On 03-01-2012 18:33, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hi,
In the the recent sysinstall thread there seems to be general agreement that
having a post-install configuration tool is a good thing. Until such a
tool is written I think it would be a good idea to use sysinstall for
this purpose. I am willing
On 04/01/2012 03:39, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Where is the code for this? Would committing your sade additions now
to a project branch in Subversion
be appropriate? That way folks could check it out from SVN, and
provide comments and patches,
and help push things along faster.
When your code is
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:36:50AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
J why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there
is
J no output to this one can we
J
J 1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong
J return code or something maybe?), and
J
04.01.2012 13:57, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Does security_show_success=YES suppress the security report entirely
(no mail sent), if no security related issues found?
Yes.
PS: I also prefer setting *_show_badconfig to 'yes' in case something is
just not working right.
--
Sphinx of black quartz
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:57:53 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:36:50AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
J why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given
there is
J no output to this one can we
J
J 1) suppress the empty sections (to me that
Is it working correctly?
e.g. Choosing Polish ISO-8859-2
results in just
keymap=pl_PL.ISO8859-2.kbd
added to rc.conf, while to have fully
working polish fonts you need
font8x14=iso02-8x14
font8x16=iso02-8x16
font8x8=iso02-8x8
keymap=pl_PL.ISO8859-2
--
View this message in context:
Is vidfont invoked during installation at all?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bsdinstall-kbdmap-tp5119535p5119548.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
TB --- 2012-01-04 12:50:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-01-04 12:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2012-01-04 12:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-01-04 12:50:59 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-01-04 12:50:59 -
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Is vidfont invoked during installation at all?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bsdinstall-kbdmap-tp5119535p5119548.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at
That's not related at all.
For X you need something like
Option XkbLayout es
in xorg.conf, and I complained about
syscons settings after installation.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bsdinstall-kbdmap-tp5119535p5120710.html
Sent from the freebsd-current
sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=20
kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096
sysctl: kern.ipc.somaxconn: Invalid argument
sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=65536
kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096
sysctl: kern.ipc.somaxconn: Invalid argument
sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=65535
Or you could use x11/setxkbmap each time you login.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bsdinstall-kbdmap-tp5119535p5120743.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
Trying to stress test a framework here that tosses 100k of connections into a
listen queue before doing anything, I realize I'll have to use multiple local
IPs get get around port limitations, but why is
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
Even a backlog of a 1000 is large compared to the default listen queue size
of around 50 or 128. And if you can drain 1000 connections per second, a
65K backlog is big enough that plenty of clients (I'm thinking web-browsers
here in
On Dec 29, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 29/12/2011 18:39, Renato Botelho wrote:
IIRC, PCBSD installer can install a regular FreeBSD on ZFS.
It can do, but you're left with a /very/ basic installation - the hostname,
network interfaces etc. aren't configured, which could be a
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
Even a backlog of a 1000 is large compared to the default listen queue size of
around 50 or 128. And if you can drain 1000 connections per second, a 65K
backlog is big enough that plenty of clients (I'm
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Dan The Man wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
Even a backlog of a 1000 is large compared to the default listen queue
size of around 50 or 128. And if you can drain 1000 connections per
second, a 65K backlog
On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
Trying to stress test a framework here that tosses 100k of connections into a
listen queue before doing anything, I realize I'll have to use multiple local
IPs get get around port limitations, but why is this backlog using a limit?
Even a
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
However, I'm not convinced that it is useful to do this. At some point, you
are better off timing out and retrying via exponential backoff than you are
queuing hundreds of thousands of connections in the hopes that they will
eventually be
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
However, I'm not convinced that it is useful to do this. At some point,
you are better off timing out and retrying via exponential backoff than you
are queuing hundreds of
Hi,
in doing cross-builds of picobsd, i found i need a cross-version
of ldd so i can run it on the host to detect which shared libraries
are used by binaries on the target architecture
(for amd64-i386 there is a partial workaround, but don't know
if it works in other cases)
Is there any concern
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Hi,
in doing cross-builds of picobsd, i found i need a cross-version
of ldd so i can run it on the host to detect which shared libraries
are used by binaries on the target architecture
(for amd64-i386 there is a partial
Hello everybody,
I'd like to remind you that only ca. 10 days have left to the status
report submission deadline. Note that we have only received 4 entries so
far. I guess most of the people's holidays have finished by now so I
hope we will receive much more than that by January 15, 2012.
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
However, I'm not convinced that it is useful to do this. At some point,
you are better off timing out and retrying via
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
However, I'm not convinced that it is useful to do this. At some point, you
are
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:10:36PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Hi,
in doing cross-builds of picobsd, i found i need a cross-version
of ldd so i can
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Dan The Man d...@sunsaturn.com wrote:
sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=20
kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096
sysctl: kern.ipc.somaxconn: Invalid argument
sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=65536
kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096
sysctl:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, matt...@phoronix.com wrote:
Thanks.
