On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Throwing a lock in every structure is
> one
> thing but then to tie the whole bundle up together is a completely
> different ballgame.
Yes, that's the hard part. It can be potentially dangerous to, for
example, call the mbuf resource alloc
Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> I don't believe so. There are several external resources, such as
> on-line papers, and so on. There is also a man page (which I've found
> from jasone's web space) which has been prepared by Sheldon Hearn and
> which should be at ~jake/mutex.9
> As
I don't believe so. There are several external resources, such as
on-line papers, and so on. There is also a man page (which I've found
from jasone's web space) which has been prepared by Sheldon Hearn and
which should be at ~jake/mutex.9
As far "standard way to do it" docum
On Friday, 22 September 2000 at 19:50:11 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Do we have a document that descibes in great detail the
> locking policy that the SMPng code should follow?
>
> I've seen several descriptionms as to how it might be done,
> but I haven't seen a "Ok we've decided that this is
Do we have a document that descibes in great detail the
locking policy that the SMPng code should follow?
I've seen several descriptionms as to how it might be done,
but I haven't seen a "Ok we've decided that this is the strategy
we are using" document.
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
