On 12/7/16 10:57 AM, K. Macy wrote:
A MachO activator is indeed not useful without an OSX install.
But let's be honest, Mach IPC is a loadable kernel module requiring no real
kernel changes. It's not upstreamable because of a general poor
understanding of IPC by noisy commentators and a rel
On 08/12/2016 09:15, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote:
Thankx for all comments. I know and understood all difficult.
I'll have to spend my money on the purchase a Machintosh machine.
Now that bhyve has gui support can OSX be started as a bhyve guest?
Has anyone tried to get an openfirmware load
On 8 Dec 2016, at 14:07, mokhi wrote:
> I had started a writing a Mach-O image activator monthes ago, but
> time/daily-life distracted me from continuing it.
> Maybe some day I continue it :D
> Currently it's available on my github[1] if it helps.
> I had some success-like running of some super-s
> Have you considered adding it to the FreeBSD Google Summer of Code Ideas
> wiki[2]?
> Maybe some brave student will like the idea and decide to spend some time on
> this project.
No I didn't, maybe it worth doing it :)
I can do it if you suggest.
I myself was brave (but officially mentor-les
I had started a writing a Mach-O image activator monthes ago, but
time/daily-life distracted me from continuing it.
Maybe some day I continue it :D
Currently it's available on my github[1] if it helps.
I had some success-like running of some super-simple less-than 'return
A+B' programs with it :)
Em Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:57:36 +, K. Macy escreveu
> >
> >
> >
> A MachO activator is indeed not useful without an OSX install.
>
> But let's be honest, Mach IPC is a loadable kernel module requiring
> no real kernel changes. It's not upstreamable because of a general poor
> understanding of IP
>
>
>
A MachO activator is indeed not useful without an OSX install.
But let's be honest, Mach IPC is a loadable kernel module requiring no real
kernel changes. It's not upstreamable because of a general poor
understanding of IPC by noisy commentators and a religious aversion to a
technology perce
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:31:06 -0500
"Kevin P. Neal" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:49:07PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sorry for cross posting (-current and -ports)
> >
> >
> > Is there any emulator like linuxator to run Mac OS X binaries, or
> > is ther any licensing pro
On 5 Dec 2016, at 19:31, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
>
>> Is there any emulator like linuxator to run Mac OS X binaries, or
>> is ther any licensing problem?
>
> It may be possible to make an emulator for Darwin (the OS that Mac OS sits
> on top of), but an emulator for Mac OS would probably require a
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:49:07PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sorry for cross posting (-current and -ports)
>>
>>
>> Is there any emulator like linuxator to run Mac OS X binaries, or
>> is ther any licensing problem?
>
> It may
10 matches
Mail list logo