Re: Current hangs in reboot

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:35:52PM +0200, Taavi Talvik wrote: Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...stopped Turning off ACPI makes it reboot. Thanks for suggestion Gerrit! You're welcome. I just noticed I forgot to include the mailinglist in my answers to you. :)

Re: USB and Kodak DC4800 Camera

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:11:16PM +0100, Michael Class wrote: I am facing a problem that my Kodak DC4800 Camera is not recognized by a current FreeBSD-current system (I do not have release systems around, so I can not test aginst them, but I suspect that it would not work their either)

Re: VIA C3

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:33:56PM -0700, David Yeske wrote: Anyone have a VIA C3? I'm running FreeBSD current on one and I don't see any gcc flags for the VIA C3. I think it has MMX and 3dnow, but it does not have SSE? Up to the Ezra kernel the C3 doesn't suppoert SSE. Only the newest

Re: VIA C3

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:44:17AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote: I have an Ezra or an Ezra-T core (the only difference is Tualatin sp compatibility), and it produces an Unknown. If you have a 'Samuel2' core, then you have a Samuel2 core. It's neither Ezra nor Ezra-T -- those two are the

Re: VIA C3

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:10:49AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote: Well, all I can say is, that I bought it as Ezra and there is Ezra printed on it. FreeBSD identifies it as Samuel2, though. And I bought my Ezra as a Nehemiah. [...] So maybe they do have a way to distinguish the chips. Dunno

Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

Hi all, I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back quickly and bg fsck worked fine, except for one. I had created a large (50GB) /export

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back quickly and bg fsck worked fine,

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:22:10PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: I've been trying to reproduce this bug on my desktop. This machine has 2 80gb disks, one of which is dedicated with one slice. So far, after 8 hard resets, I haven't had any problem with either the machine or bgfsck

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:23:08PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: 47105 seems to be slightly different from what I saw, because my machine never paniced; the fsck just hung forever. It depends. My machine hangs, there's no panic. Yes, I overlooked that in the PR when I read it first. Mine was

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:34:25PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: Following reports of problems with bgfsck during the 5.0-RC series, and prior to the release, I spent some time adding hard disks to machines, resetting without clean shutdowns, and then interrupting background fscks, piles of

Re: Does bg fsck have problems with large filesystems?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:31:42PM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote: I've been trying to reproduce this bug on my desktop. This machine has 2 80gb disks, one of which is dedicated with one slice. So far, after 8 hard resets, I haven't had any problem with either the machine or bgfsck hanging

Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?

On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:06:45 +0400 Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote about Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?: GS The pf mailing list is about a dozen of active people. Yes, they are GS vocal on the new syntax. But there also exist a large number of common GS

Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer

On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:24:20 -0800 Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote about Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer: FC Or, does anyone have instructions on how to convert the ISO images FC into memstick images? Preferably using a Linux station, not a FreeBSD FC station.

Re: Anybody using gp driver?

On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 02:10:22PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: I'm wondering if anybody is using, or even able to use, the gpib driver. It uses the old ISA shims, and is one of the drivers that no one has acked working in when I ask about the old isa shim drivers. I always wanted to use it.

Re: Anybody using gp driver?

On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:48:59AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : Oops, is it /that/ bad? I can't convince myself that it would have any chance of working. That's why I asked. Hm, doesn't sound very promising then. :) : Well, as I said above: I'm not using it so far, but given some time I

Re: Anybody using gp driver?

On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:03:22PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: BTW: Are there more people around (except for you and me :-) who would like to see decent gpib-support in FreeBSD? Yes, me. I might have guessed it. Is there anything around FreeBSD you're not working with or on? ;-) I'm

Re: Anybody using gp driver?

On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:17:54AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/gpib.Sep22b.tar.gz (Galbraith's old site is dead.) Just FYI, so that others can avoid the inconvenience of doing the same search. Thanks! cu Gerrit --

Fw: Re: compiling on nfs directories

Gerrit Begin forwarded message: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:27:56 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca To: Gerrit Kühn gerrit.ku...@aei.mpg.de Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compiling on nfs directories [...] I'm not a ZFS guy, but I thought there was a recent ZFS patch

Re: why 100 packages are evil

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:52:32 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote about Re: why 100 packages are evil: MS> > Is freebsd-update going away as result of the new packaging ? > Yes. It will be replaced by 'pkg upgrade' -- as far as I know, that's > the plan for 11.0-RELEASE. Hm... I

Re: Heads up

On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:19:23 -0600 Warner Losh wrote about Re: Heads up: WL> Crucial/Micron M500 (all firmware prior to MU07) I have a couple of these. Where can I get the latest firmware? On http://www.crucial.com/usa/en/support-ssd they offer only MU05?! cu Gerrit

Re: noatime on ufs2

Am Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:14:16 +0100 schrieb "Patrick M. Hausen" : > That number at first looks like a serious load on the write endurance > of your SSD. Then, doing the math it turns out it's absolutely > ridiculous. > > 100 kB/s sums up to 8,640 GB/day (in decimal units). Even the small > SSDs