Re: error: ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted

2003-08-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 13:41:17 -0500, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting a consistent error with cvsup from this morning during make installworld snip ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted snip I've done make cleandir and re-cvsup etc. Same error. amd 2400 asus mb. running

Re: recover superblock

2003-08-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:26:11 +0200, Thomas Gutzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just lost all of my filesystems on my 5.1 box. I was running mnogosearch's indexer on my website while several errors occured. I guess there were 320 of these errors, cause the last message was last message

Re: recover superblock

2003-08-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 15:53:26 -0400 (EDT), Andre Guibert de Bruet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:26:11 +0200, Thomas Gutzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have lost over 1,000 to 2,000 emails like three times when the Nvidia driver

Re: Release Engineering Status Report

2003-09-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:57:58 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there a specific problem with OpenSSH 3.5 which requires an update to 3.6.1? Or do you just want me to update it to make the numbers look pretty on your screen?

Yesterday -CURRENT doesn't work on my CD-RW and SCSI HD (Re: )

2003-09-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Err, for some reason the email client ate my subject.. On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night, I CVSup'ed and did the buildworld/kernel stuff. Then, I reboot and I get the busy signal like forever, it looks like the HD is spinning forever

Re:

2003-09-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night, I CVSup'ed and did the buildworld/kernel stuff. Then, I reboot and I get the busy signal like forever, it looks like the HD is spinning forever for no reason. Also, the ATAng can't find my Teac CD-RW

Re: Yesterday -CURRENT doesn't work on my CD-RW and SCSI HD (Re: )

2003-09-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:27:28 -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night, I CVSup'ed and did the buildworld/kernel stuff. Then, I reboot and I get the busy signal like forever, it looks like

Re:

2003-09-19 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Nevermind, I switched from slave to master of CD-RW; it boots just fine and function fine too. No more weird busy signal at all the time. Time to use my own kernel config.. Cheers, Mezz On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night, I CVSup'ed and did

Re: ports and -current

2003-09-20 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:14:07 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, for weeks now I couldn't compile (almost) any port. It seems that ports aren't tested against -current. Is that true? Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are easy to fix

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:14:25 +0200, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:10:35 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:14:25 +0200, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:56:50 +0200, Michael Nottebrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer in 5.x.. :-( Note that, I only check in the 5.x's NOTES You didn't check in the right

Re: VIA ACPI power management controller

2003-06-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:56:15 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:56:50 +0200, Michael Nottebrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2003 20:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer in 5.x

Re: Regression: Playing QT files from mplayer stopped working in 5.1

2003-06-07 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:28:29 +0200, Arjan van Leeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Since a short time (don't know exactly when it happened) it's not possible anymore to play Quicktime files (.mov) with mplayer on 5.1- CURRENT. It has to be a change in -CURRENT, I haven't updated mplayer. When

libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

2003-06-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it doesn't work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong? # cat /etc/libmap.conf libc_r.so.5 libthr.so.1 libc_r.so libthr.so [/usr/X11R6/bin/ggv] libc_r.so.5

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

2003-06-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:01:52 -0700, David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr, but it doesn't work as expect.. Maybe, I must have done something wrong? Make sure that you

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

2003-06-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:04:11 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:01:52 -0700, David P. Reese Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:50:00PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I am trying to get ggv link against libc_r instead libthr

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

2003-06-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 22:51:59 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: It seems like the [/path/to/exec] and [exec] don't work? ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/libmap-test.tar Untar that in src/libexec/rtld-elf/ cd test/ make ./test-libmap

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

2003-06-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:54:07 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: # ./test-libmap /usr/X11R6/bin/ggv libc_r.so.5 Lookup of libc_r.so.5 for /usr/X11R6/bin/ggv - libc_r.so.5

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

2003-06-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:05:26 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:54:07 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: # ./test-libmap /usr/X11R6/bin/ggv libc_r.so.5 Lookup

Re: libmap.conf has the bug or not work correct?

2003-06-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:55:35 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote: Nevermind, I think you are right it does work. Because, I did the test on mplayer by install it. It does link mplayer to libc_r correct, while not ggv. Looks like I

Buildworld failed by binutils/bfd/targets.c:1092..

