I also have the exact same panic on a Dell motherboard with a Haswell processor.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:05 PM monochrome wrote:
>
> I have confirmed that r365487 is the last kernel that will boot on my
> 2400G. These are the files changed between r365487 and r365488:
>
> Usys/vm/phys_page
maybe try a clean buildworld, update /usr/src to the latest version, rm -rf
/usr/obj, then make buildworld && make installworld && make kernel and see
if that fixes the issue?
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:57 AM, John wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When trying to upgrade from 11-stable to 12-current, make inst
I have a few still sitting in a corner with FreeBSD 7 or 8 on them. Someday i
might put them back on with FreeBSD but not anytime soon
Sent from far away...
> On Mar 25, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone [still] use Opteron 6100-series / "Magny-Cours" processors with
>
I have the same compilation error when I tried to build current today as well.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Today, I upgraded to r296308 and had this failure during buildworld:
>>
>> ===> usr.bin/mkesdb_static (obj,build-tools)
>> cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/
Ya, that seems elegant.
Jack
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
>
>> Do you mean, you want some KPI like
>> boolean taskqueue_is_draining(struct taskqueue *p);
>> so that e.g. ex
But if you've disabled interrupts why would an "interrupt-handling task"
even run??
Jack
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how a driver is supposed to shut down its
> interrupt-handling taskqueue when it detaches
Awesome news my friend. I got distracted with some fire drills this week,
but
I'll make it a priority to get the ixl changes committed next week.
Thanks to you and everyone involved for getting this done.
Jack
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> I've just finish
The changes to igb were to add IPV6 support which previously was only in
ixgbe, the
transmit path code came from that code base, we did not see this issue in
testing. Its
not a simple matter of a few lines of code, I think we need to go forward
not back... I'll
look at the code.
Jack
O
What do you think about this change?
Cheers,
Jack
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> Sigh, this ends up being ugly I'm afraid. I need some time to look at
>> code and think about it.
>
Sigh, this ends up being ugly I'm afraid. I need some time to look at code
and think about it.
Jack
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > I'm travelling back to San Jose today; poke me tomorrow a
No, you do not need to commit this, the next drop of my internal
code already has this in it, and should be coming shortly, but thanks
anyway.
Jack
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to commit this patch.
> PCI-E Bus Speed is
I need to know the details on the hardware this is on, and was it working
on some previous
version of FreeBSD and broke in STABLE or what?
Jack
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Kamil Czekirda wrote:
> Jack, do you have any ideas to resolve problem, on new Debian 7 and Ubuntu
> 13.
link:
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement
Any questions or concerns may be sent to me.
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
I don't know, in some ways it might be more interesting to make something
just for a virtualized device, however reality is that I have way too many
higher priority items to worry about after the new year gets underway than
that, even so, we can see...
Jack
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:
me a favor and hold off until I'm technically back from
vacation (after the new year) and let me review the code then?
Thanks,
Jack
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> This patch implements two features for the 'lem' driver that
> greatly improve the thro
Look again closely, AFBR-703SDZ-IN2 and AFBR-703SDDZ-IN1 are supported,
AFBR-703SDZ-IN is not.
Jack
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just had this card installed in our servers:
>
> ix0@pci0:12:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x7a118086 c
Interesting, lem is all the non-pcie hardware, and if you see better
performance
out of the LEGACY path then I'm OK with changing the default.
Jack
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> if_lem.c ("lem", one of the e1000 drivers) has 2 possible interrupt mode
Yes, it was. Now if I can just figure out what's going on with sparc....
Jack
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:55:48PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > The follwoing error occurs hwen trying to compile a kernel (make
> > b
Someone with sparc build experience want to look at this and maybe see
something I'm missing,
this error makes no sense to me, these are defined in ixgbe_type.h and I
see nothing architecture sensitive??
Jack
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:51 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox
wrote:
> TB --- 2012-01-
Set the storm threshold to 0, that will disable it, its going to throttle
your performance
when it happens.
Jack
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> Some tests with updated FreeBSD to 8-stable as of today, compared with the
> previous run
>
>
>
> On 06.1
You can't get line rate with ixgbe, in what configuration/hardware?
We surely do get line rate in validation here, but its sensitive to
your hardware and config.
Jack
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:15:09PM +0200, Daniel Kalch
Interrupts are not enabled til after that is set, so I don't think this
theory
works, sorry.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:48 PM, K. Macy wrote:
> This recent commit changed the way that the value for size being
> passed to m_getjcl is initialized. Not seeing any obvious bugs
Awesome, glad to see this happening :)
Jack
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Current maximum number of CPUs supported by the FreeBSD kernel is 32.
