* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000816 14:52] wrote:
>
> Please test and review this patch:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch
Not tested, but looks good, I'd like to see it applied.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000815 10:39] wrote:
> Apparently, the threads library still hasn't been fixed?
>
> Follow the link for the patch.
I'm testing the change now and I'll commit it soon.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS fil
* David Greenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000807 23:15] wrote:
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Greenman
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Obviously the waker-upper knows that the condition is true. Otherwise
> >the existing code which doesn't check wouldn't work. In the expensive
> >cases
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000807 10:03] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon writes:
> >:> * Stephen McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000805 08:49] wrote:
> >:> >
> >:> > Patch 2 is smaller and possibly controversial. Normally bufdaemon and
> >:> > syncer are sleeping wh
* Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000807 01:25] wrote:
> > * Stephen McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000805 08:49] wrote:
> > >
> > > Patch 2 is smaller and possibly controversial. Normally bufdaemon and
> > > syncer are sleeping when they are told to suspend. This delays shutdown
> > > by a few bor
* Stephen McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000805 08:49] wrote:
>
> Patch 2 is smaller and possibly controversial. Normally bufdaemon and
> syncer are sleeping when they are told to suspend. This delays shutdown
> by a few boring seconds. With this patch, it is zippier. I expect people
> to complai
* j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000802 06:38] wrote:
>
> A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
There's rumors of some "problem" chipsets, but afaik 66 has been working
for quite som
* Piotr Wo?niak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000801 08:21] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have to run programs in Clipper/DOS under FreeBSD.
> Does exist a good DOS-emulator or other solving of this problem?
> (for example compiling source code in Clipper under FreeBSD..)
Maybe 'doscmd'? Let us know. :)
-Alfred
To
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000719 18:32] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > I needed to add 'cp' to src/Makefile.inc1, Marcel explained it to me
>
> Oh, so it was "cp" that wasn't found, I take it. We should change
>
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000719 17:45] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ===> libexec/rtld-elf
> > chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> > chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.
old
boggles!
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000715 07:29] wrote:
> The build broke this morning, and is still broken as of a few moments
> ago. The problem is that systat tries to use the (apparently now
> missing) m_mtypes element of the mbstat structure:
>
> su-2.04# pwd
> /usr/src/usr.bin/systat
> su-2.
Ok guys it's a _very_ rough HOWTO, but patches (not comments!) would be
appreciated:
How to install FreeBSD via Intel's netboot (PXE)
http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/pxe/
enjoy.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child;
d the
> code against the original test suit for Spencer's library.
>
> I'd like, thus, to merge the changes. If anyone have objections, please
> raise them now. :-)
None other than waiting at least 2 weeks, or for 4.1 to come out.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTE
* Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000707 16:18] wrote:
>
> Michael C. Wu wrote:
> > Will you consider looking at :
> >
> > http://dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de/~olli/propellers/
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=15436
> >
> > It is an additional functionality and sho
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000705 00:04] wrote:
> I've tried to update the document to reflect the comments I've
> received so far:
>
> Current directory structure:
>
> sys/
> ${MACHINE}/ - MD stuff
> conf/ - MD kernel config files
[gag, snip]
> Here is m
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000627 12:36] wrote:
> So I cvsupped yesterday, and tehn made a new kernel.
> so suddenly ssh doesn't work any more.
cvsup again and recompile and reload the randomdev module, it should
resume working.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
eeds protection
at splhigh.
If there were 'diskbufs' and they had thier own private map then you'd
only really need splbio wrapped around the call.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To
xmms is a really good test for libc_r and the sound system.
xmms no longer plays back mp3s, other mp3 players are working
fine.
Any ideas?
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Kazutaka YOKOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000614 17:00] wrote:
>
> >After taking the patches for config and booting my box reboots
>
> Which patch is it?
I'm sorry, I should have been more clear, no patches, just the 5.0
sources from ~noon PST.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
After taking the patches for config and booting my box reboots
because I have:
#allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50"
#saver="logo"
#font8x8="cp437-8x8"
#font8x14="cp437-8x14"
#font8x16="cp437-8x16"
enabled in my rc.conf, a kernel from ~2 days ago is fine with this.
thanks,
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: s
. This does not necessarily tell anything about
> > the world breakage, of course...
