Re: background processes stuck in locks with ULE

2003-07-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 01:48:39PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote: > Trying out ULE scheduling on an SMP machine causes background processes > to be stuck in locks. > > One or two processes will always get stuck in *Giant (and takes up like > 60% of lock) and if these are killed, then other processes

where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello all, while my CF-Card USB adaptor is crashing 5.1 and my NEC USB floppy also crashes 5.1 I found that sysctl -w kern.cam.da.no_6_byte=1 could help but it seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything similar? It also seems I'm a bit unlucky these days with 5.1. CF-Reader

Re: Negative bio_offset -current kernel panic

2003-07-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron Wohl" writes: >I got a got this kernel panic: >geom/geom_dev.c:("Negative bio_offset (%jd) on bio %p", > >Anyone seeing this also? Please put DDB in your kernel and try to reproduce, then capture traceback etc. (see handbook). -- Poul-Henning Ka

i386 'make release' broken

2003-07-20 Thread Scott Long
Just got the following from a 'make release BUILDNAME=5.1-CURRENT CHROOTDIR=/usr/release CVSROOT=/usr/ncvs NOPORTS= NODOC= ". My world was up to date to within a day. The full log is at http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/current-release-i386.log.gz. Note that while this is an SMP machine, -j was

Re: Annoucning DragonFly BSD!

2003-07-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Wouldn't it be possible to achive the same result without the VFS with :well organized lib subdirs? like "usr/lib/xyzlib1.2/" and :"usr/lib/xyzlib1.3/" which would maintain the install for any given :version of a lib? In other words, instead of just dumping all the libs :into the one place, yo

Erratum: Re: Fixing gcc 3.3 compile failures -- kde ports proposal

2003-07-20 Thread Peter Kadau
Hi ! > With those settings, I could do a forced upgrade for everything. Ahem, not quite true, I forgot kdebase3. Everything configures, but that thing is the only reluctant to build. Some sort of known problem with static_cast as far as I can see. So - no portupgrade -fa on my current... *sigh

Re: i386 'make release' broken

2003-07-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:18:42AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > Just got the following from a 'make release BUILDNAME=5.1-CURRENT > CHROOTDIR=/usr/release CVSROOT=/usr/ncvs NOPORTS= NODOC= ". My > world was up to date to within a day. The full log is at > http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/current-

make release of CURRENT on 4.7 broken again ?

2003-07-20 Thread Andrey Elperin
Hi, A few days ago I've noticed such messages in CURRENT buildlog (on 4.7 box, building without -j) : cc -Os -pipe -c chown_stub.c ld -dc -r -o chown.lo chown_stub.o /usr/obj//usr/src/usr.sbin/chown/chown.o crunchide -k _crunched_chown_stub chown.lo echo "int _crunched_chroot_stub(int argc, c

Re: make release of CURRENT on 4.7 broken again ?

2003-07-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:04:28PM +0300, Andrey Elperin wrote: > > Hi, > > A few days ago I've noticed such messages in CURRENT buildlog (on 4.7 > box, building without -j) : > > cc -Os -pipe -c chown_stub.c > ld -dc -r -o chown.lo chown_stub.o /usr/obj//usr/src/usr.sbin/chown/chown.o > crun

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-07-20 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-20 11:13:14 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-07-20 11:13:14 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-20 11:15:11 - building world TB

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-07-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:53:43AM +, Tinderbox wrote: > >>> stage 4: building everything.. > [...] > ===> bin/ed > cc -O -pipe -DDES-Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual > -Wwrite-strings -W

possible unionfs bug

2003-07-20 Thread Divacky Roman
Hi, I might be wrong but this: free(mp->mnt_data, M_UNIONFSMNT); /* XXX */ mp->mnt_data = 0; seems to me wrong and might cause crashes etc. am I correct or wrong? its from union_vfsops.c:384 thnx Roman Divacky ___ [

Re: Erratum: Re: Fixing gcc 3.3 compile failures -- kde portsproposal

2003-07-20 Thread Andy Fawcett
On Sunday 20 July 2003 12:59, Peter Kadau wrote: > Hi ! > > > With those settings, I could do a forced upgrade for everything. > > Ahem, not quite true, I forgot kdebase3. > Everything configures, but that thing is the only > reluctant to build. > > Some sort of known problem with static_cast as fa

Re: msdof and fstab

2003-07-20 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am having trouble mounting my windows partition from the fstab file. I have an > entry in fstab that looks like this "/dev/ad6s5 /mnt/disk2 msdosfs rw 0 0". > When I try to mount the disk I get the following error "mount: disk2: unknown >

Re: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:13:51 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hello all, > > while my CF-Card USB adaptor is crashing 5.1 and my NEC USB floppy also > crashes 5.1 I found that sysctl -w kern.cam.da.no_6_byte=1 could help but it > seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! > Is there any