> That number cames from indirectly by the fact that we have a cpumask_t
> type, representing a mask of CPUs, wh
I don't see why you are blaming em, you can see its on MSIX vectors
that are NOT storming, its something with USB as noted. Trying to
disable em from using MSIX is in exactly the wrong direction IMHO.
Jack
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On
Cool, thanks for the update! Good luck.
Jack
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thursday 05 May 2011 21:28:02 Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2011-May-05 13:22:59 +0200, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> > >Not yet. I'll reboot the machine lat
Not sure, I wondered if those seeing this had some special sequence of
actions they took for granted that is different than what we do in house...
In any case, the init really is ultimately a correctness thing, so let's
just
call it good :)
Jack
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Olivier S
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > OK, but what this does not explain is why I do not see this if
> > its so easily reproduced, what causes the failure case, any idea?
> >
> It is c
OK, but what this does not explain is why I do not see this if
its so easily reproduced, what causes the failure case, any idea?
As I said, given the code was not feasible for igb anyway I would not
be unhappy about returning to the old way of doing things.
Jack
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:03 PM
BIOS upgrades or something like that on your motherboard?
Regards,
Jack
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2011 00:15:43 you wrote:
> > This all looks completely kosher, what IRQ is the storm on??
>
> IRQ 16. Further down this email there
Right, it was you Wiktor :) Oh, so yours is sort of a special case.
Thanks,
Jack
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
> 2011/5/4 Jack Vogel :
> > This is the second report in a matter of a week perhaps about a
> problematic
> > motherboard, I woul
This all looks completely kosher, what IRQ is the storm on??
Jack
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 04 May 2011 20:47:32 Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Will you please set it back to a default and then boot and capture the
> > message f
To help me give me a complete pciconf -lv, and if its a namebrand system
tell me that, including all hardware in it.
If you like Olivier I can make a version of em for you that also reverts the
setup code the way I did for igb, see if that fixes it for you?
Thanks for your
Will you please set it back to a default and then boot and capture the
message for me?
Thank you,
Jack
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> Wednesday 04 May 2011 19:46:05 Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Who makes your motherboard? The problem you are havi
problematic
motherboard, I would like to know who makes them.
Thanks,
Jack
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Daan Vreeken wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've just updated a machine to -current (r221321) and since then I'm seeing
> an
> interrupt storm on irq 16. The storm goes away whe
No, I do not Arnaud. But I refuse to rise to rude and uncivil behavior. Its
your
behavior again and again which causes you to not get responses, not my
willingness to help and respond to those that behave like respectful
customers
and adults.
Jack
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Arnaud
faces beside Intel they also consume mbufs
remember.
Jack
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Michael Schmiedgen wrote:
> On 03.05.2011 23:24, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> If you get the setup receive structures fail, then increase the
>> nmbclusters.
>>
>> If you use standa
If you get the setup receive structures fail, then increase the nmbclusters.
If you use standard MTU then what you need are mbufs, and standard size
clusters (2K).
Only when you use jumbo frames will you need larger.
You must configure enough, its that simple.
Jack
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:13
Yes Mike, already have had a couple others bug me to get the MFC, I'm hoping
to get it in this week :)
Jack
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 4/27/2011 2:45 PM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> >> Are you testing with what is in HEAD ? ie. 7.2.3 or something
If you get "cannot setup receive structures" you cannot go on and try to
use the thing :) It means you have inadequate mbuf clusters to setup
your receive side, you simply have to increase it and reload the driver.
Jack
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2
is you
get
allocation of the mbufs first when static, and something else is taking them
before you can load when loadable??
I suspect all will be fine if you increase the pool size that you are using.
Jack
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 3/31/2011 11:20 AM, Olivier
Oh crap, sorry, fix coming shortly.
Jack
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Michael Butler
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Seems there are a couple of defines missing from an e1000_hw.h
>
> ===> igb (all)
>
> [ .. snip .. ]
>
> /usr/
, but the protocol checksums
might as well be available too.
Jack
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I had occasion to think about this, and I was wondering if someone is
>> working to add
>&g
I had occasion to think about this, and I was wondering if someone is
working to add
either or both of these features, Intel's hardware supports it, it does not
seem that
hard to add, or am I missing something?
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-cu
inux contributes to it
> and
> > thus has far more people submitting changes than any other list.
> >
> > is there a case where the old list has an entry the mares list is
> missing?
>
>Most of the values (above 99%) were the same actually between the
> 2 l
m the one[1] with (well, not the only one, ICH9 should be quite
> popular)
> "http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte"; device.
>
> best regards,
> - Jakub Lach
>
JFYI, the sourceforge site is where Intel updates its data, and until this
post I was
already un
line, this is a critical fix for 82575: SVN rev 210968
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Cool, glad its resolved.
