Re: HEADS UP: new libmp imported

2001-07-29 Thread Steve Price
I think I might have missed part of this thread so forgive me if this has already been brought up. We need to get a couple of package builds under our belts before this gets MFCd. I seem to recall there were a couple of ports that expected libgmp to be around. If so, we'll need to weed those

excessive paranoia in syslogd(8)?

2001-01-20 Thread Steve Price
Is it just me or does 'syslogd -s' exhibit just a little bit too much paranoia about allowing socket connections? I was futzing with a Perl script that needed to syslog(3) some stuff and after much hair pulling I realized that 'syslogd -s' didn't even allow connections from localhost.

Re: excessive paranoia in syslogd(8)?

2001-01-20 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:20:39PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: # # You can write to the /dev/log (usually symlinked to /var/run/log) # socket with '-s' set. # # If you want to or need to use network sockets, # # # syslogd -a localhost # # Should provide the behavior you want. As you noted

SMP kernel builds borked

2000-12-06 Thread Steve Price
Builds are failing for SMP kernels with sources CVSup'd a couple of hours ago using the GENERIC config file with the following diffs. Index: GENERIC === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v retrieving revision 1.291 diff

Re: Current kernel build failure -- cam_periph.c

2000-12-06 Thread Steve Price
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 06:13:50PM -0800, Manfred Antar wrote: # At 05:49 PM 12/6/2000 -0800, you wrote: # # I'm looking at this. My initial guess is maybe a gcc bug, as mtx_exit() # compiles in dozens of other places just fine (and has for months now). # # Yes # It's a different kind of

Re: make(1) patches to bypass quietness prescribed by @-prefixedcommands in Makefiles

2000-05-14 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 14 May 2000, Will Andrews wrote: # Some time ago I was complaining about how there is no way to force make(1) # to display the commands executed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles. [snip] I too like this idea and along the lines of what Lyndon suggested how about the attached patch

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: # I'm strongly suspecting something wrong with the encoding of the # certificate. Can you grab dumpasn1.c and dumpasn1.cfg from [snip] # Then: # # dumpasn1 file.der root@bonsai(/usr/local/etc/apache/ssl.key)# dumpasn1 server.key 0 2D 45: Unknown

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Doug Barton wrote: # Ok, here are some silly questions. Did you create a private key for # this server, did you encrypt your cert with it, and is that .key file # pointed to in your httpd.conf config file? SSLCertificateKeyFile is what # you're looking for.

'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' hangs

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
Jordan, I've been experiencing a problem with 'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' hanging. Attached is a patch that fixes this problem, cleans the code up a bit (IMHO), and still covers all the corner cases like 'pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/m4-1.1//./..///' like the old code did. :) BTW, it appears pkg_info had a

Re: 'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' hangs

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote: # It wouldn't cover the particular obscure case, but this is the sort of It was a pretty bizarre case, but the old code did cover this. Not saying whether I think it to be correct or not but... :) # thing that SUSv2's basename(3) would be appropriate

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-06 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote: # I've had this problem with recent values of OpenSSL since last # November. I haven't gotten around to playing with permutations of the # openssl.cnf file yet. I tried my site certificate on various versions # of Netscape and Exploder, and all of

RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-05 Thread Steve Price
Is anyone else noticing the following problems on their -current boxen? I first noticed when my apache webserver quit allowing secure connections with errors like this. [Fri May 5 20:46:19 2000] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (server new.host.name:443, client 127.0.0.1) (OpenSSL

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-05 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: # #define RSAREF_F_RSAREF_BN2BIN 101 # #define RSAREF_R_LEN 0x0406 # # RSARef can't handle keys 1024 bits long. This is a design limitation # which the license forbids us from fixing. # #

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-05 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Forrest Aldrich wrote: # FWIW, I've had a weird (perhaps related) problem, only in the # reverse. After creating a certificate (ie: 'make certificate' in # apache), I was unable to connect to the server from a Netscape # 4.72 browser. It only told me there was a decryption

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-05 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: # I'm suspecting it might be something missing in the ASN.1 encoding of the # certificate, which netscape requires but IE permits. This would be # consistent with a missing openssl.cnf file at the time of certificate # generation. Could one of you try

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-05 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: # How long ago was the previous port built? From the best I can remember it was sometime early to middle of March. # Do you still have the openssl # port installed, if it was built against that? Nope. -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-05 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: # It's not clear that you installed the openssl.cnf file before making the # cert - can you confirm? Yes I did. I put it in /etc/ssl as you suggested. -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the

