On 12/22/2013 12:25 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
companies can turn it on it they want it.
And if you want to save the few extra kB, you can turn it off...
On 12/21/2013 9:14 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a
On 11/24/2012 7:38 PM, Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
You have pkg-static for that kind of problems. You should rebuild pkg
port to get pkg working again.
So I still need /usr/ports when I use pkg?
No.
CURRENT is a special case because t
On 9/1/2012 7:43 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
I agree with Joh
On 8/30/2012 11:19 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
I today noticed the "pkg autoremove" command for the first time, which does much the same thing as
pkg_cutleaves but relies on the "automatic" flag in the pkgng database rather than user input to
determine which "leaf" ports can be removed. Unfortunate
On 8/24/2012 11:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/23/2012 8:03 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:59, Doug Barton wrote:
I tend to agree with Steve here ... we can't be responsible for other
people's poorly written docs.
This isn't about poorly written docs. This is the user expecting a
On 8/24/2012 3:57 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 18:19, Steve Wills wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap
would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is confusing that running the command gets
different results the secon
On 8/23/2012 6:26 PM, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
/var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a
database into the port installation/status, using
sed/grep/portmaster/portmanager/.sh scripts/find/
On 03/30/2012 01:10 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9
[...]
Please note that normally this will be the last beta version,
So we can expect an official package repositor
On 2/11/2012 2:13 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
Seems that the sqlite database
has changed from beta1 to beta3???
I have all the system running exclusive on pkg there is no more "old
pkg"
How can I upgrade the sqlite database from beta1 to beta3???
There is nothing to upgrade. The on-disk
On 12/13/2011 06:16 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 30/11/2011 22:32 Julien Laffaye said the following:
[1] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues
[2] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng
[3] : http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng
[4] : http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pkgng-bsdcan2011.pdf
[5] :
http
Hi all,
We are releasing pkgng (the next pkg_install) alpha2 to the world and we
want you to test it!
There is no "good" method to test it: use it as you would in the real
world. Of course, you are encouraged to backup your data or test it in some
kind of virtualized environment.
After using it
On 11/14/2011 12:45 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
In Arch Linux , package manager Pacman is using a configuration file
/etc/pacman.conf with its included files .
It is using a file such as the following ( some parts are deleted for
message ) :
( obtained from
http://www.archlinux.org/mirror
On 09/15/2011 16:42, Alisson wrote:
Somebody know when FreeBSD 9.0 Releng will be available?
When it is ready?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
On 08/03/2011 21:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
also the extension for the file is wrong (it should be txz, right?)
pkg_add still use the bzip2 format iirc.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-c
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Buganini wrote:
> https://github.com/buganini/rcexecr
>
> Currently it is able to determine the exec/wait order
>
> There are something I haven't digged in deeply in the "self modification"
> part.
>
> patches/ideas are welcome.
Hello,
Thanks for doing that!
Yo
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Developpement site: http://git.etoilebsd.net/pkgng/
FYI, we moved to github[1] in order to have a bug tracker, pull
request and code review.
Also, I recommend to build from the HEAD of the git repository, to not
report fixed compilati
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> At this time I'd just like to suggest you add the use of WAL journal
>> (http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_journal_mode) on database creation
>>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> if you are going to test on current please notice that make install
>> will overwrite /usr/lib/libpkg so pkg_* tools won't work anymore.
>>
>> We will workaround that later by renaming o
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
> 15:14:52 +0100):
>
>> 2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger :
>>>
>>> Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011
>>> 11:11:11 +0100):
>>>
pkgng is a binary package manager writte
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 25/03/2011 11:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> In term of technology we decided to use a sqlite3 database, and to
>> prevent potential trolling, sqlite3 is used in it's amalgamation form
>> which means it is incorporated in the code sou
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to
> do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
>
> 1. Get BIND out of the base!
> 2. If we remove it, the command line tools (dig, host, nslookup) go with it.
Dragonfl
23 matches
Mail list logo
