On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:13:15PM -0700, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:55:18PM +0300, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
This isn't a yesterdays problem, I've had this for a month or so.
The problem is explicit declaration of -march=p[234], use
CPUTYPE=i686 in
I have built XFree86 at least 3 times in the past week, all with varying
levels of optimization, from -O to -O3 and ALWAYS with -march=pentium3.
All of the builds succeeded, although I had stability problems with -O2
and above. Are you _certain_ this is a compiler bug?
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:47:44AM -0400, Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have built XFree86 at least 3 times in the past week, all with varying
levels of optimization, from -O to -O3 and ALWAYS with -march=pentium3.
All of the builds succeeded, although I had stability problems with
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:22:36 +0300
Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:47:44AM -0400, Wesley Morgan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have built XFree86 at least 3 times in the past week, all with
varying levels of optimization, from -O to -O3 and ALWAYS with
Current as of yesterday
[daver@metropolis:/usr/ports/sysutils/xmbmon]$ uname -a
FreeBSD metropolis.gomerbud.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Sun Sep 22
10:42:53 PDT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/METROPOLIS
i386
The XFree86 server build dies with an odd compiler
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:08:02AM -0700, David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Current as of yesterday
[daver@metropolis:/usr/ports/sysutils/xmbmon]$ uname -a
FreeBSD metropolis.gomerbud.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Sun Sep 22
10:42:53 PDT 2002 [EMAIL
On 2002-09-23 13:55, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:08:02AM -0700, David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Current as of yesterday
The XFree86 server build dies with an odd compiler message. I have no clue
what it means.
[snip]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:31:38PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
This isn't a yesterdays problem, I've had this for a month or so.
The problem is explicit declaration of -march=p[234], use
CPUTYPE=i686 in /etc/make.conf and you get further. The second way
is to
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:54:25 +0300
Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, this sounds like a joke.. because I have written at least three
messages to -current list about the very same thing. I know that
following -current list for day-to-day basis is challenge, but
nevertheless this
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:08:13AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, this sounds like a joke.. because I have written at least three
messages to -current list about the very same thing. I know that
following -current list for day-to-day basis is challenge, but
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:55:18PM +0300, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
This isn't a yesterdays problem, I've had this for a month or so.
The problem is explicit declaration of -march=p[234], use
CPUTYPE=i686 in /etc/make.conf and you get further. The second way
is to not set CPUTYPE at all, logic
11 matches
Mail list logo
