÷ Wed, 22.05.2002, × 23:21, Mattias Pantzare ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
Terry, FreeBSD has no support for BGP. To get BGP support you install a
router daemon. That inserts routes in the routing table in the kernel. The
kernel will do all packet forwarding. The kernel has to support two or
more routes to the
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
÷ Wed, 22.05.2002, × 23:21, Mattias Pantzare ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
Terry, FreeBSD has no support for BGP. To get BGP support you install a
router daemon. That inserts routes in the routing table in the kernel. The
kernel will do all packet forwarding. The kernel has to
В Thu, 23.05.2002, в 11:17, Terry Lambert написал:
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
÷ Wed, 22.05.2002, × 23:21, Mattias Pantzare ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
Terry, FreeBSD has no support for BGP. To get BGP support you install a
router daemon. That inserts routes in the routing table in the kernel. The
÷ Wed, 22.05.2002, × 00:52, Terry Lambert ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
Multipath routing is not as useful as you imply. Neither is
round-robin'ing between a set of paths. It assumes that the
pool retention time on the router is longer than the drain time
for a single
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
Without the cooperation of the tother end, you don't have
control of the symmetry of the return route. So maybe
your packets are round-robin'ed out interfaces, but they
all come back through the same interface, because you have
no control of the other
Terry, FreeBSD has no support for BGP. To get BGP support you install a
router daemon. That inserts routes in the routing table in the kernel. The
kernel will do all packet forwarding. The kernel has to support two or
more routes to the same destination if you are going to do BGP (or OSPF)
÷ Tue, 21.05.2002, × 09:37, Terry Lambert ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
Oleg Chebotarev wrote:
Does anyone know when FreeBSD will
support multiple default routes
or multiple routes to the same network thru different interfaces?
I have two default routes. One is IP address A. The other is
IP address B.
Howdy,
-Original Message-
From: Vladimir B. Grebenschikov
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May 2002 17:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Oleg Chebotarev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: multi default routes in freebsd !?
[snip]
Times ago there was hack for multipath routing on:
ftp
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
There are some algoritms, for example round-robin
It is not a problem if you assign two equal routes you know what you
want.
If you have two links to one provider and want to balance outgoing
traffic it is much better to do it with to similar routes.
÷ Tue, 21.05.2002, × 13:13, Terry Lambert ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
OSPF have equal cost multupath, An BGP too (If I not mistaken)
so lack of kernel support of more then one route for one destination
is not good.
Zebra on Linux can do OSPF equal cost multipath but on FreeBSD cant.
Sounds like a
The mpath diff is against 4.3 stable on given date.
I was not even able to patch 4.3 release.
OSPF and BGP does not came into play here yet,
because to assign the same/different costs to different routes to the
same destination I need to have routing table with 2 (or more) routes
to the same
÷ Tue, 21.05.2002, × 15:54, Oleg Chebotarev ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
The mpath diff is against 4.3 stable on given date.
I was not even able to patch 4.3 release.
OSPF and BGP does not came into play here yet,
because to assign the same/different costs to different routes to the
same destination I need to
The thing is that it does not work with 4.3 release.
I tried it a few times and I saw a lot of error during patching.
Does anyone knows how to get a 4.3 stable for a given date?
--- Vladimir B. Grebenschikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
÷ Tue, 21.05.2002, × 15:54, Oleg Chebotarev ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
The
BGP is a better idea (of course).
You might also consider using BGP.
And have I mentioned BGP? 8-) 8-).
Whether to use BGP/OSPF is orthogonal to multipath use. Both
OSPF and BGP allow you to install multiple next hops. Adding
multipath support requires, at a minimum, changing struct
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
Multipath routing is not as useful as you imply. Neither is
round-robin'ing between a set of paths. It assumes that the
pool retention time on the router is longer than the drain time
for a single path, such that you end up with a higher aggregate
Oleg Chebotarev wrote:
The mpath diff is against 4.3 stable on given date.
I was not even able to patch 4.3 release.
It is absolutely trivial to bring the patch up to date against
-stable. Bringing patches up to date against -current is a
useless exercise (IMO), unless they will be integrated
Oleg Chebotarev wrote:
The thing is that it does not work with 4.3 release.
I tried it a few times and I saw a lot of error during patching.
Does anyone knows how to get a 4.3 stable for a given date?
man cvs
You can checkout a source tree of a given date.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send
Does anyone know when FreeBSD will
support multiple default routes
or multiple routes to the same network thru different interfaces?
Thank you,
Oleg
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe:
Oleg Chebotarev wrote:
Does anyone know when FreeBSD will
support multiple default routes
or multiple routes to the same network thru different interfaces?
I have two default routes. One is IP address A. The other is
IP address B.
To which IP address do I forward a random packet?
19 matches
Mail list logo