2003-06-09 Thread Jeremy Messenger
I just CVSup'ed at the phk's lastest committed on UPDATING/CDD stuff. I did the buildworld and it has been failed. == /usr/src/contrib/binutils/bfd/targets.c -o targets.o In file included from /usr/src/contrib/binutils/bfd/targets.c:1092: targmatch.h:7:1: null

Re: Nvidia driver problems

2003-06-09 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On 09 Jun 2003 23:22:55 +0200, Sascha Holzleiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, just got these messages with a today -CURRENT and the nvidia driver compiled with FREEBSD_AGP: snip Is this just a the nvidia driver isn't officially for the 5.x series issue or shouldn't this happen at all? If I

Re: Buildworld failed by binutils/bfd/targets.c:1092..

2003-06-09 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:45:01 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:18:46PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: I just CVSup'ed at the phk's lastest committed on UPDATING/CDD stuff. I ^^^I mean, CCD.. did

Re: Interest in nvidia-driver debugging on 5-*

2003-06-12 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On 13 Jun 2003 05:11:34 +, Samy Al Bahra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I believe the fix is as simple as saving and restoring %gs in the nVidia driver, and/or not letting the nVidia use %gs at all (segment registers generally belong to the OS, in any case, and stealing a CPU register of any

Re: Buildworld failing in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd

2003-06-13 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On 13 Jun 2003 15:42:20 -0400, Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list, I'm sure I've done something naughty as I've been seeing errors for a few days, but I've done some troubleshooting and I can't seem to find the place I shot myself in the foot. My system is current, and about a week old

Re: Xft-2.1.2 fails to build under 5.1 release

2003-06-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On 17 Jun 2003 12:31:58 -0700, Eli K. Breen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Xft-2.1.2 fails to build under 5.1 release - Any hints or should I try and get a hold of the Xft port maintainer? I installed Xft/XFree86-4 on the very fresh 5.1-CURRENT (/usr/local/ and /usr/X11R6/ were empty) and they built

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c (fwd)

2003-06-18 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:45:18 -0400 (EDT), Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My last few commits, including this one, went a long way towards improving ULE's interactive responsiveness under heavy load. I was just able to do a make -j32 of my kernel while browsing the web with mozilla and

Re: buildworld failure - BFD - targmatch.h

2003-06-19 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:05:38 -0400, Michael W. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello -CURRENT, nice to meet you. My name is Michael Oliver, and I have been running FreeBSD for a few years, and am a BIG fan. I have recently decided to run -CURRENT on my laptop (Gateway SOLO-9300cl), and on my

Re: sysutils/daemontools can't be install by NFS mount?

2003-07-09 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:46:37 +0300, Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:30:50AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: Here's how I install sysutils/daemontools folowing: client# mount server:/usr/ports /usr/ports client# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/daemontools client# make

Re: gcc-3.3 issues

2003-07-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On 17 Jul 2003 22:07:37 +0200, Peter Kadau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! s/gcc-3.3/ports/ issues and we are in agreement. alright, `port compile issues raised with the adoption of gcc-3.3' Patches to fix broken ports are welcome. Looking at AbiWord2 I suspect this has to be pushed upstream in

Re: gcc-3.3 issues

2003-07-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On 17 Jul 2003 22:47:02 +0200, Peter Kadau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! Sorry for that... That was my pre-get-rid-of-g++-workaround - how embarrassing ! Alexander pointed out in private (thank you), that this was a failure. I am willing to test the patches if one of you have any. Try that

Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with newgcc)

2003-07-18 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:36:50 +0200, Matthias Schuendehuette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:14, David O'Brien wrote: I'm willing to commit it as such, but I'd like to hear more people's opinion. What I found so far: - gvim 6.2.21 works under 'twm' - gvim 6.2.21 works under

Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-07-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:53:21 -0400, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote: Hi, I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I seem to have memory mangament problems. The BIOS indicates I have 160, so does the BSD bootstrap program. When I launch GNOME

Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-07-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:46:12 -0400, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:53:21 -0400, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote: Hi, I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I seem to have memory

Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with newgcc)

2003-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Now, it has been fixed today with the new 6.2.040 patch. Cheers, Mezz On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:24:30 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:36:50 +0200, Matthias Schuendehuette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 17 July 2003 08:14, David O'Brien wrote: I'm

Re: CVSUP problems

2003-07-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:57:45 -0700 (PDT), Rus Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I'm trying to pull the 5.1 source with the following cvsup file *default host=cvsup8.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5 *default compress src-all Doing cvsup it

Re: CVSUP problems

2003-07-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT), Rus Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kind of.. :-) Where did you learn that 5.x already have the -STABLE branch? We only have -RELEASE and -CURRENT branches right now, but should have - STABLE branch after 5.2 released. So CURRENT_5? No, if you want

