on 10/09/2010 01:57 Doug Barton said the following:
On 9/8/2010 7:39 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Perhaps as an interim measure a local procmail rule to filter out cvsup
failures from going to the list ?
That's a particularly unhelpful response. Not only is it borderline rude to
attempt to shift
At 06:57 PM 9/9/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
Normally they are pointed to a local mirror here at Sentex. However,
that server was having hardware problems which I think we have isolated
and resolved now. I will repoint this tinderbox to the local site again.
The best way to handle this would be
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
hi there,
except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS.
is
this really necessary? shouldn't DEFAULTS only
On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
hi there,
except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in
conf/DEFAULTS. is
While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
(presumably the ones to profile the code and optimise). The kernel
spouts messages about Starting event timers: LAPIC @ 1000Hz, HPET @
127Hz; then LAPIC @
On 2010-09-10 15:50, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
(presumably the ones to profile the code and optimise). The kernel
spouts messages about Starting event
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:31:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2010-09-10 15:50, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
(presumably the ones to profile the
Hi folks,
I personally agree that a DHCP client must exists in base, and for
this purpose we have dhclient. However soon I will have a new small
machine that will only work as bind and dhcpd server.
I was surprised to see that there is no DHCP server in base, obviously
it's not difficult to
Hi.
Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
(presumably the ones to profile the code and optimise). The kernel
spouts messages about Starting event timers: LAPIC
On 09/10/2010 14:40, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:31:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2010-09-10 15:50, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some
On 09/10/2010 15:31, Alexander Motin wrote:
It is reported deadlock between event timers and some IPI senders, like
TLB invalidation, during switching to/from profiling clock rate. In
forthcoming version of event timer patch this problem should not happen.
You can get latest version of the
David DEMELIER ha scritto:
I was surprised to see that there is no DHCP server in base, obviously
it's not difficult to fetch the net/isc-dhcp31-server package but for
people that would like to setup a new server on FreeBSD quickly they
will take some time to learn how packages framework works
Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
On 09/10/2010 15:31, Alexander Motin wrote:
It is reported deadlock between event timers and some IPI senders, like
TLB invalidation, during switching to/from profiling clock rate. In
forthcoming version of event timer patch this problem should not happen.
You can
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt
packages at install time, and with a modest amount of effort can install
prebuilt packages afterwards.
IMO, such as it is, there should be *less* in the base system than there
currently is and more in ports.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
David DEMELIER ha scritto:
I was surprised to see that there is no DHCP server in base, obviously
it's not difficult to fetch the net/isc-dhcp31-server package but for
people that would like to setup a new server on FreeBSD
2010/9/10 Matthew Jacob m...@feral.com:
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt packages at
install time, and with a modest amount of effort can install prebuilt
packages afterwards.
IMO, such as it is, there should be *less* in the base system than there
currently is
On 9/10/2010 12:54 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 06:57 PM 9/9/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
Normally they are pointed to a local mirror here at Sentex. However,
that server was having hardware problems which I think we have isolated
and resolved now. I will repoint this tinderbox to the local site
At 02:02 PM 9/10/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
In that case I apologize for the misunderstanding. I've used
procmail for many years on the receiving end but was not aware of
the ability to use it in the manner you suggested.
Have the tinderbox send just one email to a local account, then use
On 9/10/2010 11:22 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 02:02 PM 9/10/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
In that case I apologize for the misunderstanding. I've used procmail
for many years on the receiving end but was not aware of the ability
to use it in the manner you suggested.
Have the tinderbox send just
On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/9/10 Matthew Jacobm...@feral.com:
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt packages at
install time, and with a modest amount of effort can install prebuilt
packages afterwards.
IMO, such as it is, there should be *less*
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
And what about bind too?
As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to
do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
1. Get BIND out of the base!
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to
do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
1. Get BIND out of the base!
2. If we remove it, the command line tools (dig, host, nslookup) go with
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
I have a question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On a brand new system I'm trying to allocate new GPT partition with:
gpart create -s gpt ada0
gpart add -t freebsd-zfs ada0
And gpart hangs with g_waitfor_event with g_event spinning 100% of CPU.
Any thoughts? The system is FreeBSD/amd64 on
On Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28:58 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 08, 2010
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:06:45 +0200
Julien Laffaye kime...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to
do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
1. Get BIND out of the
I sent this out to the -scsi list earlier today. Testers would be
appreciated for the 6Gb LSI SAS driver.
Please follow up to me or the -scsi list.
Thanks,
Ken
- Forwarded message from Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org -
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:04:38 -0600
From: Kenneth D. Merry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2010 14:36, Doug Barton wrote:
On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/9/10 Matthew Jacobm...@feral.com:
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt
packages at install time, and with a modest amount of effort
On 09/10/2010 19:14, jhell wrote:
On 09/10/2010 14:36, Doug Barton wrote:
On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/9/10 Matthew Jacobm...@feral.com:
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt
packages at install time, and with a modest amount of effort can
Looking through a dmesg from today I noticed that the LAPIC timer is being
reported as running at 0 Hz:
Event timer LAPIC frequency 0 Hz quality 500
But the correct frequency is still being used in the kernel:
kern.eventtimer.et.LAPIC.frequency=67470437
--
Bruce Cran
On 9/10/2010 1:48 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
Hi,
another argument about hostapd :) if have access point we must have
way to assign IP for AP clients.
To start with, your assumption is wrong. DHCPd is not *actually* a
requirement, although I admit that practically it is.
Last spring I
Xin LI delphij at delphij.net writes:
Hi,
On a brand new system I'm trying to allocate new GPT partition with:
gpart create -s gpt ada0
gpart add -t freebsd-zfs ada0
And gpart hangs with g_waitfor_event with g_event spinning 100% of CPU.
Any thoughts? The system is FreeBSD/amd64
Nevermind me. That's what I thought why I was getting the same gpart behavior
switching between kernels, with and without DEBUG_LOCKS. Sorry about that.
Same here, gpart hangs on:
3826 gpartCALL __sysctl(0x7fffa250,0x3,0,0x7fffa268,0,0)
3826 gpartSCTL kern.geom.confxml
Yuri
Bruce Cran wrote:
Looking through a dmesg from today I noticed that the LAPIC timer is being
reported as running at 0 Hz:
Event timer LAPIC frequency 0 Hz quality 500
Frequency of LAPIC timer is not reported instantly. It requires
calibration to be discovered. Calibration requires time. To
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:33:22 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
On 9/10/2010 1:48 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
Hi,
another argument about hostapd :) if have access point we must have
way to assign IP for AP clients.
To start
35 matches
Mail list logo