Re: possible unionfs bug

2003-07-20 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 03:02:21PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: +> I might be wrong but this: +> +> free(mp->mnt_data, M_UNIONFSMNT); /* XXX */ +> mp->mnt_data = 0; +> +> seems to me wrong and might cause crashes etc. +> am I correct or wrong? Could you describe scenar

Re: 5.1 setfacl problem

2003-07-20 Thread Branko F. Gracnar
>specify what POSIX.1e considers an incomplete ACL and rejects. Try using: > > setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o::rx,u:some_user:rwx,m:rwx test_directory # setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o:rx,g:some_group:rwx,m:rwx test_directory setfacl: acl_from_text() failed: Invalid argument ... Brane _

Re: OT:escaping X barfings

2003-07-20 Thread Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all! CAn you tell me how a procedure how to patch X and kernel to avoid X barfings from securelevel? My release is a FreeBSD 5.1. You might want to replace "barfing" with an actual description of the problem. I looked for patches, unfortunately they're more than a ye

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! > > Is there anything similar? > > It has been renamed: > > kern.cam.da.%d.minimum_cmd_size > > Where %d is the unit number for the da(4) device. Thaks a lot! Where can I find such info? I looked via cvsweb for scsi_da.c bu

Re: OT:escaping X barfings

2003-07-20 Thread Farid Hajji
> > CAn you tell me how a procedure how to patch X and kernel > > to avoid X barfings from securelevel? My release is a FreeBSD 5.1. > > 2) adding `options APERTURE` to my kernel > > 3) make buildkernel && make install kernel && make > > buildworld 4) reboot and fa

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! > > > Is there anything similar? > > > > It has been renamed: > > kern.cam.da.%d.minimum_cmd_size > > > > Where %d is the unit number for the da(4) device. > > Thaks a lo

Re: background processes stuck in locks with ULE

2003-07-20 Thread Khairil Yusof
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:09, Kris Kennaway wrote: > The process stats are not updated properly under ULE at the moment. > If a process takes up 60% of CPU and then sleeps, top will continue to > show it at 60% until the next time it runs. It does not in fact > continue to use CPU. In my case if

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! > > > > Is there anything similar? > > > > > > It has been renamed: > > > kern.cam.da.%d.minimum_cmd_size > > > > > > Where %d is the

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > > > Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > > seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! > > > > > Is there anything similar? > > > > > > > > It has been renamed:

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2003-07-20 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-20 17:33:21 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-07-20 17:33:21 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-20 17:35:21 - building world TB --- cd /

login(1) doesn't enforce times.allow/times.deny over ssh(1)

2003-07-20 Thread Farid Hajji
I'm trying to set up a login class on 5.1-R which limits users from logging in at night or on week ends. Unfortunately, the time limits are not enforced by login(1), when the host is accessed via ssh (only from the console are the time limits enforced): In /etc/login.conf, I've set this: time_li

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-20 18:14:53 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-07-20 18:14:53 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-20 18:16:50 - building world TB --- cd /home

compressed modules

2003-07-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
Please try the enclosed patch. It adds support to sysinstall for compressed modules. I think this will save some space on the drivers disk since it isn't currently compressed (unless I'm smoking the good stuff). Warner Index: modules.c

Re: login(1) doesn't enforce times.allow/times.deny over ssh(1)

2003-07-20 Thread Doug White
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Farid Hajji wrote: > When using ssh, I'm not trying public/private keys, > just plain unix passwords. Doesn't ssh access login(1) > in this case? sshd does not use login unless requested to do so by the UseLogin config parameter. There have been security vulnerabilities expo

Re: 5.1 setfacl problem

2003-07-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Branko F. Gracnar wrote: > >specify what POSIX.1e considers an incomplete ACL and rejects. Try using: > > > > setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o::rx,u:some_user:rwx,m:rwx test_directory Looks like you might have some typos: > # setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o:rx,g:some_group:rwx,m:rwx

Re: login(1) doesn't enforce times.allow/times.deny over ssh(1)

2003-07-20 Thread Farid Hajji
On Sunday 20 July 2003 09:38 pm, Doug White wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Farid Hajji wrote: > > When using ssh, I'm not trying public/private keys, > > just plain unix passwords. Doesn't ssh access login(1) > > in this case? > > sshd does not use login unless requested to do so by the UseLogin con

Jail Roadmap

2003-07-20 Thread Rus Foster
Hi All, I know recently that the jails have changed maintainer and I just wondered if there is any road map of features that will be upcoming and in which versions.. cheers Rus -- www: http://jvds.com | Virtual Servers from just $15/mo MSNM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Totally Customizable Technology

Re: Jail Roadmap

2003-07-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rus Foster writes: >I know recently that the jails have changed maintainer and I just wondered >if there is any road map of features that will be upcoming and in which >versions.. Well... Jails havn't quite changed maintainer because both Robert Watson and I have

putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time.

