Looking for the contract or permanent IT staff? We can recruit
Russian IT professionals for you? Have a look at www.ricsltd.co.uk. We have a lot
to offer!
You will be impressed with our services, low fees as well as quality of
programmers.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to conta
> >On i386, 'gcc -fsyntax-only -Wall x.c' produces no error. On
> >NetBSD/alpha (same compiler, really), this produces:
> >
> >x.c: In function `func':
> >x.c:4: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
> >
> >It'd be *really* nice if we could add a flag where such errors could be
At 4:37 PM +1000 7/6/01, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>Another random thought: If it was easier to build/install a
>cross-platform version of gcc, it might be easier to convince
>developers to at least check that compiling on different platforms
>works before committing.
Peter,
I had the same idea last n
Yes!
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Mark Peek wrote:
> At 4:37 PM +1000 7/6/01, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >Another random thought: If it was easier to build/install a
> >cross-platform version of gcc, it might be easier to convince
> >developers to at least check that compiling on different platforms
> >wor
In the freebsd-current mailing list there is a debate raging under
"chgrp broken on alpha systems", which is much larger than the minute
little chgrp command. It also strikes me as something larger than
freebsd-current. Let me continue my trend of being an idiot by
claiming it is a "freebsd deve
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mount: /dev/fd0c: No such file or directory
> It seems there is some type of race to get the fd0c symlink in place
> and I am not winning it.
The symlink DEVFS nodes are going to be created first time they
are referenced. Your mount attempt thus
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ..., I saw a message saying that Vinum was
>> not yet ready for use with DEVFS. Is that still the case?
> I fixed that. :) Let me and Grog know if you have problems.
It basically works for me. Of course, vinum still has a dozen
of bugs that get u
I'm *sure* I'm doing something wrong here, but I can't figure it out.
I am using cvsup to keep a -current cvs tree on my system. According to
the web access cvs tree, a file I am looking at should be version 1.16.
When I try
cvs -R co -f src/sys/dev/ppbus/immio.c
I get version 1.15. When I l
On 06-Jul-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
>>
>> Jason Evans wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:16:16PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> [...]
>> > I think there is a clear argument for #1 to be "struct proc". I don't
>> > much
>> > care what #2, #3, and #4 are called.
>> >
>> >
>Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:52:05 +0100
>From: j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I'm *sure* I'm doing something wrong here, but I can't figure it out.
>I am using cvsup to keep a -current cvs tree on my system. According to
>the web access cvs tree, a file I am looking at should be version 1.16.
>
that reminds me..
The reason I want to work out the names now is because I have a system up
and running with the process structure split into these pieces and I wan
teh names finalised before I take the next step which involves editing
almost every kernel file.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM
On 06-Jul-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
>>
>> Jason Evans wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:16:16PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> [...]
>> > I think there is a clear argument for #1 to be "struct proc". I don't
>> > much
>> > care what #2, #3, and #4 are called.
>> >
>> >
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > my favourites are:
> > proc, subproc, lwcpu, lwp
> >
> > lwps are parcelled out to lwcpus to run when the appropriate subproc is
> > scheduled.
>
> One other note. #2 is conceptually a related group of #4's, so I think it's
> name should refle
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 09:33:27PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 10:54 -0700, matt wrote:
> >
> > I don't think ipf is complete in its ipv6 support yet.You can
> > use ipfw instead.
>
> Ipf has been supporting IPv6 for quite some time. It's just that
> one has to enable
On 07-Jul-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
> that reminds me..
>
> The reason I want to work out the names now is because I have a system up
> and running with the process structure split into these pieces and I wan
> teh names finalised before I take the next step which involves editing
> almost every
On 07-Jul-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> >
>> > my favourites are:
>> > proc, subproc, lwcpu, lwp
>> >
>> > lwps are parcelled out to lwcpus to run when the appropriate subproc is
>> > scheduled.
>>
>> One other note. #2 is conceptually a relat
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >When I try
>
> >cvs -R co -f src/sys/dev/ppbus/immio.c
>
> >I get version 1.15. When I look at the .c,v file in the cvs tree, it says
> >HEAD is 1.16, but $Id says it is 1.15.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> > One other note. #2 is conceptually a related group of #4's, so I think it's
> > name should reflect that. (It's view as a group of #4's is more important than
> > as being a part of #1.) So, if you go with
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
->proc->
> ->thrgrp->
> ->thr->
> ->thrctx->
>
interesting, though the thrctx maps most closely to a userland thread.
there may be many threads running on each #3.
> --
> Dan Eischen
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >
> ->proc->
> > ->thrgrp->
> > ->thr->
> > ->thrctx->
> >
> interesting, though the thrctx maps most closely to a userland thread.
> there may be many threads running on each #3.
IMHO, I like this less than ks
>Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:35:46 -0600
>From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I saw something similar at usenix with my old, hacked kernel config
>file, but not with GENERIC that I just booted.
Well, I appreciate that hint... so I looked for differences between
GENERIC and my kernel config (LAP
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > >
> > ->proc->
> > > ->thrgrp->
> > > ->thr->
> > > ->thrctx->
> > >
> > interesting, though the thrctx maps most closely to a userland thread.
> > there may be ma
Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Julian Elischer wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > >
> > > ->proc->
> > > > ->thrgrp->
> > > > ->thr->
> > > > ->thrctx->
> > > >
> > > interesting, though the thrctx maps most clos
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:52:06AM -0500, a little birdie told me
that Dan Nelson remarked
> In the last episode (Jul 06), David Scheidt said:
> >
> > I've dodged that problem by SIGSTOPing installworld a couple times during
> > the /sbin install, waiting for softupdates to catchup, and then SIGC
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> People are making more and more mistakes that break the Alpha build.
> We will soon have two more arches.
...which won't really make much difference, as 99% of the difference
in userland code is integer and pointer sizes, so for all practical
purposes
25 matches
Mail list logo
