Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
} On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:28:03PM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
}
} > ldd was telling me that it had both libc.so.3 and libc.so.5 which seemed
} > very bad to me. When I recomipled LyX to see if that would fix things,
} > I noticed that ld was giving a
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:28:03PM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
> ldd was telling me that it had both libc.so.3 and libc.so.5 which seemed
> very bad to me. When I recomipled LyX to see if that would fix things,
> I noticed that ld was giving a warning about libc.so.3 and libc.so.5
> potential
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
} -On [20010127 22:30], Patrick Hartling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
} >Making a symlink from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 to /usr/lib/libc.so.3 seems to
} >have fixed my LyX problems. I'm guessing libc.so.5 and libc.so.3 were
} >causing conflicts, e
-On [20010127 22:30], Patrick Hartling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Making a symlink from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 to /usr/lib/libc.so.3 seems to
>have fixed my LyX problems. I'm guessing libc.so.5 and libc.so.3 were
>causing conflicts, especially with the recent changes to libc, but I'm no
>expert. Wh
Patrick Hartling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
} I just rebuilt my -current system yesterday, and now LyX is throwing up
} all over itself. It starts up fine, but if I try to load a document or
} create a new one, it immediately dumps core. The problem seems to be
} occuring the the xforms library
