NS DP83932 SONIC driver

2000-05-04 Thread Motomichi Matsuzaki
Hi. I ported SONIC ethernet driver into FreeBSD from NetBSD/pc98. The original driver (named 'sn') on NetBSD/pc98 is for several NEC C-bus(alike ISA) and PCMCIA card. There is already 'sn' driver on FreeBSD for SMC 9xxx series ethernet, so I renamed to 'snc' after "SONIC". Is there any object

Re: NS DP83932 SONIC driver

2000-05-04 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote: > And I wonder, Is there any ISA card using this chip? Dunno, but I've got some EISA boards that use it. > For both 5-current and 4-stable source codes (beta quality) are: > > http://triaez.kaisei.org/~mzaki/sonic/ I'll take a look. Thanks, a SON

Re: can't assign resources

2000-05-04 Thread Trent Nelson
Ted Sikora wrote: > Your right the addresses seem to be standard machine resources. Are you > using SMP? The irq's are remapped on a SMP machine so maybe that's were > the trouble lies? The PNP tag is what has me stumped. I replaced the isa > cards with pci this evening out of curiosity...same

$B2>EPO?$O#57n#1#5F|$^$G!*:#$J$iA@$($k(B$B7n<}#1#2#0#0K|!*(B

2000-05-04 Thread MNAYURI
$BFMA3%a!<%k$rAw$i$;$FD:$$$?$3$H$r?<$/$*OM$S$$$?$7$^$9!#(B$B6=L#$N$J$$J}$O$*5v$7$/$@$5$$!#$3$N$^$^:o=|$7$F$/$@$5$$!#(B$B$?$$$X$s?=$7Lu$4$6$$$^$;$s$G$7$?!#(B$B!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a!a(B$B7n<}#1#2#0#0K|1_$N2DG=@-$b$"$k%S%C%0$J>pJs$r$*EA$($7$^$9!#(B   $B

Re: can't assign resources

2000-05-04 Thread Ted Sikora
Trent Nelson wrote: > > Ted Sikora wrote: > > > Your right the addresses seem to be standard machine resources. Are you > > using SMP? The irq's are remapped on a SMP machine so maybe that's were > > the trouble lies? The PNP tag is what has me stumped. I replaced the isa > > cards with pci this

Re: can't assign resources

2000-05-04 Thread Mike Smith
> > Could someone please either take a look at this, or give an > > authoritative comment as to why it's happening. This is the ISA PnP code reporting devices enumerated via the PnP BIOS. At the moment, our support code isn't smart enough to use either the PnP interface or the resource

gratuituous arp for multiple IP addresses

2000-05-04 Thread Rahul Dhesi
I was recently struck by this problem: Machine running 3.4-STABLE has multiple IP addresses on each of two network interfaces. IP addresses on network interfaces are exchanged for debugging. (de0 gets the IP addresses that de1 had, and vice versa). Machine is rebooted. Conne

the newer binutils

2000-05-04 Thread Donn Miller
I noticed that a newer version of binutils is in the source code tree (2.91). Is there anything that needs to be set during the make world to make 2.91 the default binutils? - Donn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-04 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Matthew Dillon writes: >:Thanks, but there is code in rl_rxeof() to align to a 32 bit boundary. >:If that weren't the case than I would expect the Alpha to panic with >:other IP applications, not just NFS. >: >:I don't know, NFS must be doing something weird. >: >:--- >:Gary Jennejohn / [EMAIL PRO

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-04 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Gary Jennejohn had to walk into mine and say: > OK. Unfortunately, gdb core dumps when I try to analyze a crash dump > with a debugging kernel :( Even worse, gdb core dumps when I try to > run a debugging gdb in gdb to find out why gdb is

Re: the newer binutils

2000-05-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 03:18:38PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote: > I noticed that a newer version of binutils is in the source code tree > (2.91). Is there anything that needs to be set during the make world > to make 2.91 the default binutils? Uh... that would be 2.9.1 which is the version that is