Jack
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> Just wanted to give everybody some closure on this issue: Through the
> magic of a JTAG debugger, I was able to identify that the problem was
> an infinite loop in the BIOS's SMI handler. I&
ystem
I'm using has nothing.
Otherwise its possible there is a hardware revision difference. Have you
tried 8 REL ?
I'm up and rebuilding a kernel on it right now.
Jack
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> amd64 exhibits the same problem, except that it's not e
LOL, ok, I'm beating the bushes here Ryan, and I think I can get a system
although it may be a day or two. Will let you know.
Jack
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> amd64 exhibits the same problem, except that it's not even polite and
> panics wit
What if you use amd64, have you tried that? Low level code is different.
Interesting however, maybe I can get access to one around here, will see.
Jack
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> I'm trying to bring up a new board based on Intel's Jasper Forest x86
&g
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:54 AM, joe wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 02:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
>> damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
>> it.
>>
>> Jack
The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
it.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, joe wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 01:53 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> I still am not clear on this syste
I still am not clear on this system, how many ports are on it, and its an
82576?
Sounds to me like you've proven its not on the box if you can do fine when
its
on its own. So change ports in the switch, as I said, change cables, must be
something in that environment.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 20
Looks like something to do with system C, you might isolate it, and try a
back
to back connection with its NICs, change cables, look at BIOS settings,
change
the slot the nic is in... All just off the top of my head.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM, joe wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 11:17
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 09 April 2010 3:09:24 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Someone else also pointed this out. I'm dubious about its claim.
> > This happens because there is an RX lock taken in rxeof, its held
> > thru the ca
nefit. At least try it
and see.
Jack
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 03:29 PM 4/10/2010, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> Added the missing locks around calls to rxeof and checked it in a minute
>> ago.
>>
>> Sorry guys!
>>
>
> Looks good
Added the missing locks around calls to rxeof and checked it in a minute
ago.
Sorry guys!
Jack
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>
> At 05:11 PM 4/
Don't know, but I would just ignore it, I think its a false warning anyway.
Jack
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 04:13 PM 4/9/2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:09:24PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> > Someone else
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:09:24PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Someone else also pointed this out. I'm dubious about its claim.
>
> I can't reproduce the LOR with latest em(4)(r206429).
>
>
Hmmm, wonder what
r not have to give it up, can someone look
at it and advise?
Cheers,
Jack
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> While testing an i5 box with HEAD checked out from this morning, bringing
> up the second NIC generated this LOR on the console
>
> em1: link state chan
oming first thing Monday.
Jack
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> OH, as to my last statement, the code in CURRENT will NOT work on 8.0
>> RELEASE,
>> it would require a change to sys/conf/files,
OH, as to my last statement, the code in CURRENT will NOT work on 8.0
RELEASE,
it would require a change to sys/conf/files, and it also has a fix in the
stack that is not
in RELEASE. SO taking the latest would require you take the whole tree.
Jack
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Jack Vogel
The device subfamily on those motherboards is called PCH, and its only in
the em driver as of
last December, The CVS delta of if_em is 1.27. You can either update to
STABLE/8 or CURRENT.
If you wish to just pull the e1000 driver directory it should work fine in
8.0 RELEASE also.
Cheers,
Jack
Yes, I need to get the code MFC'd anyway, sorry, I just am constantly
fighting fires lately it seems :(
I'll try to get on it.
Jack
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Hi Jack,
>Any chance on MFC'ing this version of the em driver ? I hav
In this mail:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?
fetch=29403+32287+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-scsi/20030615.freebsd-
scsi
It was suggested to do a backtrace on it. I didn't have the option in 5.1-
RELEASE, but I grabbed the 20030624 snapshot and was able to get the
following informa
In this mail:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?
fetch=29403+32287+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-scsi/20030615.freebsd-
scsi
It was suggested to do a backtrace on it. I didn't have the option in 5.1-
RELEASE, but I grabbed the 20030624 snapshot and was able to get the
following informa
560:3414289560(0) win 65535 (ttl 64, id 12226, len 60)
19:28:35.946877 10.0.0.2.12865 > 10.0.0.1.49187: S [bad tcp cksum 751c!]
2862099494:2862099494(0) ack 3414289561 win 57344 (ttl 64, id 27150, len 60)
can anyone help me?
Jack
553 01214652277 0 10461 0
I am using 4.6 -stable and 5.0 -current
Can anyone help me?
Best regards=3D20
Jack Zhang
_
Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/
To Unsubscribe: send
63503460151240879%1858 1401212% /
>
> Has anyone run into this one?
Yes, with softupdates enabled on /
> Is there a way of fixing it?
tunefs -n disable / worked for me.
