Re: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

2003-01-23 Thread Peter Kostouros
Hi I recompiled the official nv driver with debugging symbols: X works as expected. My apologies if I alarmed anyone. John Baldwin wrote: On 22-Jan-2003 Peter Kostouros wrote: Hi I am having a similar problem to what has been reported previously regarding X. Basically I get a fatal trap

buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0

2003-01-23 Thread Evan Dower
I'm trying to upgrade from -stable to 5, but the build failed at rtld-elf. One error and a whole lot of warnings. I don't know where I should start as I'm new to current (even though it's technically not -current). I swear I followed the instructions in UPGRADING. Any help would be greatly

[PATCH]: newfs(8) FS_OPTSPACE vs FS_OPTTIME bug

2003-01-23 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hello, newfs(8) incorrectly claims that FS_OPTTIME is unavailable when minfree is less than MINFREE. MINFREE is defined in ufs/ffs/fs.h: #define MINFREE 8 But relevant code in ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c uses hardcoded value: 288 if (fs-fs_minfree = 5 || 289 fs-fs_cstotal.cs_nffree 290

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 08:12:12PM -0600, Ben Hockenhull wrote: I recently installed 5.0-RELEASE on a Sony Vaio R505EC laptop and it's working pretty well, save for the fact that i can run X because my touchpad isn't found upon boot probe. It used to be /dev/psm0 under 4.x-STABLE. I

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:13:51PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: v03102806ba54ff70ac3e@[192.168.10.2] Ben Hockenhull [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I recently installed 5.0-RELEASE on a Sony Vaio R505EC laptop and it's : working pretty well, save for the fact that i can run

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Ben Hockenhull
At 10:13 PM -0700 1/22/03, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: v03102806ba54ff70ac3e@[192.168.10.2] Ben Hockenhull [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I recently installed 5.0-RELEASE on a Sony Vaio R505EC laptop and it's : working pretty well, save for the fact that i can run X because my

Re: aout support not working on todays -current

2003-01-23 Thread Bob Willcox
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:25:16PM -0800, joseph wrote: Hi Bob, Go into your kernel of choice and build it with the following: options COMPAT_AOUT now to enable AOUT binaries from the kernel loader. Make and Install and reboot the about new kerenl and aout will now work for you. :)

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Ben Hockenhull
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 08:12:12PM -0600, Ben Hockenhull wrote: I recently installed 5.0-RELEASE on a Sony Vaio R505EC laptop and it's working pretty well, save for the fact that i can run X because my touchpad isn't found upon boot probe. It used to be /dev/psm0 under 4.x-STABLE. I

Another of my mailservers is being blocked by freebsd.org

2003-01-23 Thread Hunter Peress
Hi, I've been having to use this yahoo account because my normal email server *seems* to be blocked by freebsd.org: This has been going on for days now: The original message was received at Tue, 21 Jan 2003 03:52:39 -0500 (EST) from cs2417534-45.austin.rr.com [24.175.34.45] - The

Re: Another of my mailservers is being blocked by freebsd.org

2003-01-23 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Hunter Peress wrote: Hi, I've been having to use this yahoo account because my normal email server *seems* to be blocked by freebsd.org: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 450 txsmtp01.texas.rr.com: Helo

Re: Another of my mailservers is being blocked by freebsd.org

2003-01-23 Thread Mike Knell
Hunter Peress wrote: Hi, I've been having to use this yahoo account because my normal email server *seems* to be blocked by freebsd.org: This has been going on for days now: The original message was received at Tue, 21 Jan 2003 03:52:39 -0500 (EST) from cs2417534-45.austin.rr.com

stand/sysinstall changes?

2003-01-23 Thread Elden Fenison
According to the handbook's instructions, back on 4.7 I used to always do the following as part of my installworld: cd /usr/src/release/sysinstall make all install This apparently updates the sysinstall stuff. With 5.0, I don't seem to have that directory any more. What happened to it?... is it

help: can't boot 5.0 diskless

2003-01-23 Thread Dong Lin
Hi, I have been running etherboot/diskless machines successfully with several 4.x releases. Now I have trouble bringing up 5.0 diskless x86 machines. The same dhcp/nfs/etherboot setup works for 4.x. But the 5.0 kernel freezes and eventually crashes without printing anything on the console. I am

Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Atte Peltomaki
I've used 5.0-RELEASE for few days now, and I've been experiencing some serious performance problems. I haven't had the time to examine it more closely, and frankly, I have no clue where to start looking for. Perhaps someone knows what this is all about. Description: Every time machine is under

