Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2003-02-11 Thread phk
/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c: In function `g_bde_config': /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c:251: structure has no member named `slicesize' /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c:252: structure has no member named `sliceoffset' My fault, already fixed. --

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Dag-Erling Smorgrav: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- I don't think it is fixed, we are still getting reports 4600 lines long... Please someone do

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-12-27 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- [... 4421 lines of machine-generated spam deleted] Please fix the tinderbox so

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-12-27 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:932: (near initialization for `devfs_specop_entries[14]') *** Error code 1 This was broken by removing a unsed definition in: % RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.src,v % Working file:

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-09 Thread John Baldwin
On 09-Oct-2002 Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the ... Doing this screws up diffs to vendor source as there

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Nottebrock
David O'Brien wrote: I'm hoping for another 3.2.1 import soon. I raised some hell on the GCC lists last week about the quality of 3.2.1; and actually got some Athlon and p4 optimization PR's taken care of. Great, maybe I'll be able to use -march athlon again quite soon then. :) Today in my

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-09 Thread walt
=== usr.bin/truss syscalls.master: line 34: syscall number out of sync at 0 I see this too. The last time it was broken awk (IIRC) that was responsible, though it doesn't seem likely this time. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-09 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, walt wrote: === usr.bin/truss syscalls.master: line 34: syscall number out of sync at 0 I see this too. The last time it was broken awk (IIRC) that was responsible, though it doesn't seem likely this time. Looks like there was a merge problem with Peter's recent

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-09 Thread Peter Wemm
Robert Watson wrote: On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, walt wrote: === usr.bin/truss syscalls.master: line 34: syscall number out of sync at 0 I see this too. The last time it was broken awk (IIRC) that was responsible, though it doesn't seem likely this time. Looks like there was a

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread mgoward
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:41:40AM -0700 or thereabouts, Dag-Erling Smorgrav was said to have scribed: -- stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/i386/obj/local0/scratch/des/src/i386/usr/include

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Kabaev
./aicasm: 877 instructions used ./aicasm: 686 instructions used cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Alexander Kabaev wrote: ./aicasm: 877 instructions used ./aicasm: 686 instructions used cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. mkdep: compile failed ***

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so committing it onto the vendor

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Peter Wemm
David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:10:42PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the fix you

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the ... Doing this screws up diffs to vendor source as there won't be a tag that corisponds with

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-05 Thread Nate Lawson
Matt, something in your mcd commits (staticizing probe/attach) may have broken LINT. On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-05 Thread Mike Barcroft
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matt, something in your mcd commits (staticizing probe/attach) may have broken LINT. mcd.c intentionally creates an empty object file in the GEOM-defined (ie. LINT) case. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-05 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matt, something in your mcd commits (staticizing probe/attach) may have broken LINT. mcd.c intentionally creates an empty object file in the GEOM-defined (ie. LINT) case. Ah, sorry. That means phk's big

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson writ es: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matt, something in your mcd commits (staticizing probe/attach) may have broken LINT. mcd.c intentionally creates an empty object file in the GEOM-defined (ie.

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-05 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: It was my impression that people were trying to solve this issue so that mcd can coexist with GEOM properly. Indeed. I'm still working on removing the disklabel bits from mcd(4). I'll bandaid mcd_isa.c in the meantime. -- | Matthew N. Dodd |

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-25 Thread Jeff Roberson
The next one will pass. On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-18 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Fixed already. /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/netsmb/smb_usr.c: In function `smb_usr_t2request': /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/netsmb/smb_usr.c:332: warning: implicit declaration of function `m_fixhdr' /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/netsmb/smb_usr.c:345: warning: redundant redeclaration of `m_fixhdr'

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-10 Thread Andrew R. Reiter
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: :cc1: warnings being treated as errors :/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/dev/cardbus/cardbus.c: In function `cardbus_driver_added': :/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/dev/cardbus/cardbus.c:319: warning: unused variable :`cardattached' :*** Error code 1 I

