Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 12/7/16 10:57 AM, K. Macy wrote: A MachO activator is indeed not useful without an OSX install. But let's be honest, Mach IPC is a loadable kernel module requiring no real kernel changes. It's not upstreamable because of a general poor understanding of IPC by noisy commentators and a

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-08 Thread Shane Ambler
On 08/12/2016 09:15, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: Thankx for all comments. I know and understood all difficult. I'll have to spend my money on the purchase a Machintosh machine. Now that bhyve has gui support can OSX be started as a bhyve guest? Has anyone tried to get an openfirmware

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-08 Thread Mateusz Piotrowski
On 8 Dec 2016, at 14:07, mokhi wrote: > I had started a writing a Mach-O image activator monthes ago, but > time/daily-life distracted me from continuing it. > Maybe some day I continue it :D > Currently it's available on my github[1] if it helps. > I had some success-like

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-08 Thread mokhi
> Have you considered adding it to the FreeBSD Google Summer of Code Ideas > wiki[2]? > Maybe some brave student will like the idea and decide to spend some time on > this project. No I didn't, maybe it worth doing it :) I can do it if you suggest. I myself was brave (but officially

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-08 Thread mokhi
I had started a writing a Mach-O image activator monthes ago, but time/daily-life distracted me from continuing it. Maybe some day I continue it :D Currently it's available on my github[1] if it helps. I had some success-like running of some super-simple less-than 'return A+B' programs with it :)

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-07 Thread Nilton Jose Rizzo
Em Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:57:36 +, K. Macy escreveu > > > > > > > A MachO activator is indeed not useful without an OSX install. > > But let's be honest, Mach IPC is a loadable kernel module requiring > no real kernel changes. It's not upstreamable because of a general poor > understanding of

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-07 Thread K. Macy
> > > A MachO activator is indeed not useful without an OSX install. But let's be honest, Mach IPC is a loadable kernel module requiring no real kernel changes. It's not upstreamable because of a general poor understanding of IPC by noisy commentators and a religious aversion to a technology

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-07 Thread Matthieu Volat
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:31:06 -0500 "Kevin P. Neal" wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:49:07PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for cross posting (-current and -ports) > > > > > > Is there any emulator like linuxator to run Mac OS X binaries, or > > is

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-07 Thread David Chisnall
On 5 Dec 2016, at 19:31, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > >> Is there any emulator like linuxator to run Mac OS X binaries, or >> is ther any licensing problem? > > It may be possible to make an emulator for Darwin (the OS that Mac OS sits > on top of), but an emulator for Mac OS

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

2016-12-07 Thread Warner Losh
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:49:07PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: >> >> >> Sorry for cross posting (-current and -ports) >> >> >> Is there any emulator like linuxator to run Mac OS X binaries, or >> is ther any