--
Joshua Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your byte hit ratio is weak, old man
If you cache me now, I will dump more core than you can possibly imagine
Index: bin/cp/utils.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/cp/utils.c,v
retrieving
-VM motherboard, which appeared to do
unpleasant things to PCI IRQs.
Joshua
--
Joshua Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your byte hit ratio is weak, old man
If you cache me now, I will dump more core than you can possibly imagine
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:40:43PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I'd like to try out -current, however I'm not willing to clobber by working
4.7 install. How do build -current on 4.7p3 away from my RELENG_4_7
source, then install to a seperate, pre-partitioned slice?
I haven't tried it, but
options to dump.
How about putting this short wrapper in amanda's path?
#!/bin/sh
exec dump -L ${1+$@}
--
Joshua Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your object hit ratio is weak, old man
If you cache me now, I will dump more core than you can possibly imagine
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
The reason for this is that the pam code for doing the enforcement
is being trusted utterly. In the past, we would consider both
the primary group (the group from the passwd file entry), and the
auxillary groups (the groups from the groups file
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:20:45 MST, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Isn't this backwards? Code shouldn't be making assumptions about the
special meaning of numeric gids. What if you wanted to renumber gid
wheel to something else?
So? My primary group is
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 03:53:27PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been struggling upgrading kernel since beginning of April, and finally
found I have to add options LOOKUP_EXCLUSIVE to my kernel config file.
Without LOOKUP_EXCLUSIVE,
- some of the processes stall in inode state, and
... when I say bad I don't mean in execution. I mean that
the idea of a redirecting wrapper for one special program seems to
me an architectural wart that shouldn't be pushed on the userbase.
Not only does it conflict in style with the existing mailwrapper,
but it introduces a DWIM feature
