On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:36:36PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> That's ok. I seem to have goofed up in kern_sig.c. Please try the (untested)
> patch at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/kern_sig.patch.
Well, the kernel is ready and the patch appears to work. Ie I can run a
large dirlisting on
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:36:36PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> That's ok. I seem to have goofed up in kern_sig.c. Please try the (untested)
> patch at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/kern_sig.patch.
OK, trying it right now... it applied cleanly, but it will take sometime
until the compile
On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:23:58PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 30-Dec-00 Michael
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:23:58PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
> >> > panic: lockable mtx_e
On 30-Dec-00 Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
>> > panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
>> > ../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
>> &g
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
> > panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
> > ../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
> >
> > which is
> >
> > mtx_enter(lkp->lk_in
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 11:46:15AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> A checkin was just made that fixed a mutex that was being held incorrectly
> in psignal, which features in your stack trace.
>
> It's possible that this has been fixed in the last 24 hours.
Hello Julian!
If you are referring to
On 30-Dec-00 Michael Harnois wrote:
> panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
> ../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
>
> which is
>
> mtx_enter(lkp->lk_interlock, MTX_DEF);
We need to know where interrupts were disabled (since that is what makes the
bloc
:
> > panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
>../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
>
> Hello!
>
> OK, so since nobody has done it before me, I just decided to investigate a
> bit. Remember, that I am not a kernel hacker, so I might be completely
> off-base
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:41:08AM -0600, Michael Harnois wrote:
> panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
>../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
Hello!
OK, so since nobody has done it before me, I just decided to investigate a
bit. Remember, that I am not a kernel hacker
panic: lockable mtx_enter() of lockmgr interlock when not legal @
../../kern/kern_lock.c: 247
which is
mtx_enter(lkp->lk_interlock, MTX_DEF);
my system is an i386 UP with two dc cards and a kernel configured as
follows:
machine i386
cpu I586_CPU
cpu I686_
11 matches
Mail list logo
