Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: > >> >And could you mention when the code freeze might be so that some of us >> >could plan our work? Perhaps I've missed something, but I hadn't heard >> >when the freeze would be. I have a *lot* of things to consider changing >> >before it.

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob >writes: > >> "This time of the year" == "This time in the release cycle" > >> > >> If we want to have a somewhat clean line before 4.0 now is the time > >> to push it through, not after the code fre

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: >> "This time of the year" == "This time in the release cycle" >> >> If we want to have a somewhat clean line before 4.0 now is the time >> to push it through, not after the code freeze. > >And could you mention when the code freeze might be

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
> "This time of the year" == "This time in the release cycle" > > If we want to have a somewhat clean line before 4.0 now is the time > to push it through, not after the code freeze. And could you mention when the code freeze might be so that some of us could plan our work? Perhaps I've missed s

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > This is a harmless message for the moment. I took a look at the new > > make_dev stuff- it's more than a no-brainer to add because there's a lot > > of stuff about supported device nodes, etc... I'll try and get back to

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >Matthew Jacob wrote: >> >> This is a harmless message for the moment. I took a look at the new >> make_dev stuff- it's more than a no-brainer to add because there's a lot >> of stuff about supported device nodes, etc... I'll try and get

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-12 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Matthew Jacob wrote: > > This is a harmless message for the moment. I took a look at the new > make_dev stuff- it's more than a no-brainer to add because there's a lot > of stuff about supported device nodes, etc... I'll try and get back to > this after FreeBSDcon. Funny, phk's comments led me t

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-11 Thread Matthew Jacob
This is a harmless message for the moment. I took a look at the new make_dev stuff- it's more than a no-brainer to add because there's a lot of stuff about supported device nodes, etc... I'll try and get back to this after FreeBSDcon. On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Andy Farkas wrote: > > Just a reminder

Re: scsi tape driver wants an update

1999-10-10 Thread Matthew Jacob
Huh? I'll check it out.. On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Andy Farkas wrote: > > Just a reminder I guess, > > # uname -v > FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 10 16:16:34 EST 1999 > > # mt retension > > console emits (in bright white): > > WARNING: driver sa should register devices with make_dev() (dev_