2003-07-20 Thread Andrew Lankford
Kernel: FreeBSD bogushost2 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sat Jul 19 23:38:13 EDT 2003[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ARL5KERNEL i386 Since I kept on getting "stray irq 7"'s with my laserjet 4, I decided to set my parallel port to use polled mode at boottime. While I guess I co

Re: USB crappiness?

2003-07-20 Thread Bruce Cran
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:06:16AM -0400, Bryan Liesner wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I tried to upgrade my workstation to current recently, and I have to > > use a lot of USB, and while using some USB mass storage device, with > > a UFS filesystem on it, and

Re: gcc-3.3 issues

2003-07-20 Thread LLeweLLyn Reese
Peter Kadau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi ! > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning%20Options > > Hmm, that's exactly as in the info page. > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3/gcc/C---Dialect-Options.html#C++%20Dialect%20Options > > > and search f

Re: putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time.

2003-07-20 Thread Andrew Lankford
Before anyone corrects me, yes, the man page says bit 5 controls polling, 0x20. My question stands. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[

telnet build fails without openssl...

2003-07-20 Thread Anti
buildworld fails at telnet if you build with NOCRYPT and NO_OPENSSL -- telnet stuff is looking for NO_CRYPTO to disable this, which isn't documented anywhere... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Peter Wemm
Tinderbox wrote: > gzip -cn /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/cat gets.3 > catgets.3.gz > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > *** Error code 139 These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a problem with the tinderbox build machine perhaps? Cheers, -Pet

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-07-20 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-20 21:51:58 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-07-20 21:51:58 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-20 21:54:00 - building world TB

Re: putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time.

2003-07-20 Thread Marc Fonvieille
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 03:29:02PM -0600, Andrew Lankford wrote: [...] > ppc0 port 0x778-0x77f,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 > ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold > ppbus0: on ppc0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven p

Re: Fixing gcc 3.3 compile failures -- fix for math/freefem

2003-07-20 Thread Simon Barner
Hi, > > -ifstream fin( path ); > > +std::ifstream fin( path ); > A much smaller patch could be produced with > > using namespace std; > > as appropriate. > > Have you checked with the upstream author to see which approach is > likely to be rolled into the distribution? Actually, upg

gconftool-2 failing

2003-07-20 Thread Rik
I have recently run into a problem with the gconftool-2 service that comes with gnome2. When I go into X I get a gcond process that runs out of control. If I try to install ports that require the gconftool-2 to run the port will fail to install. The error message I see is this gconftool-2 in fr

Re: putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time.

2003-07-20 Thread Evan Dower
I may be smoking crack, but isn't it: bit 5 = 0001 = 0x10 ? bit 6 = 0010 = 0x20 ? E From: "Andrew Lankford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time. Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:40:21 -0600 Before an

Re: putting /dev/lpt in polling mode in boot time.

2003-07-20 Thread Andrew Lankford
>Try to disable ACPI. > >Marc Ah yes. Just noticed that in the FAQ. I'll fiddle with that when I've got the time. Might as well disable acpi since it barely works on my machine anyway. Apart from the power button, that is. Thanks Andrew Lankford __

Re: USB crappiness?

2003-07-20 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Juli Mallett wrote this message on Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 19:42 -0500: > I tried to upgrade my workstation to current recently, and I have to > use a lot of USB, and while using some USB mass storage device, with > a UFS filesystem on it, and doing a large operation to it (tar c|tar x) > everything d

Re: Buildworld fails in 5.1

2003-07-20 Thread Matt Loschert
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Matt Loschert wrote: > > After grepping through the build log > > for error messages, I found the following output, which appears to be some > > sort of build loop gone wild: > > > > First this > > -- > > Results of making rescue.cache: > > MAKEOB

Re: Buildworld fails in 5.1

2003-07-20 Thread Matt Loschert
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Tim Kientzle wrote: > > Matt Loschert wrote: > >> Then the following output repeated 363 times > >> > >> > >> crunchgen: make error: Remaking `crunchgen_objs' > >> > >> crunchgen: make error: Results of making

Re: Buildworld fails in 5.1

2003-07-20 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 9:48 PM -0400 7/20/03, Matt Loschert wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Crunchgen writes out and runs a short makefile in order to grab build information from a particular program. Since /rescue has about 120 components, you should see 'crunchgen_objs' and 'loop' targets get

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-07-20 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-21 04:00:00 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-07-21 04:00:00 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-21 04:02:04 - building world TB --- cd /

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tinderbox wrote: > > gzip -cn > > /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/catgets.3 > > > catgets.3.gz > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > *** Error code 139 > These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a problem wit

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tinderbox wrote: >> > gzip -cn >> > /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/catgets.3 > >> > catgets.3.gz >> > Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Harti Brandt
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Peter Wemm wrote: PW>Tinderbox wrote: PW> PW>> gzip -cn /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/cat PW>gets.3 > catgets.3.gz PW>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) PW>> *** Error code 139 PW> PW>These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a