>
> Yes, I know, but it had nothing to do with this particular breakage.
afaik -O -pipe is supported, the breakage in libdisk is due to an
oversight using vi most likely, I've fixed it, we'll
cluster. If it became popular enough several of
the cvsup mirrors could adopt it.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
causes that comes with overuse of macros causes problems
with the I cache where inlining really doesn't pay off. Most archs
nowadays have pretty good support for leaf functions or have cheap
calls instructions.
Just food for thought.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTE
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000415 11:32] wrote:
>
> :On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> :
> :> Hi,
> :> when using a linux java app (SAP PlatinGUI 46Cb2) I get the above panic.
> :> FreeBSD -current. Kernel+mods in sync.
> :> Linux from ports. Linux-Java-JDK 1.2.2 from
ecific set of steps for Alan to reproduce
> it?
Yes, find all places where source->ref_count is incremented and check
for OBJ_ONEMAPPING as well as where OBJ_ONEMAPPING is set.
Then add some printfs to find the snippet that's incrementing it
to complain when the OBJ_ONEMAPPING bit is set, an
.
>
> I remember some while ago some threads going wild on the subject of MTA. The
> only reason why I am posting this is that I did the work for some other
> project I am involved in, and if it can help others, then I'd rather share
> it.
I'd rather not see it in the base d
e to work with Greg soon to resolve this, if it hasn't already
been fixed.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000403 18:07] wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 April 2000 at 17:23:49 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000402 17:04] wrote:
> >>
> >> :I did look at the code, struct proc is allocated from
bout it if it were not made absolutely clear
> and possibly enforced somehow to never do this in kernel land.
When in doubt, ask. Design and Implementation clearly explains the
kernel stack program as well as some other OS texts afaik.
Just because it's legal C doesn't mean it's all
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000402 17:04] wrote:
>
> :I did look at the code, struct proc is allocated from a zone,
> :meaning it won't "go away" once allocated, there's no danger in
> :dereferencing p_pptr, I don't get it.
> :
> :--
#x27;s safe to dereference
> :the ppid pointer once the entire struct proc is populated, which needs
> :to happen before the process can even call getpid().
> :
> :phk seems to agree.
> :
> :--
> :-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> :"I have the heart
c allows for stable storage meaning it's safe to dereference
the ppid pointer once the entire struct proc is populated, which needs
to happen before the process can even call getpid().
phk seems to agree.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a chi
* Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000402 13:05] wrote:
> It seems Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > > Just to clearify the things...
> > > > Are these problems with 4.0-RELEASE with 4.0-STABLE or with 5.0-CURRENT?
> > >
> > > I have the prob
2s
just FYI.
Have any of you guys running vinum had any problems with phk's recent
patches with bio? Just wanted to know if I should take the plunge.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
dwired to 128 in slcompress. Any
> comments ?
>
Why not just malloc the structure instread of using a stack variable?
Various other parts of the kernel do so to get around this problem,
since we're heading up SMP now it _not_ the time to start using
global variables.
--
-Alfred P
P).
What I'm calling for is a vote if we'll rely on this type of behavior
(32 bit stores being atomic with respect to readers) or not, or
perhaps to rely on it but mark it somehow so people can "fix it"
if the need arises later by using other locking primatives on what
should be
* Allen Pulsifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000329 21:05] wrote:
> Here's another alternative for reading structures like time
> that always change monotonically: read the values in
> "MSB" to "LSB" order, then go back and check in reverse
> order that nothing has changed. For example, to read a
> stru
and pack a private structure, then copy it to a stack and expand
it into the user's address space.
What do you guys think about that? Am I totally missing something
that makes the Linux way right/ok? (no locking on a 64bit struct)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
line for sys/i386/i386/mplock.s ?
Mine is:
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/mplock.s,v 1.30 2000/03/28 07:16:15 dillon Exp $
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
pts.
There's also this to consider:
proc0: splaaa(); splbbb();
proc1: splbbb(); splaaa();
deadlock. Which needs to be worked out somehow.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000326 01:51] wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 01:15:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > I recently (tonight) I cvsup'd to 5.0 to play with Matt's SMP stuff
> > and came across a problem where it seems that 5.0 do
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000326 01:18] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> >I'm about to wander down vinum's source again.
> >
> >With a kernel and vinum module dated approx Tue Feb 29 06:53:56
> >
ike thousands of buffers
but yet my vinum drive is "marked clean" on boot without the need
for fsck.
