On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
quad.h contains:
---snip---
/*
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
* both compilers.
*/
#if
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
quad.h contains:
---snip---
/*
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
* both compilers.
*/
#if __GNUC__ = 2
typedef
On 10 Apr, Bruce Evans wrote:
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
* both compilers.
Is this still valid? Does someone really use gcc 1 to compile FreeBSD?
This
On 10 Apr, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
quad.h contains:
---snip---
/*
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
As for other occourences of the use of __GNUC__ without a check if it is
defined: I will wrap them as soon as I review my own patches again.
Other occurrences are mostly correct. __GNUC__ is 0 in cpp expressions
if it is used without it being
Hi,
quad.h contains:
---snip---
/*
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
* both compilers.
*/
#if __GNUC__ = 2
typedef unsigned intqshift_t;
#else
typedef u_quad_t
