TB --- 2014-04-24 13:09:23 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-24 13:09:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2014
Fixed by r264883 sorry for the breakage.
- Original Message -
From: "FreeBSD Tinderbox"
To: "FreeBSD Tinderbox" ; ;
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:48 PM
Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64
TB --- 2014-04-24 13:09:23 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.c
Hi,
I can't build current on i386 (last tried revision is 264886) for couple
of days. Every time trying to build with making `make clean` and rm'ing
/usr/obj first.
The first error is appearing when building MCAsmBackend.cpp:
"""
/../contrib/llvm/lib/MC/MCAsmBackend.cpp -o MCAsmBackend.o
In f
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion of
software.
Is FreeBSD going to support the efford
On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion of
softwa
On 24 Apr 2014, at 19:05, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> I can't build current on i386 (last tried revision is 264886) for couple of
> days. Every time trying to build with making `make clean` and rm'ing /usr/obj
> first.
>
> The first error is appearing when building MCAsmBackend.cpp:
> """
> /
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
>> LibreSSL. As
>> OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
>> OpenSSL, I'd
>> like
On 04/24/14 17:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation,
called LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the
code of OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in F
On 24 Apr 2014, at 22:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
> It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
> LibreSSL. As
> OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
> OpenSSL, I'd
> like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical porti
There is info feed also
http://opensslrampage.org/
Too early to say what will come out of it, but has some
promising qualities certainly.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/OpenSSL-vs-LibreSSL-OpenBSD-tp5906272p5906317.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mail
On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-current.
>
> I try to trim my NanoBSD install as much as possible without going to add
> "rm /usr/bin/as" to customization steps (ok, I remove /usr/include and
> /usr/lib/*.a, but it I don't want cherry-pick binaries).
>
> So
On Apr 24, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 24 Apr 2014, at 22:35, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
>> LibreSSL. As
>> OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
>> OpenSSL, I'd
>> like
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:05:40PM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> > We need to discuss the use of comic sans font across our web properties
> > first.
> >
> > -Alfred
>
> You, sir, win 2 internets.
>
> - Justin
seconded.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