Time keeping problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Patrick Hartling
I just updated a 4.7-STABLE system (last rebuilt using sources from Jan 7, 2003) to 5.0-RELEASE, and now the system clock is going nuts. I had the same problem when I updated from 3-STABLE to 4-STABLE quite a while back. To solve the problem then, I added the following to my kernel configuration

make release of FreeBSD-CURRENT on FreeBSD-STABLE

2003-01-23 Thread Andrey Elperin
Hi! I trying to make release of CURRENT on 4.7-RELEASE-p3 box. To do that I use 4.7 source tree in /usr/src and /usr/src/release/Makefile from CURRENT branch. In a first half of January all worked fine, but approx. after January, 15, every make release fail with similiar messages in log

Re: I want a sysctl kern.allow_shooting_into_my_foot!

2003-01-23 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Joerg Wunsch wrote: Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can turn this debugging off from userland with: sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=0 Why not make it a loader tunable? Why should it? It's a debugging flag, so it's IMHO sufficient that it can be set from DDB (that's what i

Re: buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0

2003-01-23 Thread Evan Dower
An update: CVSup'ing didn't fix the problem, but when I deleted the rtld.c and mv'd /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.hide, it stopped at /usr/src/contrib/amd/amd/srvr_nfs.c. So, I deleted that file, CVSup'd, and built again, and everything built fine. Very strange... cvsweb doesn't show any

Re: stand/sysinstall changes?

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:04:30AM -0800, Elden Fenison wrote: According to the handbook's instructions, back on 4.7 I used to always do the following as part of my installworld: cd /usr/src/release/sysinstall make all install This apparently updates the sysinstall stuff.

Re: stand/sysinstall changes?

2003-01-23 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Elden Fenison wrote: According to the handbook's instructions, back on 4.7 I used to always do the following as part of my installworld: cd /usr/src/release/sysinstall make all install This apparently updates the sysinstall stuff. With 5.0, I don't seem to have that directory any more. What

Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Kenneth Culver
I hope someone could bring light to what's going on. Alltho I'm not whining, I knew what I was getting myself into when I installed 5.0, it would be nice get things solved, for FreeBSD's sake already. Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave things like this in:

Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
Kenneth Culver wrote: I hope someone could bring light to what's going on. Alltho I'm not whining, I knew what I was getting myself into when I installed 5.0, it would be nice get things solved, for FreeBSD's sake already. Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave

only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Charlie ROOT
I am working the kinks out of an upgrade from 4.7 to 5.0-R. So far I see a problem starting X. first off xinit does not seem to work. Was that removed in 5.0? Second, oly root can startx. When I try as a regular user, I get the message: 'Fatal server error connot open log file

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Adam Maas
Your permissions for /var/log are wrong. --Adam - Original Message - From: Charlie ROOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:30 PM Subject: only root can startx I am working the kinks out of an upgrade from 4.7 to 5.0-R. So far I see a problem

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Charlie ROOT
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, David Wolfskill wrote: See /usr/ports/x11/wrapper. I have wrapper installed lorax# pkg_info | grep wrapper fampp-1.1 A C++ wrapper for fam from SGI gtkmm-1.2.8_1 C++ wrapper for gtk, a x11 graphics library javavmwrapper-1.4 Wrapper script for various

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
No, probably not. The original user to start X was probably root and then the file was created. If another user then tries to start X (assuming they are allowed), then they may not be able to append to that log file because it will have permissions and ownership set for root. Also, startx does

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Charlie ROOT
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Adam Maas wrote: Your permissions for /var/log are wrong. they are: lorax# ls -l XFree86.0.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 23375 Jan 23 12:20 XFree86.0.log shouldn't that be correct? --Adam - Original Message - From: Charlie ROOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
Not if you are trying to log to that file from an X server started under a regular user. You could put the user you want into the wheel group and then add permissions for write at the group level. Or just a+w. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: Charlie ROOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:50:36AM -0600, Ben Hockenhull wrote: Use acpidump(8) and grep(1) for MOUE. The definition of _HID is the PnP id that you need to add. It probably is 0x0190d94d in your case. You can add the PnP id, or checkout -rHEAD, because it's fixed already. Exactly what I

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Jonathan Belson
Charlie ROOT wrote: removed in 5.0? Second, oly root can startx. When I try as a regular user, I get the message: 'Fatal server error connot open log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log' what's going on here? Try deinstalling then reinstalling 'wrapper'. I've found you have to do this when upgrading

malloc.conf (was Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE)