Re: signal mask from jmp_buf

2000-04-06 Thread Steve Price
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Nate Williams wrote: # I am unfamiliar with the JDK port. Does it use FreeBSD native # threads? # # Nope, see above. If/when FreeBSD gets 'real' kernel threads, it would # be worthwhile to move it to using them, but until that team my suspicion # is the optimzed

signal mask from jmp_buf

2000-04-04 Thread Steve Price
Hi all, What is the proper way for obtaining the signal mask from within the jmp_buf struct on 4.x or -current? Previously with the JDK port for 3.x we did something like this: signalMask = jmpbuf[0]._sjb[6]; This no longer works now that we support 32 signals. Is there a better,

Re: linux sysctl knobs (was Re: RealPlayer 7)

2000-03-17 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Doug Barton wrote: # I've noticed that the Linux version reports the OS as "Linux 2.0.36" or # something like that. Is there anything special that will make the Linux # version of Netscape report the OS correctly? Maybe it should be doing # `uname -srm` or something

Re: troubles with X

1999-12-30 Thread Steve Price
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Dave J. Boers wrote: # I'm having the same problem. Cvsupped and recompiled -current just a few # hours ago. Then I recompiled X 3.3.5 and installed it. Now I can't start X # anymore either. Lines containing "Password:" just keep scrolling over my # terminal. The password

Re: troubles with X

1999-12-30 Thread Steve Price
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: # Here is the answer I was given by somebody on this list last week. # # #/etc/pam.conf # # tricky tricky forgive me # xserver authsufficient pam_permit.so no_use # # If we don't match anything else, default to using

troubles with X

1999-12-27 Thread Steve Price
Hi all, I just rebooted my -current box for the first time in a long time. Everything on this box is freshly compiled (including X) as of only a couple of hours ago. I even mergemaster'd for good measure. For some reason now I can't startx(1) as either myself or root. I type startx and the

new sigaction struct

1999-11-07 Thread Steve Price
Marcel, Just curious as to what the motivation for re-ordering the sa_flags and sa_mask members in sigaction were? The manpage still describes the old order BTW. My Alpha box has been limping through a package build and I've noticed a number of ports that seem to be falling over for

Re: PNP ids missing in sio.c

1999-09-04 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: # The reason I didn't move the old ids wholesale is that the old system # matched against the vendor id (which is bogus for multifunction cards). # The new system matches with the logical device id which is often different # from the vendor id. Some simple

PNP ids missing in sio.c

1999-09-03 Thread Steve Price
Can anyone think of a good reason why I can't migrate the old PNP ids to the new sio.c? I just rebooted my box with a fresh kernel and much to my shagrin (sp?) my USR PNP modem didn't work anymore. The following patch got it working again. Index: sio.c

Re: alpha kernel build failure (w/patch)

1999-07-05 Thread Steve Price
[trimmed -alpha from cc: list to keep the cross posting police from coming after me :)] On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Parag Patel wrote: # On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:33:57 CDT, Steve Price wrote: # +#ifdef __i386__ # sc-wb_btag = I386_BUS_SPACE_IO; # +#endif # +#ifdef __alpha__ # +sc-wb_btag

alpha kernel build failure (w/patch)

1999-07-04 Thread Steve Price
Anyone object to me fixing the wb driver so kernel builds on the Alpha don't fall over anymore? The patch was gleened from the similar changes to the al driver. Thanks. -steve Index: if_wb.c === RCS file:

Re: libg2c.a in -current

1999-05-23 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 23 May 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # Index: Makefile # === # RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/lib/libg2c/Makefile,v # # +beforeinstall: # + ${INSTALL} -C -o ${BINOWN} -g ${BINGRP} -m 444 ${.CURDIR}/g2c.h \ # +

libg2c.a in -current

1999-05-22 Thread Steve Price
Anyone know why libf2c* was renamed to libg2c* in egcs? Does egcs have a replacement for f2c? Would anyone object if I installed the header file, g2c.h, along with the library? -steve Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: missing file fla.h from current sources

1999-05-08 Thread Steve Price
Peter Wemm (pe...@freebsd.org) just committed a fix for this in files.i386. You should be able to grab a copy from your favorite CVSup mirror in less than an hour. -steve On Sat, 8 May 1999, Manfred Antar wrote: # When trying to build a kernel from current sources # I get this error when doing

latest ppp with PAP/CHAP coredumps

1999-05-08 Thread Steve Price
Brian, I CVSup'd earlier this morning and did a 'make world' on my -current box. If I try to use PAP/CHAP authentication, then ppp coredumps. Without using PAP/CHAP it seems to work fine. It also works when I did a cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ppp cvs update -Dyesterday -PAd

Re: BitKeeper (was Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files)

1999-05-01 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 1 May 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: # #:BitKeeper should be ready soon. #: #:Once it's been proven stable, might it be a better alternative to CVS? #: #:H # # Maybe, but we wouldn't know for a couple of years. You don't just go # trusting 15+ years worth of source history to a

Re: (FWD) Re: Progs linked against libstdc++ dead...

