Please commit (Approved by: portmgr(bapt)) if needed
regards,
Bapt
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to
Hi all
Does anybody please commit the patch? My FreeBSD machine is down due to power
outage
for next week. Also I'll be very busy in the next week.
Best,
Nakata Maho
From: Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Date: Thu, 12 Dec
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
I see the octave port is still broken.
After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports,
reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports,
I'm see the original problem.
% octave
Segmentation fault (core
On 12/13/2013 14:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
I see the octave port is still broken.
After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports,
reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports,
I'm see the original
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:19 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/13/2013 14:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
I see the octave port is still broken.
After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports,
reverting my local chnages
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:47:23PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
I see the octave port is still broken.
After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports,
reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports,
Many thanks!
From: Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:47:23 +0100
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
I see the octave port is still broken.
After a clean install on my self, removing all
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
anything new? Having build the port
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
anything new? Having build the
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you
On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10,
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:37:34 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
The tests were successful:
On 12/04/2013 00:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:37:34 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/03/2013 21:54, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
The tests were successful:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard
options, octave is segfaulting for
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 11/14/2013 15:45, Steve Kargl wrote:
And in practice, it is broken.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-November/046565.html
QED
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave.
On 11/14/2013 15:45, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:54:52AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On the other hand, different C++ standard libraries simply cannot be
mixed. The internal implementations are usually
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard
options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with:
env
Hmm thanks for discussion.
I'll install and test FBSD 10 in this weekend.
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Subject: Re: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:43:02 -0800
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Jan
On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On the other hand, different C++ standard libraries simply cannot be
mixed. The internal implementations are usually completely different.
This is not really news at all, certainly not to the ports people. :-)
That said, it
Am 14.11.2013 10:54 (UTC+1) schrieb David Chisnall:
On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On the other hand, different C++ standard libraries simply cannot be
mixed. The internal implementations are usually completely different.
This is not really news at all,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:54:52AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On the other hand, different C++ standard libraries simply cannot be
mixed. The internal implementations are usually completely different.
This is not really
https://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC++Stack says things about linking against
both libc++ and libstdc++ , do they still apply?
Best regards
Andreas
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Marcus von Appen m...@freebsd.org wrote:
This brings up another point into which I am running with the previously
discussed blender issue.
Let's assume port A_defcompiler does not specify a compiler and c++ lib, it
will default to libc++ and clang++ on 10.x
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:52:16PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Marcus von Appen m...@freebsd.org wrote:
This brings up another point into which I am running with the previously
discussed blender issue.
Let's assume port A_defcompiler does not specify a
on 13/11/2013 19:52 Ryan Stone said the following:
In my experience libstdc++ does not have good ABI stability between versions
In my experience it does.
In either case compatibility between different versions of relatively modern
libstdc++ version is no doubt much better than between libstdc++
On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:51, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 13/11/2013 19:52 Ryan Stone said the following:
In my experience libstdc++ does not have good ABI stability between versions
In my experience it does.
In either case compatibility between different versions of relatively
27 matches
Mail list logo