2003-01-23 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
Dan Nelson wrote: # ls -l /etc/malloc.conf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Jan 23 11:52 /etc/malloc.conf - HR H and should only make a difference if you are low on memory. Yes. R is on by default in 5.0 anyway, due to A and J being on by default. That's not what the malloc(3) man page

RE: Time keeping problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread John Baldwin
On 23-Jan-2003 Patrick Hartling wrote: I just updated a 4.7-STABLE system (last rebuilt using sources from Jan 7, 2003) to 5.0-RELEASE, and now the system clock is going nuts. I had the same problem when I updated from 3-STABLE to 4-STABLE quite a while back. To solve the problem then, I

Re: malloc.conf (was Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE)

2003-01-23 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:14:46PM -0500, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: Dan Nelson wrote: # ls -l /etc/malloc.conf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Jan 23 11:52 /etc/malloc.conf - HR H and should only make a difference if you are low on memory. Yes. R is on by default in 5.0 anyway,

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Ben Hockenhull
At 10:50 AM -0800 1/23/03, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:50:36AM -0600, Ben Hockenhull wrote: Use acpidump(8) and grep(1) for MOUE. The definition of _HID is the PnP id that you need to add. It probably is 0x0190d94d in your case. You can add the PnP id, or checkout

Re: buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0

2003-01-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:15:24AM -0800, Evan Dower wrote: An update: CVSup'ing didn't fix the problem, but when I deleted the rtld.c and mv'd /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.hide, it stopped at /usr/src/contrib/amd/amd/srvr_nfs.c. So, I deleted that file, CVSup'd, and built again, and

5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, current! How are you? When I needed to experiment with 4.6-RELEASE and I didn't have ``free'' computer, I installed 4.6-RELEASE on VMWare. It works pretty well and I was totally satisfied. My host is: 2xP!!!-770Mhz, 512Mb of memory, Hardware RAID with 2x40Gb IBM IDE HDDs (and

Re: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:50:01PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, current! How are you? When I needed to experiment with 4.6-RELEASE and I didn't have ``free'' computer, I installed 4.6-RELEASE on VMWare. It works pretty well and I was totally satisfied. My host is:

Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread John David Duncan
H and should only make a difference if you are low on memory. R is on by default in 5.0 anyway, due to A and J being on by default. Setting malloc.conf to aj makes it work like it does in 4.*. Here are some benchmarks to illustrate that, using ubench (from /usr/ports/benchmarks) on a dual

Re: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:50:01PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: It doesn't work under VMWare 3.2! Ok, it works, really. But speed is VERY low. I even could not do installation! Unpacking of distributive have been started at normal speed, but after 2 or 3 minutes speed decreased to

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:44:49PM -0600, Ben Hockenhull wrote: Exactly what I needed to know. I discovered that it's actually 0x090cd041 for my Vaio R505EC. I've added that to pcm.c and recompiled and it's now found and works normally. Hmmm That PnP id is a generic id (has the

Re[2]: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Brooks! Thursday, January 23, 2003, 10:56:28 PM, you wrote: BD From sys/i386/conf/NOTES: BD # CPU_DISABLE_CMPXCHG disables the CMPXCHG instruction on i386 IA32 BD # machines. VmWare seems to emulate this instruction poorly, causing BD # the guest OS to run very slowly. Enabling this

Re: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:04:32PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hmm... I need installer with special kernel... Is it possible without building full release? I don't know of a way to do it without building a release, though I think you might be able to get by with only a buildworld and

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:37:55PM -0600, Charlie ROOT wrote: See /usr/ports/x11/wrapper. I have wrapper installed lorax# pkg_info | grep wrapper fampp-1.1 A C++ wrapper for fam from SGI gtkmm-1.2.8_1 C++ wrapper for gtk, a x11 graphics library

pw

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw? The patch is attached. Other variant is to enable using '$' only at end of user name. /fjoe Index: pw_user.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/pw/pw_user.c,v retrieving

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:37:55 -0600 (CST) Charlie ROOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CR CR CR On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, David Wolfskill wrote: CR CR See /usr/ports/x11/wrapper. CR CR I have wrapper installed If you have updated your X server since installing wrapper the link will be pointing

-current error in kernel build with NO_GEOM

2003-01-23 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Am I the only person using NO_GEOM in -current? Here the relevant error output from ``make buildkernel'' (cvsup 5 minutes ago): cc -c -pipe -O -march=athlon-xp -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual

Re: Error Mounting /dev/acd0 on /dist: during sysinstall of5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Paul A. Mayer wrote: Nate suggests: Does setting hw.ata.atapi_dma=1 help? How would you do this in the clean installation scenario. Is there a way to pass this setting to the kernel during the boot process, or modify the running environment by some other means

Re: Time keeping problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Patrick Hartling
That fixed it. Thanks a bunch. :) -Patrick John Baldwin wrote: On 23-Jan-2003 Patrick Hartling wrote: I just updated a 4.7-STABLE system (last rebuilt using sources from Jan 7, 2003) to 5.0-RELEASE, and now the system clock is going nuts. I had the same problem when I updated from 3-STABLE

Re: pw

2003-01-23 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:25:38AM +0600, Max Khon wrote: hi, there! Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw? The patch is attached. The same patch was submitted here by David Chapman:

calcru: negative time ... messages in 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Bill Moran
I posted this to -STABLE on Monday, since then I've come to understand that -STABLE doesn't really include 5.0 (even though it's been released). That, combined with the fact that I received no answer, has propted me to post this to -CURRENT. Following is my original post: original post We're

Re: Re[2]: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Brooks! Thursday, January 23, 2003, 10:56:28 PM, you wrote: BD From sys/i386/conf/NOTES: BD # CPU_DISABLE_CMPXCHG disables the CMPXCHG instruction on i386 IA32 BD # machines. VmWare seems to emulate this instruction poorly, causing BD #

Re: calcru: negative time ... messages in 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
See thread just above your post, titled Re: Time keeping problems with 5.0-RELEASE -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: pw

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:54:18PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw? The patch is attached. The same patch was submitted here by David Chapman:

Re: -current error in kernel build with NO_GEOM

2003-01-23 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gary Jennejohn w rites: Am I the only person using NO_GEOM in -current? Probably. NO_GEOM is scheduled to be removed as an option in some weeks, so if there is a bug or other issue which prevents you from running GEOM this would be a really good time to tell me.

Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is one of the crunched programs, I realised that I really needed to make newfs(8) use libufs. To show off that it *can* help us reduce space, a good bit in some cases. Well, after an afternoon of work, here's the diff. Some of

Re: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Kenneth Culver
the vmware people don't list 5.0 as a supported os... theres probably a reason for this. Ken On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, current! How are you? When I needed to experiment with 4.6-RELEASE and I didn't have ``free'' computer, I installed 4.6-RELEASE on VMWare. It

/dev/dsp disappears while being used

2003-01-23 Thread Alexander Langer
Folks. I heard on IRC others are seeing this as well: I'm using FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Thu Jan 9 22:49:45 CET 2003 on i386, but it used to happen since at least December, maybe even November (I'm always using more or less recent -CURRENT's). I didn't happen before, so I can be rather sure

Re: /dev/dsp disappears while being used

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Alexander Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: /dev/dsp disappears while being used ] When I then symbolically link /dev/dsp to one of the dspX.X devices, XMMS can play sound for some more time, but then these are disappearing as well. Is this a devfs bug?

Re: /dev/dsp disappears while being used

2003-01-23 Thread Kenneth Culver
This may be related to the vchans stuff in in the pcm driver. Ken On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Alexander Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: /dev/dsp disappears while being used ] When I then symbolically link /dev/dsp to one of the dspX.X

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is one of the crunched programs, I realised that I really needed to make newfs(8) use libufs. To show off that it *can* help us reduce space, a good bit in some cases. Good to see

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is one of the crunched programs, I realised that I

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] [rambling, and a patch] I thought every bit of code that would possibly write out was protected by Nflag, it isn't. I'll re-instate the wtfs function as a wrapper to

Re: -current error in kernel build with NO_GEOM

2003-01-23 Thread Gary Jennejohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gary Jennejohn w rites: Am I the only person using NO_GEOM in -current? Probably. NO_GEOM is scheduled to be removed as an option in some weeks, so if there is a bug or other issue which prevents you from running GEOM this

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] * De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] [rambling, and a patch] I thought

Re: /dev/dsp disappears while being used

2003-01-23 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Kenneth Culver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This may be related to the vchans stuff in in the pcm driver. Good point. I don't know when I activated the vchans stuff, but I think it was approx. the time the error occured for the first time. Let's see if the error occurs again. Alex To

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: Thanks to Ruslan's reminder that tunefs now uses libufs and tunefs is one of