Re: [RFT] Automatic load of USB kernel modules

2011-06-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2011 00:15:17 Warner Losh wrote: Hey Hans, Given that all this stuff is really new and shiny, and we're really close to the feature freeze,  I'm not sure enabling it by default is the prudent

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT

2012-06-27 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 06/27/2012 07:30 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: --- Mer 27/6/12, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org ha scritto: ... I believe we do not make this kind of work with any vendor code that is being updated in the base; Au

Re: [HEADSUP CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com wrote: On 2012-Jul-12 10:01:10 +, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: What is pkg --- pkg is a new package manager for FreeBSD. It is designed as a replacement for the pkg_* tools, and as a full featured binary

Re: [HEADSUP CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote: On 16/07/2012 05:22, Jeremy Messenger wrote: It's one of reason why I do not agree to remove the shared library version from the LIB_DEPENDS, so that way in future someone can add support in the package to check

Is the :u behaves normal or not (a bug) in the make?

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Hello all, While I was working on add the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk. I got a bug where it will running some dependencies got duplicate. Thanks to the make(1) that shows me the :u feature to get rid of the duplicates. But it doesn't exactly help unless I use the :O to get the words

Re: Is the :u behaves normal or not (a bug) in the make?

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jeremy Messenger mezz.free...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, While I was working on add the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk. I got a bug where it will running some dependencies got duplicate. Thanks to the make(1) that shows me the :u feature to get rid

Re: Is the :u behaves normal or not (a bug) in the make?

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Olli Hauer oha...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-07-26 22:11, Jeremy Messenger wrote: Hello all, While I was working on add the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk. I got a bug where it will running some dependencies got duplicate. Thanks to the make(1

Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation...

2012-08-23 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote: On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of /var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a database into the port

Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th

2012-09-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: snip Can you, please, read what I wrote ? Fixing _ports_ to compile with clang is plain wrong. Upstream developers use gcc almost always for development and testing. Establishing another constant cost on the

Re: openjdk6 broken on current

2013-05-08 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote: Can SOMEONE please look at this? I have a real need to get java back on my -CURRENT server soon. Roll back your -CURRENT and you will have your server running already. Thanks! On 2013-05-07 10:18, Alexander Yerenkow

Re: opendchub compile problem

2003-11-02 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 01:13:54 +0100, Sebastijan Vacun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helo! I wanna install opendchub on my FreeBSD server. My system is: 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD I have installed perl-5.6.1_14. But when I want to make net/opendchub I got this:

Re: buildworld failure: don't know how to make thr_atfork.c

2003-11-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:17:05 +1030, Alex Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CVSup'd today [Wed Nov 5 17:15:14 CST 2003] and buildworld fails. $ make buildworld . snip === lib/libpthread make: don't know how to make thr_atfork.c. Stop *** Error code 2 snip It's already fixed, Daniel has

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:10:36 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote: Eirik Oeverby wrote: Just for those interested: I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth

Re: burncd block size

2003-11-07 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:10:40 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been having a variety of problems burning CDs with atang: - burncd consistently failing in exactly the same spot in the ISO, and reporting only wrote 0 of 32768 bytes: Unknown error: 0 - burncd failing

Re: burncd block size

2003-11-07 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:28:42 +0100 (CET), Soren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:10:40 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been having a variety of problems burning CDs with atang: - burncd consistently failing

Re: burncd block size

2003-11-07 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:28:42 +0100 (CET), Soren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:10:40 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been having a variety of problems burning CDs with atang: - burncd consistently failing

Re: ALTQ support

2003-11-09 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:29:34 +0800, Michael Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Sir, I don't know if I am posting this question to a wrong mailing list. I am looking for a solution to make QoS possible on my FreeBSD box. After searching for the internet, I found that there is a software called

Re: GNOME users should recompile gnomevfs2 after today update

2003-11-12 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 04:54:21 -0800, walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that the new statfs changes cause nautilus to crash on startup. The fix is to recompile/reinstall devel/gnomevfs2. Thanks for let us know and add CC'ing to freebsd-gnome list.. Cheers, Mezz -- bsdforums.org 's moderator,

Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure

2003-11-14 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:46:19 +0100, Sascha Holzleiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 22:46, Bruce Cran wrote: Either the new statfs, or something in a recent change in -CURRENT (since last week), has broken the nvidia driver. I've been using it now for over half a year with no

Re: licq KSE

2003-12-02 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:58:07 -0500 (EST), Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel Eischen wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Motin wrote: If I use libkse I get: kernel: Warning: pid 25341 used static ldt allocation.