1999-04-30 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # These are good questions, and I don't know enough yet about the issues # surrounding vtable thunks to answer them. # # I haven't had time to really dig into this yet. Hopefully Saturday. I'm # about to revert the change until I can see what the

Re: (FWD) Re: Progs linked against libstdc++ dead...

1999-04-29 Thread Steve Price
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, John Polstra wrote: # - Forwarded message from Steve Price spr...@hiwaay.net - # # Since the vtable thunks are more efficient and will eventually # be the default, we might ought to stick with them. David mentioned # that there might be problems with them

Re: Progs linked against libstdc++ dead...

1999-04-28 Thread Steve Price
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3: Undefined # symbol __vt_7filebuf # # I'm rather tied up until Sunday. So it will be few days unti I can # really take a look at this. Until then, patches gladly accepted. Remember you asked. :-)

Re: emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-09 Thread Steve Price
On 9 Apr 1999, Joel Ray Holveck wrote: # I've found where this problem is coming from. It's in # emacs20.3/src/s/freebsd.h. It sets a macro called BSD_SYSTEM based upon the # version number contained in __FreeBSD__, checking for 1, 2 and 3. Of # course, -current uses 4. I have found that

Re: Vtable thunks with egcs

1999-04-08 Thread Steve Price
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # I'm assuming that the default for egcs uses vtable thunks instead of # offsets in the vtable to handle multiple inheritance. # # At the moment, yes. # # It occurred to me that since this changes the C++ calling convention, # we have to bump the

emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-08 Thread Steve Price
You are absolutely right. I just tried the new version of emacs that I built on my pre-egcs box and it doesn't work on that box either. This definitely doesn't appear to be anything caused by changing to egcs. Not that it matters much but for grins I just built/installed the xemacs port and it

Re: X problems using egcs as compiler

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
David O'Brien forwarded me a message a couple of days ago that contains a fix that may help. You need to add the following line at line 301 in target.make -u __deregister_frame_info \ -steve On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote: # Got the latest egcs port # # # $Id: Makefile,v

Re: X problems using egcs as compiler

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # Just tried to compile apache and apache's jserv and got hit by the # above bug so I hope that this gets resolved prior to using egcs as the # default. # # I doubt it will. Me too. :/ # I expect there will be significant breakage of non-world after

Re: X problems using egcs as compiler

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # I'm not sure the best way to approach this. The specification file used # in the port is different from the one that will be in the base system. # (the on in the Port is more stock EGCS) The base system will have many # more of our hacks. I don't know

Re: X problems using egcs as compiler

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: # Better yet, can we just run with this today instead of tomorrow? I # see no reason to wait any further, and some of us have more time this # weekend to work on testing things which a Sunday schedule would # collapse to less than half a day. You're

Re: Switching to EGCS on Saturday (PST)

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # I guess we could do it today. # # But there might be some that were planning on doing a final CVSup # tonight, since the announcement was for Sunday. They can always CVSup the latest bits and 'cvs co -D...' if they are getting the repository. They can

Re: X problems using egcs as compiler

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # Better yet, can we just run with this today instead of tomorrow? # # Can someone with a FAST machine do a CVSup from Freefall and `make world' # to verify that it is not broken? Doing it now. Going out to grab a bite to eat with the family but I

Re: Switching to EGCS on Saturday (PST)

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote: # # # No. Don't. Please stick to reported change times. 'cvs co -D' is a # desperate last measure. Something that someone playing with bleeding edge bits should be willing to do, IMHO. # # On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Steve Price wrote: # # On Sat, 3 Apr

Re: Switching to EGCS on Saturday (PST)

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote: # Something that someone playing with bleeding edge bits should # be willing to do, IMHO. # # That's ridiculous. There's substantial work ongoing in 4.0 with enough # people involved that changing things around for the hell of it and not # sticking to

Re: HEADS UP -- move to EGCS as base compiler

1999-04-02 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # Hi all, # # Baring unforeseen problems, I plan to pull the switch on Sunday that will # make EGCS the base compiler in 4.0-CURRENT. # # A CVSup and a `build world' after I pull the switch should be all that is # necessary to give you the new compiler.

