On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:39:44PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > --On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 03:59:24 -0500 Larry Rosenman
> > >> Ok, with today's sources, I still get a page not present panic for
> > >> address (0x7) on transistion to battery.
> > >
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 15:39:44 -0700 Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> --On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 03:59:24 -0500 Larry Rosenman
>> Ok, with today's sources, I still get a page not present panic for
>> address (0x7) on transistion to bat
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > --On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 03:59:24 -0500 Larry Rosenman
> >> Ok, with today's sources, I still get a page not present panic for
> >> address (0x7) on transistion to battery.
> > as a followup, with this code, I no longer get the panic at ACPI
> > sh
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:02:19 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 03:59:24 -0500 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, with today's sources, I still get a page not present panic for
address (0x7) on transistion to battery.
as a followu
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 03:59:24 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ok, with today's sources, I still get a page not present panic for
address (0x7) on transistion to battery.
as a followup, with this code, I no longer get the panic at ACPI shutdown,
just some messages about
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 14:15:48 -0700 Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
If this is the same patch I applied, it makes my situation WORSE, as the
ACPI detach code panics now as well as Battery ops, and transition to
Battery.
I posted this info ~
