Re: some guidance on forked cvsup please

1999-01-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Now we've gone and got forked, can someone please give us examples of cvsup :files for those that want to follow 4-current and those that want to follow :3-stable. : :Thanks! It's real simple. The -stable is the 3.x branch. This is the branch that Jordan just created tonight. So

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-17 Thread Warner Losh
In message pine.bsf.4.05.9901152041370.558-100...@picnic.mat.net Chuck Robey writes: : In terms of convenience, cvsup is supreme, but in terms of stability, : Poul's baby here is the champ, so you have to really consider other : places of corruption first. I've had problems when I get 30 parts

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-16 Thread Boris Staeblow
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 08:46:23PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: Are you using any other tool besides ctm to touch your cvs archive? Are you doing commits locally? No. In terms of convenience, cvsup is supreme, but in terms of stability, Poul's baby here is the champ, so you have to really

Re: Can't compile new kernel after CVSup...

1999-01-16 Thread Eddie Irvine
A number of things seem to be changing rapidly. 1) cvsup and Do a make buildworld/installworld. worked for me yesterday. 2) See if you can build the GENERIC kernel. Worked for me. 3) check the stuff in your custom kernel vs. the GENERIC. There has been some sizable changes. You'l have to do

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-16 Thread David Kelly
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Boris Staeblow wrote: Hello, Is it possible that there are slight differences between the CTM's and the real world ? Yes, there are differences. You can't get the optional security stuff via CTM while you can with CVSUP. Last time I tried it, this means you can't do

kernel build breaks after the latest cvsup

1999-01-16 Thread Rajesh Vaidheeswarran
Hello folks, I just did a cvsup and tried rebuilding world and the kernel, but I keep getting an error during the kernel linking stage. loading kernel syscons.o: In function `scvidprobe': syscons.o(.text+0x231): undefined reference to `vid_configure' syscons.o(.text+0x24e): undefined reference

Re: kernel build breaks after the latest cvsup

1999-01-16 Thread oZZ!!!
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote: Hello folks, I just did a cvsup and tried rebuilding world and the kernel, but I keep getting an error during the kernel linking stage. loading kernel syscons.o: In function `scvidprobe': syscons.o(.text+0x231): undefined reference

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-16 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to David Kelly: via CTM while you can with CVSUP. Last time I tried it, this means you can't do a make release as Jordan's release Makefiles can't handle a total absense of that stuff (eBones? whatever its called). It is available on internat.freebsd.org with CTM... -- Ollivier

Re: kernel build breaks after the latest cvsup

1999-01-16 Thread Chris Timmons
You probably need to add kbd0 and update sc0 in your kernel config file. Have a look in the GENERIC kernel config to see how it is done now... On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote: Hello folks, I just did a cvsup and tried rebuilding world and the kernel, but I keep getting

Re: kernel build breaks after the latest cvsup

1999-01-16 Thread Rajesh Vaidheeswarran
to add kbd0 and update sc0 in your kernel config file. Have a look in the GENERIC kernel config to see how it is done now... On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote: Hello folks, I just did a cvsup and tried rebuilding world and the kernel, but I keep getting an error during

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-16 Thread David Kelly
Ollivier Robert writes: According to David Kelly: via CTM while you can with CVSUP. Last time I tried it, this means you can't do a make release as Jordan's release Makefiles can't handle a total absense of that stuff (eBones? whatever its called). It is available on internat.freebsd.org

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-16 Thread Mark Murray
David Kelly wrote: It is available on internat.freebsd.org with CTM... And its legal for me to import it to the US? No problem. It is illegal to export _from_ the US. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-16 Thread Mark Murray
David Kelly wrote: While you can download the missing security stuff, make release wants to check it out of your local cvs archive. I haven't found a way to put it there but I'm a cvs novice. There is an international repository of crypto sources. Lemme know if you want it. M -- Mark Murray

CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-15 Thread Boris Staeblow
Hello, I'm using ctm-cvs for synchronizing my CVS-Tree. But sometimes I get MD5 checksum errors when apllying the ctm's. To resynchronize my ctm's with the CVS-Tree i have to use cvsup at ctm.freebsd.org with the option strictrcs. Many files have to be retransmitted and many fixup's appear

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-15 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Boris Staeblow: Is it possible that there are slight differences between the CTM's and the real world ? There should not be. Is CTM a little neglient when the diffs are generated? I cannot say anything else than it has been working for me for several years and the few times it

Re: CTM CVSUP differences

1999-01-15 Thread Chuck Robey
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Boris Staeblow wrote: Hello, I'm using ctm-cvs for synchronizing my CVS-Tree. But sometimes I get MD5 checksum errors when apllying the ctm's. To resynchronize my ctm's with the CVS-Tree i have to use cvsup at ctm.freebsd.org with the option strictrcs. Many files have

Can't compile new kernel after CVSup...

1999-01-15 Thread oZZ!!!
Hello! After cvsuped my source tree, i try to compile a new kernel, c following: # config -r MY_KERNEL # cd ../../compile/MY_KERNEL # make depend # make cc -c -O -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wredundant-decls -Wimplicit -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

<    2   3   4   5   6   7