Re: UPDATE2: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-03-08 Thread Steve Price
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, S?ren Schmidt wrote: # All that aside I'm willing to look closer into the possibility of # this being the problem. How does one go about obtaining a copy of # the raw disklabels? And once I have them how do I verify them for # correctness? # # Hmm, the only thing I can

Re: UPDATE2: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-03-08 Thread Steve Price
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Mike Smith wrote: # I'd be more worried that they're going to different places _after_ # they've read the disklabel. If they couldn't read the disklabel, you # wouldn't be mounting the disk in the first place. # # Is your disk dedicated in some way? Nope not knowingly. I

Re: UPDATE2: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-03-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: # Are you sure it tries to probe the slave ?? # Could please try to have it printout scp-devices in ata_probe ?? # # Here is a log of an attempted boot with ATA_DEBUG defined. It looks like # ata_probe() detected a slave where there isn't one. # #

Re: UPDATE2: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-03-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: # Just for grins I changed the ata_probe to ignore all but the first # controller and it is back to the ufs_dirbad panic. :( # # I never had the ufs_dirbad panic. With the 4 March driver, my system # works very well and probes all the ATA devices. Very

Re: UPDATE2: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-03-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Mike Smith wrote: # # From the context I've seen, the 'ufs_dirbad' panic is almost certainly # due to corrupted disk input. I definitely can't rule that out as a possibility, but it does make it difficult to explain how the old driver works on this machine. I'm typing this

Re: UPDATE2: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-03-05 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, S?ren Schmidt wrote: # Second update to the new ATA/ATAPI driver: # # Now all actual probing of both ATA ATAPI devices are done after # interrupts are enabled, this kills the last unwanted interrupts # (and there is no ugly hacks like in the old driver to avoid them). #

Re: UPDATE2: ATA/ATAPI driver new version available.

1999-03-05 Thread Steve Price
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, S?ren Schmidt wrote: # It seems Steve Price wrote: # # This works a little better on my machine. It doesn't panic # anymore more. It just hangs where it used to panic. Should # I turn on the DEBUG output, hand scribe the output, and send # it to you? # # That would

Using Soren's new ATA driver

1999-03-04 Thread Steve Price
What are the steps one needs to take in order to help test Soren's new ATA driver? I tweaked the MAKEDEV script to create /dev/ad0* and added the lines to my kernel config file as suggested in Soren's commit message. Both my HD and CD are found but when it goes to set the root device I get this:

Re: CardBus Support (was: support for 3Com 3C575 network controller?)

1999-02-21 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Nathan Dorfman wrote: # I looked at PAO, but it doesn't appear to support the 3.X # branch, which I'm running. If there's a PAO for 3.X, please # let me know where it is (!). # # That's why I can't run PAO (and consequently no PCMCIA working on my # laptop at the

/etc/pccard_ether troubles

1999-02-21 Thread Steve Price
Hi All, Anyone have any objections (now that we have dhclient in the tree) to pointing pccard_ether at its new home? -steve Index: pccard_ether === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/pccard_ether,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10

Re: support for 3Com 3C575 network controller?

1999-02-15 Thread Steve Price
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, Doug White wrote: # CardBus cards aren't supported. Period. Eek, I didn't realize this was a CardBus card. :{ I quess this begs the question though, is anyone working on CardBus support for FreeBSD since this is the 32-bit version of PCMCIA? Yes I understand they are

support for 3Com 3C575 network controller?

1999-02-13 Thread Steve Price
Is anyone out there successfully using a 3Com 3C375 network controller in there laptop? I got a new Dell Inspiron 7000 that came with one of these jewels and I haven't been able to find the trick to make it work. Here are some specifics. If you need more info please let me know. - The model

gzip(1) hanging

1999-01-04 Thread Steve Price
Hi all, I've got a -current box freshly CVSup'd and built from last night that is exhibiting some rather bizarre behavior. I actually noticed the problem on my Alpha package building machine, but the same behavior exists on my i386 box. To see what I'm seeing (or maybe not :) all you have to

Re: gzip(1) hanging

1999-01-04 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 6 Nov 1999, Nate Williams wrote: # I've got a -current box freshly CVSup'd and built from last # night that is exhibiting some rather bizarre behavior. I # actually noticed the problem on my Alpha package building # machine, but the same behavior exists on my i386 box. # # To see