Anyhow, I just wanted to let you guys know what's going on hopefully
you'll have a solution faster than I will.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTE
le to measure
the getuid() loop with and without this (MPLOCKED incl _cnt+V_SYSCALL),
especially with 2 processes doing a getuid() loop?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000324 10:23] wrote:
> A preliminary BGL patch is now on my site, relative to RELENG_4.
>
> http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
>
> It is the smp-patch-03.diff item at the end of the first section.
>
> My test box successfully built the wor
amrvar.h
> *** amrvar.h 1999/10/26 23:18:57 1.2
> --- amrvar.h 2000/03/23 19:20:04
> ***
> *** 37,43
> #define AMR_CFG_SIG 0xa0
> #define AMR_SIGNATURE 0x3344
>
> ! #define AMR_MAXCMD 255 /* ident = 0 not allowed */
> #d
le additional allocation for the b_pages if that gets implemented
buffer lockdown (which although addressed above, is still something to avoid)
other stuff to make sure the rest of the kernel only sees the pbuf.
If anything perhaps a zone for b_pages to allow for easy use of GET/PUT_PAGES
t
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000320 12:03] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> >* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000320 11:45] wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> &g
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000320 11:45] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
>
> >Keeping the currect cluster code is a bad idea, if the drivers were
> >taught how to traverse the linked list in the buf struct rather
>
f page
twiddling and also allow for massive IO clustering ( > 64k ) because
we won't be limited by the size of the b_pages[] array for our
upper bound on the amount of buffers we can issue effectively a
scatter/gather on (since the drivers must VTOPHYS them anyway).
To realize my &q
pair,
> these 3.5" things s*ck.
Another fun one is dd'ing the 2.88MB images to a 1.44 diskette and
being too tired to figure out what the #@$@#$@@# is going wrong while
shivering your butt off in the colo facility.
blech! :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTE
* Marc van Kempen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000319 07:18] wrote:
>
> > Marc van Kempen wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > While trying to boot from the 4.0 installation disks,
> > > I get the following error after the devices have been probed:
> > >
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> > > root@localhost:/us
es to let's
say /modules3.x and install your new modules by just typing 'make install'
in /usr/src/sys/modules/
Read the loader page carefully and you should be able to boot 3.x
kernels with 3.x modules and 4.0 modules with a 4.0 kernel without
too much voodoo.
good luck,
--
-Alf
cntls and ioctls aren't being propogated enough to set
the flags properly, but if they are then it should work sort of the
way SIGIO does, basically generating a signal for /some condition/
on a descriptor.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PR
* Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000317 08:48] wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > Another issue here, at least in our application of it, is about adding
> > users and setting passwords.With well over 100 machines, we want to
> > also have installed user
d.
I feel pretty confident assuming that most people that burn ISOs probably
keep enough disk space free to hold one and not much more, going from
a requirement of ~650MB to ~1.2GB wouldn't be a smart move imo.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe
* Idea Receiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000307 21:33] wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I was tring to make release (just for interests) yesterday. Which
> I receive an error "ln: /R/stage/kernels/GENERIC: No such file or
> directory" in release.3. I go back to check Makefile, I see "_R"
> been defined as "/R". W
* Christopher Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000307 12:50] wrote:
> >>>>> "Alfred" == Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Alfred> When was the last time you've cvsup'd and built world
> Alfred> before it brok
* Christopher Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000307 12:09] wrote:
> After much perusing of source code, scouring of cvs log messages, and
> searching the archives, I've determined I have no idea where else to
> look for this problem I'm having.
>
> The problem is this:
>
> After booting, starting
* Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000306 12:08] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been bitten by the following:
>
> 44 relativity ~ % chown -v djb:wheel test
> chown: illegal option -- v
> usage: chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v] owner[:group] file ...
>chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-
* Dan Papasian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000303 04:39] wrote:
> Can you please give an example of where multiple arguments
> doesn't work as expected?
>
> It works fine over here.
~ % which ls ln sh
/bin/ls
/bin/ln
/bin/sh
~ % ./a.out ls ln sh
/bin/sh
--
-Alfred Perlst
* Dan Papasian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000302 18:17] wrote:
> While this may sound crazy, I was tired of 'which' taking a long
> time to complete on my 486 dx4/100 when it was under extereme
> pressure, so I rewrote it in C :)
>
...snip
> NOTE:
> This version of which has exactly the same be
* Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000301 09:24] wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> >I used to have a shell script to do this, but i don't know where it
> >went.