My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to
ensure expected behaviour.
Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server
install ? If not, you should not have to
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:30:27PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
...
$ objdump -x `which tar` | awk '$1 == NEEDED { print $2 }'
libarchive.so.5
libbz2.so.4
libz.so.6
liblzma.so.5
libbsdxml.so.4
libcrypto.so.6
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Dan The Man wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
However, I'm not convinced that it is
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Dan The Man d...@sunsaturn.com wrote:
[...]
How about a sensible solution? I think everyone has been making valid points
here, about sensible limits for all programs on system and per application
limit changes.
How about changing the hard limit high, and
Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on
[1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva= riable leaves it in the default
configuration 'in the way the developers or= vendor wanted it for
production'. This is by rule.
However, i= nvariable the community or vendor for
Hi--
On Jan 4, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
It is not arbitrary. Systems ought to provide sensible limits, which can be
adjusted if needed and appropriate. The fact that a system might have
50,000 file descriptors globally available does not mean that it would be OK
for any
On 04/01/2012 2:23 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
in doing cross-builds of picobsd, i found i need a cross-version
of ldd so i can run it on the host to detect which shared libraries
are used by binaries on the target architecture
(for amd64-i386 there is a partial workaround, but don't know
if it
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:58:15PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:30:27PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
...
$ objdump -x `which tar` | awk '$1 == NEEDED { print $2 }'
libarchive.so.5
libbz2.so.4
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800
matt...@phoronix.com wrote:
Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking
on[1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the
developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poor
scores on be 'it should be
Hmm... No sure what happened there again. What I sent (pulled from my
Sent folder...
===
Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on
Phoronix.com http://Phoronix.com, Michael invariable leaves it in the
default configuration 'in the way the developers or vendor wanted it
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Jan 4, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
It is not arbitrary. Systems ought to provide sensible limits, which can be adjusted if
needed and appropriate. The fact that a system might have 50,000 file descriptors
globally available does
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, matt...@phoronix.com wrote:
Thanks.
My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to
ensure expected behaviour.
Why should you have to tune anything
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Or you could use x11/setxkbmap each time you login.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/bsdinstall-kbdmap-tp5119535p5120743.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Or you could use x11/setxkbmap each time you login.
--
View this message in context:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
With the new IBM developments underway of 16 core atom processors and
hundreds of gigabytes of memory, surely a backlog of 100k is manageable. Or
what about the future of 500 core systems with a terrabyte of memory, 100k
listen queue could be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/04/12 16:09, Dan The Man wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Jan 4, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Dan The Man wrote:
It is not arbitrary. Systems ought to provide sensible
limits, which can be adjusted if needed and
Hi, Xin--
On Jan 4, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Xin Li wrote:
I am personally quite convinced that FreeBSD should make such change
though -- having more than 64K of outstanding and unhandled
connections does not sound a great idea (i.e. it's not a connection
limit after all, but the pending handle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/04/12 17:49, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, Xin--
On Jan 4, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Xin Li wrote:
I am personally quite convinced that FreeBSD should make such
change though -- having more than 64K of outstanding and
unhandled connections does not
The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to
commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections.
CTL is a disk and processor device emulation subsystem originally written
for Copan Systems under Linux starting in 2003. It has been shipping in
Copan (now
The CAM Target Layer (CTL) is now available for testing. I am planning to
commit it to to head next week, barring any major objections.
CTL is a disk and processor device emulation subsystem originally written
for Copan Systems under Linux starting in 2003. It has been shipping in
Copan (now
I've posted a diff to -arm about 2 years ago that I used to
cross-build arm picobsd images for a gumstix platform on a i386 host.
I don't know if the diff will apply cleanly anymore but here it is in
anyway.
--- a/release/picobsd/build/Makefile.conf
+++ b/release/picobsd/build/Makefile.conf
@@
On 4 January 2012 20:53, Jacques Fourie jacques.fou...@gmail.com wrote:
I've posted a diff to -arm about 2 years ago that I used to
cross-build arm picobsd images for a gumstix platform on a i386 host.
I don't know if the diff will apply cleanly anymore but here it is in
anyway.
Hi,
I've
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4 January 2012 20:53, Jacques Fourie jacques.fou...@gmail.com wrote:
I've posted a diff to -arm about 2 years ago that I used to
cross-build arm picobsd images for a gumstix platform on a i386 host.
I don't know if the
Hi,
I'm trying to slim down the freebsd kernel to fit on some devices with
4MB of flash.
Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code required.
It turns out I can just build a kernel with those two disabled.
Would it be possible to remove them from standard and make them
51 matches
Mail list logo