------
Jack O'Nei
Today Warner Losh wrote:
> boot.flp288
The M$ weenies would probably choke on that since they do
filenames other than 8.3 with smoke and mirrors.
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems
No
such file or directory
/usr/ports/security/openssh/work/ssh/lib/../authfd.c:27: openssl/rsa.h: No
such file or directory
>When you do this (once) you'll be able to build openssh. Is this clear now?
After a make world after rsaref was installed openssh did build
(and work :).
e were a bit cleaner ;) ).
>
> And anyways Jordan, I cannot remember you having notified -doc of your
> problems. So you get to get a piece of the blame yourself as well. =)
>
>
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECT
f/strip: /usr/local/bin/jade: No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
------
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
Finger [EMAIL PROTEC
rrently on xfree86.org, dated Jan 10, does.
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key.
PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67 FD 09 E9 3C 5
Today Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I suspect I'm not the only mirror operator who sees a huge load spike
> early in the morning:
I plead guilty, your honor.
When are the low load times.
--
J
e USA_RESIDENT value out of /etc/make.conf?
> Am I missing something here?
It's probably looking in ${CHROOTDIR}/etc/make.conf and finding
the freshly cvs co'ed copy with that commented out. :(
--
Jack O'Neill
On Jan 17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, jack wrote:
>
> > On Jan 17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > > + rm -f /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa
> > >
> > > Doh, I meant /bin/rm
> >
> > No, you meant ${RM}
>
&
On Jan 17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > + rm -f /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa
>
> Doh, I meant /bin/rm
No, you meant ${RM}
------
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTE
no/blank disc inside, unlocked
ata_command: timeout waiting for interrupt
------
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
Finger [EMA
the cleanest
and most straight forward install program he's seen. Guess he,
like I, is more concerned with functionality than flash. :)
------
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analy
would certainly be
> pretty unusable).
I just tried only netscape in my .xinitrc and it worked fine. As
well as "ddd ${WINDOW_MANAGER}" or "xterm" run from .xinitrc has
for me in the past.
--
Jac
Thanks Jonathan.
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key.
PGP Key fingerprint =
o date MAKEDEV and remake the
devices.
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key.
PGP Key fingerprint
Today Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> On [19991016 04:00], jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Today Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >> hey If someone did adopt it then it wouldn't be a problem..
> >> if no-on edoes then it can remain 'unsupported'
>
Today Julian Elischer wrote:
> hey If someone did adopt it then it wouldn't be a problem..
> if no-on edoes then it can remain 'unsupported'
unsupported != tucked away in the attic, out of reach of
many/most users.
--
river as "stale" rather
than gone.
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key.
PGP Key fingerprint = F
tcha is that is for linux so I will have to
> translate the linux scsi commands to CAM.
cdrecord-1.8a22 includes cdda2wav, no translation necessary. :)
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator /
?
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
j...@germanium.xtalwind.net Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
Finger j...@germanium.xtalwind.net for my PGP key.
PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67 FD 09 E9
zed variables in either the install or upgrade case.
I'll watch for commit messages. I've got 3 pre-/etc/default 3.x
boxen I can upgrade and two junk drives where I can test fresh
installs.
--
Jack O'Neill
t for the "...just the overrides..." header.
For an `upgrade' install it copies _all_ of the old rc.conf
values into the new one, advertising them as just the overrides.
--
Jack O'NeillSyst
not really oppposed to this
concept I'd just like to see it documented in the distribution so
that the lists aren't over run with questions when it hits the
street and those who haven't been `heads uped' by the lists are
in a state of confusion.
--
c/rc.conf only contains changes from the defaults when
man something_or_other tells the user to find and edit
something_or_other_flags in /etc/rc.conf the entry won't be
there to edit.
------
Jack O'NeillSystems Ad
sion over wcd in /dev with everything else refering to it as
acd, and no documentation about when to just ignore
"tagged openings now ". Both of these issues are already popping
up in questions and the news groups.
-
the verbosity to suit individual
> preferences would be a good way to go?
It is keyed to bootverbose, but `or'ed with 1. Perhaps a
sysctl(8) knob, kern.verbosity, is worth thinking about.
--
Jack O'Neill
t's the point in spamming everyone's consoles? Just 'cause
it's flu season is no reason for _everyone_ to constantly use a
rectal thermometer.
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Adm
hanged to `|| crs->openings < some
critical number' in cam_xpt.c. As it is now a boy and a wolf
come to mind.
Also, I suspect having acd in the kernel and wcd in MAKEDEV may
lead to confusion for some people.
--
J
u're still
using it you're on your own, edit it as you wish. :)
--
Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst
j...@germanium.xtalwind.net Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
97 matches
Mail list logo
