RE: Panic w/crash dump (looks like atomic.h problem)

2001-01-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Jan-01 Rogier Mulhuijzen wrote: > >>If you look at the traceback, vref() was called with a NULL vnode as its >>parameter, so the panic is due to dereferencing a NULL pointer, not a bug in >>the atomic ops. :) As to why the kernel was vref()'ing a NULL pointer, I >>have >>no idea. > >#11

Re: Panic w/crash dump (looks like atomic.h problem)

2001-01-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Rogier Mulhuijzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My next question is, where are those ??'s from in #12 - #15? Could they be > addresses in kernel modules? Quite possibly. > If so, how do I readable output from that, save compiling everything into > the kernel statically? Read the handbook sect

RE: Panic w/crash dump (looks like atomic.h problem)

2001-01-18 Thread Rogier Mulhuijzen
>If you look at the traceback, vref() was called with a NULL vnode as its >parameter, so the panic is due to dereferencing a NULL pointer, not a bug in >the atomic ops. :) As to why the kernel was vref()'ing a NULL pointer, I have >no idea. #11 0xc01c057f in vref (vp=0x0) at machine/atomic.h:33

RE: Panic w/crash dump (looks like atomic.h problem)

2001-01-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Jan-01 Rogier Mulhuijzen wrote: > Got a nice crash while running XMMS under X11 and running a 'make world -j > 128 -DNOCLEAN' on ttyv0 > > Current was cvsupped on the 17th in the morning (Central European Time) IIRC. > > Attached: script(1) output of gdb kernel trace >