Re: Another tweak to "burncd msinfo"

2002-01-05 Thread Stephen McKay
On Saturday, 5th January 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: >I forgot to say that I already committed the change to current... :-) I try to keep up with -current, but that's too current for me! I'll hassle the REs tomorrow about permission to merge. Thanks, Stephen. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM

Re: Another tweak to "burncd msinfo"

2002-01-05 Thread Stephen McKay
On Saturday, 5th January 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: >It seems Stephen McKay wrote: >> >> Are these changes intended for 4.5? I'm hoping the small change I >> proposed would be accepted into 4.5, before anybody starts using >> "burncd msinfo" in practice. I think this is sensible, even if >> a

Re: Another tweak to "burncd msinfo"

2002-01-05 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Stephen McKay wrote: > > > > Are these changes intended for 4.5? I'm hoping the small change I > > proposed would be accepted into 4.5, before anybody starts using > > "burncd msinfo" in practice. I think this is sensible, even if > > a much improved bur

Re: Another tweak to "burncd msinfo"

2002-01-05 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Stephen McKay wrote: > > Are these changes intended for 4.5? I'm hoping the small change I > proposed would be accepted into 4.5, before anybody starts using > "burncd msinfo" in practice. I think this is sensible, even if > a much improved burncd is scheduled for 4.6. You should ask

Re: Another tweak to "burncd msinfo"

2002-01-05 Thread Stephen McKay
On Saturday, 5th January 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: >It seems Stephen McKay wrote: >> Now that "burncd msinfo" returns the correct values I noticed another small >> problem: it displays the result on stderr instead of stdout. > >Hmm, that was intentional... Could you explain why? The most obvio

Re: Another tweak to "burncd msinfo"

2002-01-05 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Stephen McKay wrote: > Now that "burncd msinfo" returns the correct values I noticed another small > problem: it displays the result on stderr instead of stdout. Hmm, that was intentional... > Since very few people (nobody?) would be using this option yet because > of the previous probl

Another tweak to "burncd msinfo"

2002-01-05 Thread Stephen McKay
Now that "burncd msinfo" returns the correct values I noticed another small problem: it displays the result on stderr instead of stdout. Since very few people (nobody?) would be using this option yet because of the previous problem, it seems like nobody would be adversely affected by changing the