> >
> >--
> >-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL
claim the
> shared memory in 1 swoop. Then we'd be able to shut down XFree86 (and
> obviously any other apps using shared memory), and get on with life :)
>
> (anyone listening?)
er, yes this is entirely possible.
If you want to clear SHM then use 'ipcs' to list and &
/Makefile: No such file or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop in /home/src/share/examples.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/src/share.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/src.
--
-Alfred Perlstein
* Cliff Rowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000229 01:59] wrote:
> Just an update on this shared memory error. After running XFree86 for a
> couple of hours, running various programs (I've not seen a pattern yet):
>
> [dozprompt@guru]# xchat
> Gdk-ERROR **: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource
It seems that sysinstall will completely refuse to install unless we
have made a swap partition. Then for some reason it didn't allow
us the option of partitioning our second disk after "committing".
Why force swap? I swear we were going to configure it after the
install.
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000227 19:53] wrote:
>
> I've posted about this previously, and am still hoping for a useful answer
> :-). I have a box with an ISA 3Com 3C509 Etherlink III card in it, but
> the ie0 and fe0 probes now come before the ep0 probe in the boot sequence.
> If thos
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000225 22:06] wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Can anyone working on the recent sshd black magic linkage stuff please
> > step up and explain?
> >
> > Or shall i move it to network_pass4?
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Chris Timmons wrote:
>
> > I find that if I start /usr/sbin/sshd manually everything works as
> > expected. When I allow it to start via the rc scripts, I get upon
> > connecting from my 1.2.27 ssh client
> >
> > sshd[190]: fatal: rsa_private_decrypt() failed
Chris a
* Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000225 16:47] wrote:
> I know that openssl and openssh were under heavy construction
> (yesterday?), but since the commits have stopped (for now), I was
> wondering is anyone else is able to build it. Going to
> /usr/src/secure and running make produces a problem
* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000224 13:45] wrote:
> I'm guessing this is related to jkh's mention of OpenSSH coming into
> the tree, but I'm posting it anyway. Just in case it helps. my cvsup is
> less then 4 hours old.
>
> ===> libssl
> rm -f .depend
> mkdep -f .depend -a-DTERMIOS
Er, shouldn't you guys let Kirk know, not only is he "MAINTAINER", but
pretty much mostly "CREATOR" :)
Kirk, another issue with running out of space in FFS seems to have
come up:
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000223 18:57] wrote:
> :Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :I think I've fo
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000223 09:55] wrote:
>
> :> : David.
> :>
> :> With softupdates turned on? Softupdates has known problems when a
> :> disk runs out of space.
> :
> :didn't kirk just fix that?
> :
> : __--_|\ Julian Elischer
>
> I don't recall it be
sion
so that we may fix it so as to help other users?
-Alfred
>
> On 23-Feb-00 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000222 21:19] wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> I have been following the disscussions here for a while, just tryin
* William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000222 21:19] wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have been following the disscussions here for a while, just trying to get a
> feel of what the transition from 3.4-stable 4.0-release will be like. I am
> running -current on my alpha, but that was a fresh install. I am debati
* Alex Le Heux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000221 11:25] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am I the only one who's experiencing an amzing amount of crashes on
> Netscape?
>
> It's been going on for quite some time now (months), upgrading Netscape or
> switching from the Linux to the FreeBSD to the BSDI version doesn't
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000219 02:22] wrote:
> I remeber being a newbie and getting burned by the need to explicitly
> turn a line 'off' in my /etc/ttys file instead of simply deleting it.
>
> This fixes it using a trivial mark then collect sweep.
>
I remeber being a newbie and getting burned by the need to explicitly
turn a line 'off' in my /etc/ttys file instead of simply deleting it.
This fixes it using a trivial mark then collect sweep.
Can a couple people take a look? I'd like to get it into 4.0 because
it seems to follow POLA better.
* Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000218 13:27] wrote:
> > < said:
> >
> > > Why is this being discussed as if it is new?
> >
> > > This is what my tool _does_, for crying out loud!!
> >
> > Which so far nobody else has ever seen.
>
> Nor asked to see.
>
> Poul-Henning Kamp's "bike shed" arg
* Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000217 17:55] wrote:
> < said:
>
> > o I want to completely dekerberise userland, and only have kerberos
> > via PAMs. A ton of work, and I have just started with this.