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread takawata
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:50:36AM -0600, Ben Hockenhull wrote: Use acpidump(8) and grep(1) for MOUE. The definition of _HID is the PnP id that you need to add. It probably is 0x0190d94d in your case. You can add the PnP id, or checkout

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use

Re: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 11:56 AM -0800 1/23/03, Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:50:01PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Now I'm trying to look at 5.0-RELEASE (I've downloaded ISO of first i386 CD). It doesn't work under VMWare 3.2! Ok, it works, really. But speed is VERY low. I even

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] * De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett

Re: /dev/dsp disappears while being used

2003-01-23 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:10:05PM +0100, Alexander Langer wrote: Folks. I heard on IRC others are seeing this as well: I'm using FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #2: Thu Jan 9 22:49:45 CET 2003 on i386, but it used to happen since at least December, maybe even November (I'm always using more or less

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs. ] I just went to do this, and found that pwrite is failing, saying EBADF. Could this be because of the failed ioctl? I'm not sure why this is happening. Any

Re: 5.0-RELEASE VMWare 3.2

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote: Someone recently added an 'SMP' file to sys/i386/conf, which just includes GENERIC, changes the 'ident' and then turns on the SMP and APIC_IO options. Perhaps we should add a VMWARE one, with an eye towards building a vmware-appropriate kernel

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:24:20AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm That PnP id is a generic id (has the PNP prefix). A Sony specific PnP id is 0xd94d... Your Id is one for an ACPI embedded controller and I don't think it has to be a mouse. I suspect there's a _CID value as well

Re: Test this! Patch to make newfs(8) use libufs.

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: Here's the URL once more: http://people.freebsd.org/~jmallett/newfs-libufs.diff Two minor issues: one use of if Nflag is left near the beginning of the diff and would prefer the check in bwrite() be if !Nflag instead of returning early. -Nate

acpi problem ???

2003-01-23 Thread Bryan Liesner
I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related problem. When booting, the kernel loads, detects the devices, then hangs right here: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a pid 84 (fsck_ufs), uid 0:

Re: help: can't boot 5.0 diskless

2003-01-23 Thread Mike Makonnen
Do you have device.hints in /boot of your diskless tree? -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fingerprint: D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9 msg50827/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: acpi problem ???

2003-01-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related problem. When booting, the kernel loads, detects the devices, then hangs right here: Mounting root

5.0-RELEASE failing on Thinkpad T30

2003-01-23 Thread stark
Well, I have a brand new IBM Thinkpad and it shipped with XP so I decided to put FreeBSD on it. 4.7 (after I gave up on 5.0) installs and works FINE. no problems whatsoever. 5.0, when I install it, does a kernel panic, randomly about 5 minutes into the processing of packages. I don't know what

Re: calcru: negative time ... messages in 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Bill Moran
Nate Lawson wrote: See thread just above your post, titled Re: Time keeping problems with 5.0-RELEASE Thanks for the reply, Nate. I've searched the -CURRENT mailing list archives for a number of combinations of the title you describe and haven't found anything. Any suggestions? -- Bill Moran

Re: acpi problem ???

2003-01-23 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related problem. When booting, the kernel loads, detects the

cbb: unsupported card type detected

2003-01-23 Thread Søren Vrist
Does subj mean that my cardbus brigde isn't supported ? (even though the relnotes for 5.0 says that all cardbus brigdes is supported) Cause it allways comes with that mesg, even thought theres no card in. I tried booting an oldcard kernel, still no use for my 16bit Netgear MA401 card, which was

Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Atte Peltomaki wrote: Description: Every time machine is under heavy load (CPU, network, disks) it completely jamms for fraction of a second for every ten seconds or so, everything just stops and then continues. I noticed this while compiling software and copying files over NFS while

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Ben Hockenhull
At 12:04 PM -0800 1/23/03, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:44:49PM -0600, Ben Hockenhull wrote: Exactly what I needed to know. I discovered that it's actually 0x090cd041 for my Vaio R505EC. I've added that to pcm.c and recompiled and it's now found and works normally.

Re: pw

2003-01-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Max Khon wrote: most messages were related to adduser.pl. adduser.pl has gone and adduser.sh now uses pw directly as for login class and group names -- there is nothing wrong with '$' in them but if anyone would be uncomfortable with it why not commit the patch that someone (Terry?)

