Hi.
I ported SONIC ethernet driver into FreeBSD from NetBSD/pc98.
The original driver (named 'sn') on NetBSD/pc98 is
for several NEC C-bus(alike ISA) and PCMCIA card.
There is already 'sn' driver on FreeBSD for SMC 9xxx series ethernet,
so I renamed to 'snc' after "SONIC".
Is there any object
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote:
> And I wonder, Is there any ISA card using this chip?
Dunno, but I've got some EISA boards that use it.
> For both 5-current and 4-stable source codes (beta quality) are:
>
> http://triaez.kaisei.org/~mzaki/sonic/
I'll take a look.
Thanks, a SON
Ted Sikora wrote:
> Your right the addresses seem to be standard machine resources. Are you
> using SMP? The irq's are remapped on a SMP machine so maybe that's were
> the trouble lies? The PNP tag is what has me stumped. I replaced the isa
> cards with pci this evening out of curiosity...same
$BFMA3%a!<%k$rAw$i$;$FD:$$$?$3$H$r?<$/$*OM$S$$$?$7$^$9!#(B$B6=L#$N$J$$J}$O$*5v$7$/$@$5$$!#$3$N$^$^:o=|$7$F$/$@$5$$!#(B$B$?$$$X$s?=$7Lu$4$6$$$^$;$s$G$7$?!#(B$B!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a(B$B7n<}#1#2#0#0K|1_$N2DG=@-$b$"$k%S%C%0$J>pJs$r$*EA$($7$^$9!#(B
$B
Trent Nelson wrote:
>
> Ted Sikora wrote:
>
> > Your right the addresses seem to be standard machine resources. Are you
> > using SMP? The irq's are remapped on a SMP machine so maybe that's were
> > the trouble lies? The PNP tag is what has me stumped. I replaced the isa
> > cards with pci this
> > Could someone please either take a look at this, or give an
> > authoritative comment as to why it's happening.
This is the ISA PnP code reporting devices enumerated via the PnP BIOS.
At the moment, our support code isn't smart enough to use either the PnP
interface or the resource
I was recently struck by this problem:
Machine running 3.4-STABLE has multiple IP addresses on each
of two network interfaces.
IP addresses on network interfaces are exchanged for debugging. (de0
gets the IP addresses that de1 had, and vice versa). Machine is
rebooted.
Conne
I noticed that a newer version of binutils is in the source code tree
(2.91). Is there anything that needs to be set during the make world
to make 2.91 the default binutils?
- Donn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Matthew Dillon writes:
>:Thanks, but there is code in rl_rxeof() to align to a 32 bit boundary.
>:If that weren't the case than I would expect the Alpha to panic with
>:other IP applications, not just NFS.
>:
>:I don't know, NFS must be doing something weird.
>:
>:---
>:Gary Jennejohn / [EMAIL PRO
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Gary Jennejohn
had to walk into mine and say:
> OK. Unfortunately, gdb core dumps when I try to analyze a crash dump
> with a debugging kernel :( Even worse, gdb core dumps when I try to
> run a debugging gdb in gdb to find out why gdb is
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 03:18:38PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> I noticed that a newer version of binutils is in the source code tree
> (2.91). Is there anything that needs to be set during the make world
> to make 2.91 the default binutils?
Uh... that would be 2.9.1 which is the version that is
11 matches
Mail list logo
