from Niclas Zeising:
So now I wonder why I failed four times straight building current. One
definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a
different result.
Maybe the build host, 11.1-STABLE from July 30, 2017, was too old? I wouldn't
have thought it was too old.
On 2019-05-16 09:36, Thomas Mueller wrote:
from Niclas Zeising:
I run a build WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS, and that worked, on current, last weekend, if
that's what you're asking about.
This won't take away the need for llvm ports in certain ports builds, however,
such as firefox and mesa.
So now
from Niclas Zeising:
> I run a build WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS, and that worked, on current, last weekend, if
> that's what you're asking about.
> This won't take away the need for llvm ports in certain ports builds, however,
> such as firefox and mesa.
So now I wonder why I failed four times straight
On 2019-05-16 03:46, Thomas Mueller wrote:
In general, WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS controls the building of extra tools such
as a disassembler, and tools for working on clang itself such as bug
reporting tools. I don't have a really detailed answer because I've
never enabled the option. I've always
> In general, WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS controls the building of extra tools such
> as a disassembler, and tools for working on clang itself such as bug
> reporting tools. I don't have a really detailed answer because I've
> never enabled the option. I've always perceived it as being something
> most
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 23:23 +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> What do most FreeBSD users who rebuild system from source do
> regarding WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS in /etc/src.conf ?
>
> I have WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS=yes in /etc/src.conf and wonder if that
> could be screwing my build.
>
> Build seems to stumble
What do most FreeBSD users who rebuild system from source do regarding
WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS in /etc/src.conf ?
I have WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS=yes in /etc/src.conf and wonder if that could be
screwing my build.
Build seems to stumble on the llvm stuff, and llvm has really bloated in recent
times.
But
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 19:26 +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from tech-lists:
>
> > What do you do before buildworld?
>
>
> > I'll rm -rf /usr/obj and /var/cache/ccache [1], create them again,
> > then in
> > /usr/src I'll do this:
> > make -j32 cleanworld && make -j32 cleandir && make
from tech-lists:
> What do you do before buildworld?
> I'll rm -rf /usr/obj and /var/cache/ccache [1], create them again, then in
> /usr/src I'll do this:
> make -j32 cleanworld && make -j32 cleandir && make -j32 clean
> before make buildworld. it's probably overkill but it'll
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 06:46:04AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi Tom,
Are you using any nonstandard build options/modes?
Cheers!
-Enji
I don't think I am using any nonstandard build options/modes.
[...]
Build didn't even start when I had WITHOUT_MANCOMPRESS on.
Trouble occurs
> Hi Tom,
> Are you using any nonstandard build options/modes?
> Cheers!
> -Enji
I don't think I am using any nonstandard build options/modes.
/etc/src.conf is
WITHOUT_SVNLITE=yes
WITHOUT_PORTSNAP=yes
#WITHOUT_MANCOMPRESS=yes
#WITHOUT_DOCCOMPRESS=yes
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes
> On May 14, 2019, at 13:18, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> I have failed in three attempts over the past week to build FreeBSD-current
> amd64, error message is about the same each time.
>
> Build host uname -a shows
>
> FreeBSD amelia 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #4: Sun Jul 30 17:28:39 UTC
I have failed in three attempts over the past week to build FreeBSD-current
amd64, error message is about the same each time.
Build host uname -a shows
FreeBSD amelia 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #4: Sun Jul 30 17:28:39 UTC 2017
root@amelia2:/usr/obj/BETA1/usr/src11/sys/SANDY11NC amd64
13 matches
Mail list logo
