On 26/03/2011, at 15:02, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/ker
Has anyone done one recently?
I note there aren't any snapshots for this month, so perhaps I'm not alone.
I tried this :-
RELNAME=9.0
BUILDNAME=${RELNAME}-GENESIS
make release CHROOTDIR=/tmp/${RELNAME}-release BUILDNAME=$BUILDNAME
HTTP_PROXY=http://proxy:3128 FTP_PROXY=http://proxy:3128 EXTSRCDI
--Artem
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Nerius Landys wrote:
>> Use devel/subversion-freebsd though so it expands the $FreeBSD$ RCS tag.
>
> I just did that. I am afraid however that all of my files in /etc
> will have a different RCS tag. For example, I got /usr/src/ via SVN
> directly (hea
> Use devel/subversion-freebsd though so it expands the $FreeBSD$ RCS tag.
I just did that. I am afraid however that all of my files in /etc
will have a different RCS tag. For example, I got /usr/src/ via SVN
directly (head, or CURRENT) and did a mergemaster prebuildworld step,
and I get this di
> Use devel/subversion-freebsd though so it expands the $FreeBSD$ RCS tag.
I was just gonna say. Doing the plain old SVN checkout of head and
mergemaster preworld, I noticed that:
*** Displaying differences between ./etc/group and installed version:
--- /etc/group 2011-03-22 16:45:05.00
On Mar 25, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:25:18 -0700
> Nerius Landys wrote:
>
>> So for example:
>>
>>> cd /usr/
>>> rm -rf src/
>>> svn checkout svn://some.repos.freebsd.org/src-all/path/to/ ./src
>
> The hostname is svn.freebsd.org, and the branches are under '
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:25:18 -0700
Nerius Landys wrote:
> So for example:
>
> > cd /usr/
> > rm -rf src/
> > svn checkout svn://some.repos.freebsd.org/src-all/path/to/ ./src
The hostname is svn.freebsd.org, and the branches are under 'base' -
i.e. base/head, base/stable/8 etc.
svn checko
I plan on doing some kernel tweaking on CURRENT. If my changes go
well I'll submit my changes to one of the devs.
I'm used to getting /usr/src/ via supfile using the "csup" command. I
find that it would be a whole lot easier for me to access some sort of
anonymous SVN or CVS directly to populate
On 03/25/2011 03:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a
rewrite of pkg_install.
pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
How does it relate
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:47:13 -0700 Garrett Cooper
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> >> > >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep
>
2011/3/25 Yuri :
> On 03/25/2011 03:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
>> contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a
>> rewrite of pkg_install.
>>
>> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
> wrote:
>
>> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
>> > >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep
>> > >>> the /var/db/pkg//xxx files even with pkgng and only
>> > >>> use
As far as package managers go, yum, which is used widely, uses SQLite.
--
Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can only be attained through
understanding.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
wrote:
> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep
> > >>> the /var/db/pkg//xxx files even with pkgng and only
> > >>> use the DB as a way to speed up some work (so
> > >>> the DB corruption j
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:54:35AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 25/03/2011 17:35 Pietro Cerutti said the following:
> >> No need to look for strange scenarios, I'm surely going to sudo rm -f the
> >> file
> >> more sooner than later, so.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:18:24PM +, Julien Laffaye thus spake:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
if you are going to test on current please notice that make install
will overwrite /usr/lib/libpkg so pkg_* tools won't
2011/3/25 Jason Helfman :
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:18:24PM +, Julien Laffaye thus spake:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
if you are going to test on current please notice that make install
Alex Dupre writes:
| Alexander Motin ha scritto:
| > You can choose. Their functionality is comparable, but with graid:
| ...
|
| Yes, as I supposed, so the answer is 'yes'. Obviously it needs a lot of
| testing. Thanks for your work.
Yes, it can use more testing which is why we (Cisco) wanted i
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/03/2011 17:35 Pietro Cerutti said the following:
>> No need to look for strange scenarios, I'm surely going to sudo rm -f the
>> file
>> more sooner than later, so... maybe just save a copy?
>
> I even can rm -rf / by accident.
> What'
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> if you are going to test on current please notice that make install
>> will overwrite /usr/lib/libpkg so pkg_* tools won't work anymore.
