Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
>>&
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
> added to the developer summits. Plenty of the people at the most
> recent developer summit weren't @freebsd.org committers - we had
> plenty of representation from comp
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 8/1/12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> You don't want to work cooperatively.
>>>
>> Why
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
> You don't want to work cooperatively.
>
Why is it that mbuf's refactoring consultation is being held in
internal, private, committers-and-invite-only-restricted meeting at
BSDCan ?
Why is it that so much review and discussion on changes
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> [...] We lack that right now, which is why you're trying to shoe-ho
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> [...] We lack that right now, which is why you're trying to shoe-horn the FDT
> connections into a newbus world and complaining that everything sucks because
> it is a poor fit. I'd suggest that different mechanisms are necessary.
>
I'
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:06 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:03:14 am Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner L
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Luigi.
> You wrote 30 июля 2012 г., 0:47:21:
>
>>> #define fn(x) ({ fn(x, 42); })
> LR> nice trick, one always learns something on these lists...
> LR> now i wonder how it works with MSVC (windows being one of the
> LR> other
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Remapping f(a) into f(a, b) requires both a macro
> and a wrapping function, something like this
>
> T __f(T1 a, T2 b) { return f(a, b); }
> #define f(a) __f(a, b)
>
This can be done way more easily:
void fn(int a, int b)
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
> wrote:
>> Which again leaves me with the question - why does libc have it?
>>
> as for the semantic, theoretical, "why", I would refer you
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> Which again leaves me with the question - why does libc have it?
>
as for the semantic, theoretical, "why", I would refer you to the
POSIX's comity, as inet_ntop() is part of it.
- Arnaud
__
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>>
>>
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> During some ipfw/dummynet cleanup i noticed that the libkern version of
>> inet_ntoa_r() is missing the buffer size argument that is present in
>> the libc counterpart.
>>
>> Any objection if
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 28 July 2012 12:09, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> How would a single ATH_LOCK() helps here ? AFAICS, the panic seem to
>> be a classical fallout from direct dispatch where you can re-enter the
>> driver from t
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> It looks like a case of "lock held during call up the stack". This is
> bad for so many reasons.
>
> It also makes writing correctly locked drivers a pain in the ass as
> the moment you unlock the driver before calling ether_input() /
> i
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> [..]
>> Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
>> N:1 interface that you want is being done in the
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> [..]
> Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
> N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong domain. But I've been
> wrong before and look forward to seeing your replacement.
>
I will just p
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> I'm sorry you feel that way.
>
> Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
> N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong domain. But I've been
> wrong before and look forward to seeing your re
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Also, I think we should do this in general. We already have one example (e.g.
> ACPI IVARs start at 100 so that things like the ACPI PCI bus driver can
> provide both ACPI and PCI IVARs to child devices). I think we should assign
> each
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>>
>&
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
>> than one interface, and one of its child has need to use more than one
>> inte
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>&
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
>> than one interface, and one of its child has need to use more than one
>> inte
Hi folks,
Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
than one interface, and one of its child has need to use more than one
interface, each interfaces cannot register, concurrently, its own
ivar. While I try to always have a single child per
interface/resource, I need to ke
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:45 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ian Lepore
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:46 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> >>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:46 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > That's neither correct nor robust in a couple of way:
>> >
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> That's neither correct nor robust in a couple of way:
> 1) you have no guarantee a device unit will always give you the same
> resource.
this raises the following question: how can a device, today, figure
out which par
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The problem has been raised in the last BSDCan during a talk, but no
>> clear answer has been given. Some (pseudo-)devices might r
Hi folks,
The problem has been raised in the last BSDCan during a talk, but no
clear answer has been given. Some (pseudo-)devices might require
resources from multiple other (pseudo-)devices.
For example, a device is sitting on an SMBus, but need to access a
software controlled LED, sitting on a
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Boris Popov wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 6:56, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> purpose. However, if I can avoid to re-design that wheel too, by
>> getting access to scfs(4) code, I will.
>
> It is interesting, that the old drive with this code ar
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
&g
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is
Hi folks,
I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
/*
* These functions uses a presently undocumented interface to the kernel
* to walk the tree and get the type so it can print the value
Hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Steven Atreju wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> 2. apparently, bcopy is not the fastest way to copy memory.
