On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 04:00:35PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, November 21, 2014 08:39:17 PM Roman Divacky wrote:
> > Sure thing. Reload the patch from the same url.
> >
> > http://rys.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2.diet.patch
>
> Thanks. I haven't run tested it, but I'm ok with i
On Friday, November 21, 2014 08:39:17 PM Roman Divacky wrote:
> Sure thing. Reload the patch from the same url.
>
> http://rys.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2.diet.patch
Thanks. I haven't run tested it, but I'm ok with it otherwise.
--
John Baldwin
___
Sure thing. Reload the patch from the same url.
http://rys.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2.diet.patch
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:16:58AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, November 21, 2014 01:56:32 PM Roman Divacky wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > In an effort to help import clang3.5 I looked
On Friday, November 21, 2014 01:56:32 PM Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In an effort to help import clang3.5 I looked at squeezing a few more bytes
> from boot2.
>
>
> http://rys.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2.diet.patch
>
>
> Please test and review the patch. It survived my qemu boot a
Fir the clang 3.4 import, I had some patches (that never got applied), which
used clang -O0 and then opt with some custom optimisation order to get a
reasonable size saving. It might be worth trying that, so that future changes
to the default optimisation order don't make things worse again.
D
Hi all!
In an effort to help import clang3.5 I looked at squeezing a few more bytes
from boot2.
http://rys.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2.diet.patch
Please test and review the patch. It survived my qemu boot attempt so it's
not completely broken. But I would like to have some more testing a
