Re: cvsup overzealous

2000-08-13 Thread Mark Knight
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> With world and kernel of 10th August, 01:00 GMT cvsup is reporting >> 'SetAttrs' adjustments for every file it encounters on repeated runs >> against a server that has not been updated. >> >> Running under an old kernel, c

Re: cvsup overzealous

2000-08-12 Thread Brian Somers
> With world and kernel of 10th August, 01:00 GMT cvsup is reporting > 'SetAttrs' adjustments for every file it encounters on repeated runs > against a server that has not been updated. > > Running under an old kernel, cvsup is not performing any updates. This isn't by any chance because you cvs

Re: -current kernel causes CVSup SetAttrs flood (was: cvsup overzealous)

2000-08-12 Thread Mark Knight
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >[I changed the subject to something more represenative.] > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Mark Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> With world and kernel of 10th August, 01:00 GMT cvsup is reporting >> 'SetAttrs' adjustme

Re: -current kernel causes CVSup SetAttrs flood (was: cvsup overzealous)

2000-08-11 Thread John Polstra
[I changed the subject to something more represenative.] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With world and kernel of 10th August, 01:00 GMT cvsup is reporting > 'SetAttrs' adjustments for every file it encounters on repeated runs > against a server that has

cvsup overzealous

2000-08-11 Thread Mark Knight
With world and kernel of 10th August, 01:00 GMT cvsup is reporting 'SetAttrs' adjustments for every file it encounters on repeated runs against a server that has not been updated. Running under an old kernel, cvsup is not performing any updates. -- Mark Knight PGP Public Ke