>>
>> We will workaround that later by renaming o
on 25/03/2011 17:35 Pietro Cerutti said the following:
> No need to look for strange scenarios, I'm surely going to sudo rm -f the file
> more sooner than later, so... maybe just save a copy?
I even can rm -rf / by accident.
What's your solution to this? :)
P.S. one solution would be a subcase of
On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> if you are going to test on current please notice that make install
> will overwrite /usr/lib/libpkg so pkg_* tools won't work anymore.
>
> We will workaround that later by renaming our lib libpkgng for the test phase.
>
> But I won't be able
2011/3/25 Julien Laffaye :
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> On 25/03/2011 11:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>>> In term of technology we decided to use a sqlite3 database, and to
>>> prevent potential trolling, sqlite3 is used in it's amalgamation form
>>> which means
2011/3/25 Pietro Cerutti :
> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
>> >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep the /var/db/pkg//xxx
>> >>> files even with pkgng and only use the DB as a way to speed up some work
>> >>> (so
>> >>> the DB corruption just requires to run pkg2ng), or are y
On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep the /var/db/pkg//xxx
> >>> files even with pkgng and only use the DB as a way to speed up some work
> >>> (so
> >>> the DB corruption just requires to run pkg2ng), or are you lost of the DB
> >>> is
> >>>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
> 15:14:52 +0100):
>
>> 2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger :
>>>
>>> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
>>> 11:11:11 +0100):
>>>
pkgng is a binary package manager writte
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
15:14:52 +0100):
2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger :
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
11:11:11 +0100):
pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about s
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
11:11:11 +0100):
pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about some parts you explained.
features supported are or will be :
- the register command can analyse el
2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger :
> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
> 11:11:11 +0100):
>
>> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
>
> I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about some parts you
> explained.
>
>> features supported are or will be
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 25/03/2011 11:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> In term of technology we decided to use a sqlite3 database, and to
>> prevent potential trolling, sqlite3 is used in it's amalgamation form
>> which means it is incorporated in the code sou
Hello.
I'm just implementing the following network scheme on our freebsd hosts:
1) physical interface
2) for each vlanN on physical interface I create bridgeN and connect
interface to the bridge
3) for each vnet jail which need access to vlanN I create epair and
connect it to bridgeN
4) for real
Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Alexander Motin w dniu 2011-03-24, o godz. 22:48:
>> I've just committed the new GEOM-based software RAID driver (graid) into
>> the HEAD [1]. Brave testers are welcome. :)
>
> Great work :-) Two questions:
>
> 1. Any plans to add support
On 25/03/2011 11:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
In term of technology we decided to use a sqlite3 database, and to
prevent potential trolling, sqlite3 is used in it's amalgamation form
which means it is incorporated in the code sources (as recommanded by
sqlite developpers like a statical
> So, please, someone, somewhere, share a success story, where you're
> using FreeBSD, ZFS, and HAST. Let me know that it does work. I'm
> starting to lose faith in my abilities here. :(
I ran our main database for the old company using ZFS on top of HAST
without any problems at all. Had a sing
Hi all,
miwi@ launched the new thing called Experimental Call For Testing,
it's our turn :)
Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a
rewrite of pkg_install.
pkgng is a binary package manager written from
Alexander Motin ha scritto:
You can choose. Their functionality is comparable, but with graid:
...
Yes, as I supposed, so the answer is 'yes'. Obviously it needs a lot of
testing. Thanks for your work.
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Alexander Motin ha scritto:
I've just committed the new GEOM-based software RAID driver (graid) into
the HEAD [1]. Brave testers are welcome. :)
Supposing they are equally stable, is it now better to use graid instead
of gmirror (et similar)?
--
Alex Dupre
___
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Alexander Motin ha scritto:
>> I've just committed the new GEOM-based software RAID driver (graid) into
>> the HEAD [1]. Brave testers are welcome. :)
>
> Supposing they are equally stable, is it now better to use graid instead
> of gmirror (et similar)?
You can choose. Their
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:36:32PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> I've tried with FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE, 8-STABLE, 8-STABLE w/ZFSv28
> patches, and 9-CURRENT (after the ZFSv28 commit). Things work well
> until I start hastd. Then either the system locks up, or hastd causes
> a kernel panic, or hastd
39 matches
Mail list logo