>
> Huh? PAM is Pluggable Authentication Modules, not Pluggable Protocol
> Modules...
* Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000217 12:45] wrote:
> At 10:35 AM -0800 2000/2/17, Parag Patel wrote:
>
> > Hello. I have a friend's quad PPro box temporarily sitting in my garage
> > that I've been using to play with 4.0-CURRENT and vinum. Since the last
> > series of bug-fixes a few w
* Andrew Maltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000216 22:00] wrote:
> Hi, guys!
>
> Any comments? I had to downgrade back to 3.4 yesterday.. which works
> absolutely without problems. If you're going to say ``it's hardware
> problem'' -- this was my first thought too. I tried to change memory and
> it did
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000216 19:14] wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 February 2000 at 17:52:42 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Joao Pedras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000216 17:50] wrote:
> >> Hello all
> >>
> >> While making -j 4 buildworld
* Joao Pedras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000216 17:50] wrote:
> Hello all
>
> While making -j 4 buildworld and moving a netscape window, everything frozen.
> Happens often if do other things while cpu and disk are very active.
>
> Happens quite often.
>
> Anyone else has noticed this ?
Do you mean d
* Joao Pedras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000216 18:07] wrote:
> eheh
>
> I mean dead frozen, like if I was watching at a screeshot of a X session ]:)
>
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > Do you mean dead frozen, as in needs a reboot? or frozen for a second or
> &g
p both our current threads model and the linux threads model a lot.
> I can do it in a day and it should be trivial to test, the modifications
> are actually quite minor.
I'd love to see it happen for 4.0. Toss some diffs
up and we'll see if Jordan gives it an ok.
--
-Alf
---+-
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
f VFS functionality, that
although somewhat trivial, it would break third party filesystem
KLDs and the work would touch every single filesystem. You can
avoid it by hacking at the netexport stuff, but it gets kinda ugly
afaik.
It is a shame that no one who's begged for locks has come forward,
I have no good test env for stressing the code, and I'd be nice to
get some preliminary feedback on its stability.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* David E. Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000211 16:50] wrote:
> I realize that we are all very busy and the coming 4.0-RELEASE has also
> compounded things, but I have heard nothing back on the rpc.lockd that
> was released just a short time ago. I take it no news is good news and
> we can start the
* Kai Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000209 13:26] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm just doing a cvsup update of my system and -as many times before- I
> realize that /usr/ports/ takes a lot of time and also disk space to sync.
>
> # du -sk /usr/ports
> 71118 /usr/ports
>
> Am I the only one being little
* David Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000201 17:41] wrote:
> I'm looking at producing a netgraph node that is going to be
> potentially very hard on kernel memory. The node may have to manage
> as many as 10K netgraph hook connections (each one requires a small
> amount of memory) and access to th
* I am not any sort of Fluffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000201 04:44]
wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 19100, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > > 2129:
> > > {set,get}flags have been added to the tree for rather dubious
> > > reasons. An unintended side effect of this is that you must
> > >
* Conrad Juleff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000201 04:13] wrote:
> After much messing around I have found the point on current where it hangs. It
> seems to hang during the PnP probe:
>
> isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices
>
> Is there anyway I can stop this probing of PnP devices? I have tried ad
* Matthew N. Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000124 18:11] wrote:
> Any reason that the IPFIREWALL and DUMMYNET code is present in
> sys/net/bridge.c? It appears that it makes a number of bad assumptions
> and in general violates the semantics of 'bridging' vs. 'routing'.
>
> Should we even encourage
* Jim Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000120 18:02] wrote:
> In you fix below, shouldn't the second block of NTOHx actually be HTONx. I
> realize that this works because the functions are the same, but it should be
> coded correctly.
>
> Jim Bloom
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> + NTOHL(th->th_seq);
>
you can find it at:
http://www.freebsd.org/~alfred/tcp_fix.diff
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
c/gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/makeinfo/../libtxi/libtxi.a
/usr/obj/home/src/i386/usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot open crt1.o: No such file or
directory
*** Error code 1
1 error
:P
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
he line open infinitely.
>
> How about a MAX_PING=3600 in make.conf or so?
>
> I've supplied patches earlier, but they've been rejected.
Please provide a reference to the PR you submitted and I'll have a look.
I don't think this modification will go in unless it's ba
501 - 600 of 714 matches
Mail list logo