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-02 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2002-09-01, Scott Long écrivait : === aic7xxx/ahc (null): Unable to malloc scope object *** Error code 70 Um, what? I just did a buildworld, followed by a buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC and did not see this. Um, I see this one as well, on a not-too-recent -CURRENT that I'm trying

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-09-01 Thread Scott Long
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 10:31:15PM -0700, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- [...] -- Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Aug 31 22:28:29 PDT 2002

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-20 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Dag-Erling Smorgrav: -- stage 4: building everything.. -- === usr.sbin/getextattr /local0/scratch/des/src/usr.sbin/getextattr/getextattr.c:139:40: multi-line

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-19 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2:

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-18 Thread Mathieu Arnold
--On dimanche 18 août 2002 21:56 -0700 Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-15 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
See my HEADS UP message to -CURRENT and the 20020815 entry to src/UPDATING. On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 08:38:41AM -0700, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
=== sbin/quotacheck /local0/scratch/des/src/sbin/quotacheck/preen.c:54:18: fsck.h: No such file or directory Already fixed. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-07-27 Thread Mike Barcroft
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -- Kernel build for LINT started on Fri Jul 26 23:27:37 PDT 2002 -- === LINT /local0/scratch/des/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT:

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-07-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: make: don't know how to make GENERIC. Stop Damn, my bad. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Wemm
Heh, you *did* ask for -Werror to be turned back on. :-) Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-07-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /home/des/tinderbox/tinderbox.sh: /usr/bin/nice -n 20: not found Bah. I am an idiot. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-27 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/06/26 19:00), Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Wed Jun 26 19:00:10 PDT 2002 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/bin/cvs: Shared object has no run-time symbol table I got this testing the RMEM_LIMIT patches, but it only crops up after about an hour of heavy ports building. You'll get this for

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-27 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/06/27 16:33), Sheldon Hearn wrote: I got this testing the RMEM_LIMIT patches, but it only crops up after about an hour of heavy ports building. You'll get this for just any binary that uses mmap(). Unfortunately, I haven't had time to produce any useful debugging information, so

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:33:36 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 26 19:00:10 PDT 2002 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/bin/cvs: Shared object has no run-time symbol table I got this testing the RMEM_LIMIT patches, but it only crops up after about an hour of heavy ports

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-27 Thread Matthew Dillon
It would be great if you guys could re-test with the pmap fix (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c r1.326). I believe that the pmap bug was to blame for all of these issues but I need verification before I have the comfort level necessary to do the MFC I intended to do.

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-27 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: It would be great if you guys could re-test with the pmap fix (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c r1.326). I believe that the pmap bug was to blame for all of these issues but I need verification before I have the

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-22 Thread W Gerald Hicks
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, at 06:32 AM, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is caused by an old bogus include path in Makefiles (still needed :-(), a bogus #include in drm and new newspace pollution in sys/select.h. drm includes sys/select.h, although this

Re: libpcap vs. up-to-date net/bpf.h Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bill Fenner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And the answer is... it only uses the includes if you commit them to the FreeBSD repository instead of your local repository. *laugh* Thanks for fixing it so quickly! DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

libpcap vs. up-to-date net/bpf.h Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Fenner
Ok, so I broke world. What I don't get is how -- why doesn't the build use the up to date includes? Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: libpcap vs. up-to-date net/bpf.h Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-20 Thread Bill Fenner
And the answer is... it only uses the includes if you commit them to the FreeBSD repository instead of your local repository. Pointy hat to: fenner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-16 Thread Bruce Evans
This is caused by an old bogus include path in Makefiles (still needed :-(), a bogus #include in drm and new newspace pollution in sys/select.h. drm includes sys/select.h, although this header is essentially user-only. sys/select.h now includes signal.h. signal.h declares psignal(3) which is

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is caused by an old bogus include path in Makefiles (still needed :-(), a bogus #include in drm and new newspace pollution in sys/select.h. drm includes sys/select.h, although this header is essentially user-only. sys/select.h now includes

