Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-16 Thread Wes Peters
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > > > I'd go along with that. Wh

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-15 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:21:54PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-15 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > I'd go along with that. What do the other committers think? I th

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-15 Thread Amancio Hasty
> Darren Reed wrote: > > > > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > > > > > I'd go along with tha

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-15 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Darren Reed wrote: > > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > > > I'd go along with that. What do th

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 15 May 2000 at 13:48:19 +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > In some email I received from Greg Lehey, sie wrote: >> On Sunday, 14 May 2000 at 23:21:21 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >>> On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >>> Maybe the comitters ought to take

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Kent Hauser
Hi all, I think I might have an even better solution. Continue passing the pointy hat around & I'll buy the committer's keg at the next BSDcon. I for one appreciate the exceptional funcitionality of FreeBSD (especially the IPSec support). And also, if I buy the key, maybe I'll also be invited. R

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Darren Reed
In some email I received from Greg Lehey, sie wrote: > On Sunday, 14 May 2000 at 23:21:21 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > >> > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > contribute $5 t

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 14 May 2000 at 23:21:21 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >> > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it >

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:23:07PM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) >>

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Tim Vanderhoek
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 11:06:50AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes: > : > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > : > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > : > all come due at the

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 10:19:21AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > I'd go along with that. What do the other committers think? Can I drink pop instead? I'm underage, and I don't like alcohol anyway. :) -- Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-14 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes: : > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and : > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it : > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) : : I'd go along wit

Re: Can we please have a current that compiles?

2000-05-13 Thread Doug Barton
Mike Nowlin wrote: > > > I'd just seen a series of bad commits whose corrections weren't caught by the > > frequency of my cvs updates I guees. Vinum is compiling now, and kernels with > > IPSEC and INETV6 now link, it's just that last night's problems with more got > > me a little ticked off. >

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-13 Thread John Polstra
> > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > > > I'd go along with that. What do the other committers th

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-13 Thread Darren Reed
In some email I received from Greg Lehey, sie wrote: > On Saturday, 13 May 2000 at 9:53:40 -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote: > > On Fri, 12 May 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote: > > > >> For the past few days, current has not compiled, owing to problems (in no > >> particular order) with more, vinum and

Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

2000-05-13 Thread Greg Lehey
On Saturday, 13 May 2000 at 9:53:40 -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote: > On Fri, 12 May 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote: > >> For the past few days, current has not compiled, owing to problems (in no >> particular order) with more, vinum and various INET options in the GENERIC >> kernel. Can people plea

Re: Can we please have a current that compiles?

2000-05-13 Thread Brian W. Buchanan
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote: > For the past few days, current has not compiled, owing to problems (in no > particular order) with more, vinum and various INET options in the GENERIC > kernel. Can people please check things before they commit them? I like a > working compile at l

Re: Can we please have a current that compiles?

2000-05-12 Thread Mike Nowlin
> I'd just seen a series of bad commits whose corrections weren't caught by the > frequency of my cvs updates I guees. Vinum is compiling now, and kernels with > IPSEC and INETV6 now link, it's just that last night's problems with more got > me a little ticked off. > > cc: main.c: No such file

Re: Can we please have a current that compiles?

2000-05-12 Thread Stephen Hocking
> This is the first I've heard of a problem in Vinum. > > > Can people please check things before they commit them? I like a > > working compile at least *once* a week. > > I'm wondering if you haven't had some other problem. I haven't heard > anybody else with problems. > I have a number of

Re: Can we please have a current that compiles?

2000-05-12 Thread Greg Lehey
On Friday, 12 May 2000 at 23:35:09 +0800, Stephen Hocking wrote: > For the past few days, current has not compiled, owing to problems (in no > particular order) with more, vinum and various INET options in the GENERIC > kernel. This is the first I've heard of a problem in Vinum. > Can people ple

Can we please have a current that compiles?

2000-05-12 Thread Stephen Hocking
For the past few days, current has not compiled, owing to problems (in no particular order) with more, vinum and various INET options in the GENERIC kernel. Can people please check things before they commit them? I like a working compile at least *once* a week. Stephen -- The views