5.0 kernel can't print to console ???(was can't boot 5.0 diskless)

2003-01-23 Thread Dong Lin
Hi, I am having trouble booting 5.0 diskless. My setup works for booting 4.x perfectly. If I replace the the 5.0 image with a 4.7 diskless image, it works fine. The 5.0 kernel crashes without printing a single char to the console. But my NFS traces shows that the last file loaded via NFS before

Options MAXMEM added to GENERIC kernel config causes kernel panicin -current

2003-01-23 Thread Vincent Poy
Greetings everyone, With the latest -CURRENTs ever since atleast September 12, 2002 that I have tested on several different machines ranging from PII/PIII/PIV Desktop and Notebooks, whenever the following option is added to the GENERIC kernel config, the kernel will panic on booting up.

Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 23), Terry Lambert said: Atte Peltomaki wrote: Description: Every time machine is under heavy load (CPU, network, disks) it completely jamms for fraction of a second for every ten seconds or so, everything just stops and then continues. I noticed this while

Re: Options MAXMEM added to GENERIC kernel config causes kernel panic in -current

2003-01-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 23), Vincent Poy said: Greetings everyone, With the latest -CURRENTs ever since atleast September 12, 2002 that I have tested on several different machines ranging from PII/PIII/PIV Desktop and Notebooks, whenever the following option is added to the GENERIC

November-December 2002 FreeBSD Bi-Monthly Status report

2003-01-23 Thread Scott Long
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed: Unrecognized November-December 2002 Status Report Introduction: At long last, FreeBSD 5.0 is here. Along with putting the final polish on the tree, FreeBSD developers somehow found the time to work on

Re: pw

2003-01-23 Thread Mike Makonnen
Attached is Terry's patch modified to include $ in group names as well. I have tested it. Both adduser(8) and rmuser(8) work as expected. Please give -audit a chance to object and then commit it. Also, please close PR: bin/46890 when you do. We should have had this a long time ago. If -audit

make release fails building floppies ...

2003-01-23 Thread Marc G. Fournier
I'm slowly getting closer, but am not quite there yet :( I'm at the stage where its building teh floppies, but its telling me that the md devices are out of disk space: if [ -d /R/stage/driversfd ]; then sh -e /usr/local/5.0/src/release/scripts/doFS.sh /R/stage/floppies/drivers.flp /R/stage

Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Dan Nelson wrote: If you lean on the keyboard, or if you set up the network adapters as entropy sources, does the problem fix itself? If you're thinking it's /dev/random blocking on him, 5.0's output never blocks. Its output is a PRNG periodically seeded from random data, including

Re: make release fails building floppies ...

2003-01-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: make release fails building floppies ... ] I'm slowly getting closer, but am not quite there yet :( I'm at the stage where its building teh floppies, but its telling me that the md devices are out of disk

Re: Options MAXMEM added to GENERIC kernel config causes kernel panic in -current

2003-01-23 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 05:40:16PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote: /boot/kernel/acpi.ko text=0x2fab4 data=-0x1a84+0x6e0 syms=[0x4+0x5540+0x702d|] snip embedded 0 6 A 0x60 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 panic: pmap_mapdev: Couldn't alloc kernel virtual memory Debugger(panic) Stopped at

Re: Performance problems with 5.0-RELEASE

2003-01-23 Thread Mike Makonnen
Just a me too. I have a procmail filter that uses spamassissin to filter all my incomming mail (downloaded with fetchmail). I have noticed that if I get a lot of messages at once, interactive response degrades tremendously with a lot of perl processes stuck in either swread or pfault state. The

Re: make release fails building floppies ...

2003-01-23 Thread Marc G. Fournier
got it ... figured out how the mfsfd/modules is generated, and just trim'd down the driver.conf file to the bare essentials ... On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-23 ] [ Subjecte: make release fails building floppies ... ]

Re: pw

2003-01-23 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:25 AM +0600 1/24/03, Max Khon wrote: hi, there! Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw? The patch is attached. Other variant is to enable using '$' only at end of user name. I'd prefer to go with only at the end of a user name, and I did have a patch which does that. Now I just have

re:VmWare

2003-01-23 Thread Kirill Pisman
im had no troubles with 5-RELEASE under VmWare 3.2.1 ... host is Windows XP proffecional , with tualatin processor but on AtlonXP it dont works at all . and also im find , that sysinstall runs much better from real boot cdrom , othervise there is some problems with bootloader ...

Re: help: can't boot 5.0 diskless

2003-01-23 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:50:12PM -0500, Mike Makonnen wrote: Do you have device.hints in /boot of your diskless tree? I think you have to statically link your hints into the kernel. Mark -- Mark SantcroosRIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/

  1   2   >