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm doing the daily (-j8) snapshots on a 2-CPU SMP machine for i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64, and never saw this problem. Could it be that you have a faulty hardware on your tinderbox, as I already saw a few reports from you, always in a

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-03 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:53:17PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm doing the daily (-j8) snapshots on a 2-CPU SMP machine for i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64, and never saw this problem. Could it be that you have a faulty hardware on your

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-03 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm doing the daily (-j8) snapshots on a 2-CPU SMP machine for i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64, and never saw this problem. Could it be that you have a faulty hardware on your tinderbox, as I already saw a few

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-06-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The single biggest problem seemed to be NFS, but you're not using that anymore are you? I do, the sources are on NFS, but the obj dir is in /tmp. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-28 Thread Peter Wemm
This is a bogon specific to ref5 where I removed the old c++ stuff. I'll fix this on ref5 in a moment. To build libstdc++ manually for folks that have never had one before (or did the same sort of brutal cleanup I did) can fairly easily build one like this: cd src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ make obj

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-27 Thread Andrea Campi
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 23:32 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Is this the moment where src/usr.bin/perl should be mailwrapper like? Instead of searching the interpreter in some uncertain location (and failing) shouldn't the program

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: perl: Perl is not installed, try 'pkg_add -r perl' Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH for many system tools (eg: pkg_add -r). Cheers, -Peter -- Peter

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: perl: Perl is not installed, try 'pkg_add -r perl' To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Perl not being installed also looks like a success... ;^). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH for many system tools (eg: pkg_add -r). How about this: Index: perl.c

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH for many system tools (eg: pkg_add -r). How about this: Index: perl.c

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH for many

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-25 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 23:32 -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: perl: Perl is not installed, try 'pkg_add -r perl' Indeed it is installed. Note that you have exposed a fundamental bug in the perl wrapper. It only searches $PATH, and /usr/local/bin is not in $PATH for

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Apparently an eternal pessimist, you were not expecting success? 8-) 8-) 8-). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Erm, this is the second blank message. Is this really a success and not a failure? If so, can we not have a mail sent out for successful builds? :) It's a failure, but ref5 doesn't have Perl installed, so the script that selects what portions of the

RE: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-21 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-May-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Erm, this is the second blank message. Is this really a success and not a failure? If so, can we not have a mail sent out for successful

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-21 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 22), John Baldwin said: On 22-May-2002 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message Erm, this is the second blank message. Is this really a success and not a failure?

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-20 Thread Peter Wemm
This was probably just a lost race with 'make world'. Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-09 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 07:48:47PM -0700, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: ... /d/home/des/tinderbox/src/kerberos5/lib/libkrb5/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/acl.c:77: warning: implicit declaration of function `__va_size' fixed. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-28 Thread Hiten Pandya
%%% : iedowse 2002/04/28 03:24:38 PDT : : Modified files: :usr.sbin/pstat pstat.8 pstat.c : Log: : Oops, remove references to NLOCKED and NWANTED, now that they no : longer exist. %%% I beleive this unbreaks pstat. :-) -- Hiten

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Allerede fixet. In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: === nge === nmdm === ntfs === nullfs === pcn === plip === portalfs === ppbus === ppi === pps === procfs === pseudofs === random === rl === rp === sf === sis === sk === sn === snp === sound === sound/pcm === sound/driver

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:58:11AM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: === xe ./aicasm: 866 instructions used /d/home/des/tinderbox/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c:67: netinet/if_fddi.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Are you using -j(1) ? To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:58:11AM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: === xe ./aicasm: 866 instructions used /d/home/des/tinderbox/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c:67: netinet/if_fddi.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-06 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: /d/home/des/tinderbox/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c:67: netinet/if_fddi.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed This should be fixed already. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:58:11AM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: === xe ./aicasm: 866 instructions used /d/home/des/tinderbox/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c:67: netinet/if_fddi.h:

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you using -j(1) ? No. Try s;netinet/if_fddi;net/if_fddi; in nd6.c. The why is `aicasm' being used in the if_xe.ko build? It isn't.