>
> http://now.cs.berkeley.edu/Td/bcopy.html
>
"Pentium 166, Triton Chipset, EDO memory"... ahem.
- Arnaud
> Best Regards.
>
> Steven.
>
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I reproduced the previous problem on
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> [...]
>> I reproduced the previous problem on 10-CURRENT from r233917, on the
>> following platform (here running 8.2-RELEASE):
>>
>
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Il 20 aprile 2012 19:18, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I will be bringing up an old thread there, but it wo
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will be bringing up an old thread there, but it would seem the
> situation did not evolve in the past 9 years. I have a machine running
> 7.1 whose UHCI controller is generating some interrupt storm:
Hi,
I will be bringing up an old thread there, but it would seem the
situation did not evolve in the past 9 years. I have a machine running
7.1 whose UHCI controller is generating some interrupt storm:
# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq4: sio0
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [for the record...]
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
>> 9.0-RELEASE, amd64,
Hi,
[for the record...]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
> 9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
> hang, the box was running a process with about 28
Hi,
I just booted FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE on a Xeon E5-1650 based platform. It
would seems that the CPU handles by itself a lots of PCI functions
which do not seem to be supported by FreeBSD. Here is the output of
`pciconf -l' restricted to unhandled devices:
none0@pci0:0:4:0: class=0x088000 card=0x0
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 04/10/12 20:18, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>
>> On 04/10/12 19:58, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/4/9 Alexander Motin:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>
Hi,
2012/4/9 Alexander Motin :
> [...]
>
> I have strong feeling that while this test may be interesting for profiling,
> it's own results in first place depend not from how fast scheduler is, but
> from the pipes capacity and other alike things. Can somebody hint me what
> except pipe capacity an
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Il 06 aprile 2012 18:54, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> Il 05 aprile 2012 19:03, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto:
>>>> Hi folks,
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Il 05 aprile 2012 19:03, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the
>> `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking
&g
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Florian Smeets wrote:
> On 05.04.12 20:03, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the
>> `hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linu
Hi,
[Sorry for the delay, I got a bit sidetrack'ed...]
2012/2/17 Alexander Motin :
> On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>>>&g
Hi folks,
Over the past months, I ran on a couple of unused box the
`hackbench'[HACKBENCH] benchmark used by the Linux folks for tracking
down various kind of regression/improvement. `hackbench' is a
scheduler + IPC test (socket xor pipe). It creates producers/consumers
groups and let a variable q
Hi,
2012/2/28 Łukasz Wąsikowski :
> W dniu 2012-02-28 19:55, Arnaud Lacombe pisze:
>
>>> FLOWTABLE on 8.x crashed BGP routers (kern/144917).
>>>
>> no crash dump, no backtrace, no follow-up whatsoever after 1 year and
>> 2 years, what's your points ? You c
Hi,
2012/2/27 Steve Wills :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/27/12 10:53, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
>> W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
>>
>>> You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a
>>> kernel. Please do not commit a kernel config
Hi,
2012/2/27 Łukasz Wąsikowski :
> W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
>
>> You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a kernel.
>> Please do not commit a kernel config that can be booted (no LINT cannot be
>> booted) with these on without consulting appropriate
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>>
>>> I've decided to stop those cache black magic practices and focus on
>>> things that really exist in this world -- SMT and CPU load. I've
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>>>> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>> So you are saying th
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I
>>> see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on
>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with
>> checksum provided)
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote:
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter wrote:
> Hello,
> Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...]
Has 9.0 been released ?
I cannot find any announcement, especially on freebsd-announce@,
[9.0TODO] has not been updated, there is no ISO image in [0], but
there is in [3], dated from Jan 5th 2012 and `o
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to
> ensure expected behaviour.
