare and with our present u

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote: > It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point > that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that > was build in a totally clean environment? > > Scott If you mean a kernel build with standard optimizations, ye

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Doug, am I missing something? I think we can have more than 256 methods, en toto, since any object can implement multiple interface types and we don't know, a-priori, how many different interfaces a given objec

libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it doesn't work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong? # cat /etc/libmap.conf libc_r.so.5 libthr.so.1 libc_r.so libthr.so [/usr/X11R6/bin/ggv] libc_r.so.5

fxp0: device timeout with 5.1BETA2

Hi I still get a fxp0: device timeout on my Thinkpad T30 with a newly installed 5.1BETA2. Browsing the archives showed that people had success with hint.fxp.0.prefer_iomap="1" on a T30 and 5.1BETA1. Any ideas why this doesn't help in my case? thx, t.

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 21:04, Paul Richards wrote: > > The tradeoff with using an index into an array is that there'd be a > heavy penalty for growing the array if an extra method didn't fit, but > that would be exceptionally rare and with our present usage we'd never > have that happen. I'm not

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

Bryan Liesner wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote: Actually, I think it's cam in general that's causing the panic with these changes. Please see kern/52718 I didn't see a backtrace in the PR. Is there one that you can share with us? It panics during boot and, unfortunately, no dump is

Re: HD Speed Benchmark

On 2003.06.03 22:20:56 +0200, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote: > > I have made some Benchmark on my inspiron 8500 (Intel 82801DB (ICH4) - > UDMA100) > and i am geting very Bad results on the 5.1, i have got beter results on 5.0 Beta2 still had all the debugging options in the kernel, so unless you

HD Speed Benchmark

I have made some Benchmark on my inspiron 8500 (Intel 82801DB (ICH4) - UDMA100) and i am geting very Bad results on the 5.1, i have got beter results on 5.0 dmesg -- 5.0R --> http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.0R 5.1B2 --> http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.1B2 Check out the output

Re: vmstat -s broken

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Pete Fritchman wrote: > ++ 03/06/03 20:47 +0200 - Pawel Worach: > | I don't know for how long this has been broken but vmstat > | always reports 0 (zero) for the number of system calls > | executed which is virtually impossible. > | > | This is on a system built > | FreeBSD dar

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:56:01 -0700 "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, I didn't have any trouble building RELENG_5_1 on RELENG_4, but I > have been getting the same failure originally quoted when building > HEAD on RELENG_4 for several days now. > > I suggest that the original po

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 18:19, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I'm not sure that kobj actually needs to be MP safe if the kobj > : struct is always embedded in a structure at a higher level i.e. > : a use of kobj in s

Re: s4bios

I put my test results in: http://anarcat.ath.cx/acpi-test/ I have done other tests using a build made after the recent ACPI import and bugfixes, and I will update the info there when completely done. A. On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 05:32:05PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > Is there anyone that has su

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:51:59 +0300 > Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make > > buildworld compiles > > a while and then stops with: > > > > Question

s4bios

Is there anyone that has succesfully used "acpiconf -s 4"? I'm very interested in your reports. If you haven't tried yet, but are willing to help me, please report me your findings. Thanks Mark -- Mark SantcroosRIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/

Re: vmstat -s broken

++ 03/06/03 20:47 +0200 - Pawel Worach: | I don't know for how long this has been broken but vmstat | always reports 0 (zero) for the number of system calls | executed which is virtually impossible. | | This is on a system built | FreeBSD darkstar 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Tue Jun 3 02:

vmstat -s broken

I don't know for how long this has been broken but vmstat always reports 0 (zero) for the number of system calls executed which is virtually impossible. This is on a system built FreeBSD darkstar 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Tue Jun 3 02:48:51 CEST 2003 darkstar# vmstat -s | grep "system

Re: Native JDK with libthr/libkse

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2003/06/01 23:53), Narvi wrote: > > > > The absence of credible Java support in FreeBSD has lost us significant > > > penetration in the past, and it would be disastrous if the perceptions > > > of the past shaped the future. > > > > credible rather

Re: viapropm doesnt like sys/dev/pci.c rev 1.214

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:54:36AM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > On 02-Jun-2003 Nicolas Souchu wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:52:57AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > >> > >> viapropm is seriously broken for other reasons and needs professional > >> help. > > > > What kind of break

RE: SU not working on fresh CVSUP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:09 AM Fernando Gleiser wrote: > Did you run mergemaster(8) after buildworld/installworld ? I did but, I must have skipped the pam file. My fault. Thanks for the help. - -

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote: > > Actually, I think it's cam in general that's causing the panic with > > these changes. > > > > Please see kern/52718 > > I didn't see a backtrace in the PR. Is there one that you can share > with us? > It panics during boot and, unfortunately, no dump is

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm not sure that kobj actually needs to be MP safe if the kobj : struct is always embedded in a structure at a higher level i.e. : a use of kobj in say the device driver code will not interact with : it's use b

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

Bryan Liesner wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: If you have had issues with libthr on SMP or umtx panics, the following patch may solve these issues. http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/umtxlocks.diff This patch fixes several race conditions and other issues with umtx. Actually,

Re: umtx/libthr SMP fixes.

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > If you have had issues with libthr on SMP or umtx panics, the following > patch may solve these issues. > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/umtxlocks.diff > > This patch fixes several race conditions and other issues with umtx. Actually, no it does

Re: RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:51:59 +0300 Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make > buildworld compiles > a while and then stops with: > > Question is if this is supported and if yes, what should I do > differently? > > Pete Got

RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1

I'm trying to upgrade RELENG_4 to RELENG_5_1 using source and make buildworld compiles a while and then stops with: Question is if this is supported and if yes, what should I do differently? Pete cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DPTHREAD_KERNEL -I/usr/src/lib/libpthread/../libc/includ

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:56:59AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : You should look at kobj, it's precisely this sort of dynamic > : dispatching that it was designed to support. > > Too bad it is a little slo

our compiler can't convert longlong to float? 5.1-RC1

I got this strange message and a core dump after installing 5.1-RC1 cdrom iso checking if c++ supports bool types... yes checking if conversion of longlong to float works... Segmentation fault (core du mped) no configure: error: Your compiler cannot convert a longlong value to a float! If you are

Re: 5.1-beta2 failed upgrade install

> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 23:52:38 +0900 (JST) > From: Masachika ISHIZUKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon > or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from > 5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-R

Re: 5.1-beta2 failed upgrade install

>> Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon >> or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from >> 5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-RC1 with Xeon or Pentium4 without panics. > > Here, here. I was doing installworld and got a double fault. After > reboot

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : You should look at kobj, it's precisely this sort of dynamic : dispatching that it was designed to support. Too bad it is a little slow and not MP safe in its implementation. Warner ___

Re: 5.1-beta2 failed upgrade install

On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 23:52:38 +0900 (JST) Masachika ISHIZUKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon > or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from > 5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-RC1 with Xeon or Pentium4 without pan

Re: 5.1-beta2 failed upgrade install

Are there anybody who can upgrade to 5.1-RC1 successfully with Xeon or Pentium4 ? I can newly install 5.1-RC1, but I can not upgrade from 5.1-BETA or 5.1-RC1 to 5.1-RC1 with Xeon or Pentium4 without panics. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]