>
Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server
install ? If not, you should not have to tune the FreeBSD i
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
>
>
> sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=20
> kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096
> sysctl: kern.ipc.somaxconn: Invalid argument
> sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=65536
> kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096
> sysctl: kern.ipc.somaxconn: Invali
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
>>> However, I'm not convinced that it is useful to do this. At some point,
>>> you are better off timing out and retrying via exponential backoff than you
>>> are queuing hundreds of thous
Hi,
[resend on the ml, my bad]
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>&
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
>
it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, i
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
>> [non-exclusively] on the following:
>>
> After finally havin
Hi *,
[I could have renamed the subject 1001 fancy ways to crash FreeBSD,
but I'll avoid :)]
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
> [non-exclusively] on the following:
>
After finally
Hi,
The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
[non-exclusively] on the following:
dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size [-Wint-t
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
>> you (committers)
>
> I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
> "you (committers)" any more... :-)
>
The re
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 9:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> [...]
>
>> However, if you want to know, my heart tends to be with BSDs.
>> Unfortunately, it's a sad love-story where your Beloved keeps
>> deceiving you d
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 5:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
>> without "action", I did implement what I suggested above.
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> [cc list trimmed]
>>
>> on 08/11/2011 22:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
>>> 2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
>>>> To
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
>>>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> [cc list trimmed]
>
> on 08/11/2011 22:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> 2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
>>> To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
>>> with
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
>> without "action", I did implement what I suggested above.
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
>> suffix to "func". Perhaps, "kbi" or "KBI". In other words, something
>> that hints at the function's
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> I'm unsure if this replies to your concerns because you just criticize
>> without making a real technical question in this post.
>>
> I made com
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> [restored cc: to the original poster]
>
> on 02/11/2011 08:10 Benjamin Kaduk said the following:
>> I am perhaps confused. Last I checked, bsd.kmod.mk caused '-include
>> opt_global.h' to be passed on the command line. Is the issue jus
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>
>>> Below is the KBI pat
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 07:22:51AM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> > Regarding the _vm_page_lock() vs. vm_page_lock_func(), the mutex.h has
>> > a lot of violations in regard
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> Below is the KBI patch after vm_page_bits_t merge is done.
> Again, I did not spent time converting all in-tree consumers
> from the (potentially) loadable modules to
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 20:15, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>>> In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if
>>> it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after.
>>
>> Given that RC1 is already out, you should probably check
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> The KDE4 in FreeBSD 9.0 RC1 amd64 is generating enormous amount of error
> messages during usage ( not visible on screen , but seen after Ctrl-Alt-F1
> discontinuation of X ) . This is making it extremely slow which may be
> cons
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
> On 10/24/11 00:38, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>>> Kernel building fails since today when kernel gets compiled via CLANG:
>>> ---
Hi,
2011/10/7 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> On 07.10.2011 23:41, Glen Barber wrote:
>> In my experience, without kern.geom.debugflags=16, the MBR will not be
>> written to the memstick, leaving you with what would effectively be a
>> coaster in the not-so-distant past.
>
> The problem is that this bad sug
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:19 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:53:11 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I've got a machine whe
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>>>>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar :
>
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon
Hi,
2011/10/18 Kostik Belousov :
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:06:27PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Oliver Pinter
>> wrote:
>> > On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On 10/18/11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrot
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I think, it's the time to enable the nxstack feature. Any comments,
>> pros, cons?
>
> I dragged the change long enough for it to miss the 9.0.
> After the
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Ah, missed something.
>
>> + getnanouptime(&ts);
>> + err = snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, "[%zd.%.6ld] ",
>> + ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec / 1000);
>
> It seems we also have a getmicrouptime(), which returns a
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi Arnaud!
>
> * Arnaud Lacombe , 20111017 22:41:
>> + buf[0] = '\0';
>> + getnanouptime(&ts);
>> + err = snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, "[%zd.%.6ld] "
s now fixed width
Arnaud Lacombe (3):
msgbuf(4): convert `msg_needsnl' to a bit flag
msgbuf(4): add logic to prepend timestamp on new line
msgbuf(4): add a sysctl to toggle timestamp prepend
sys/kern/subr_msgbuf.c | 54 ---
sys/sy
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
>>> On Fri Oct 14 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
&
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Mon Oct 17 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
>> > On Fri Oct 14 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
&
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Oct 14 11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Nali Toja wrote:
>> > Alexander Best writes:
>> >
>> >>> On Fri Oct 14 11, Poul-Henni
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
