In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: I'm not happy about bumping every shared lib. Can you answer:
Nor am I.
: (1) does a ``make world'' will not work? Peter showed that we had no
: choice with libc due to the use of the host's existing install programs.
make world works.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:32:33AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> : > Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
> : > library versions.
> :
> : I haven't
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: > Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
: > library versions.
:
: I haven't tried to build -current for a few days now. Can you summerize
: what br
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
> library versions.
I haven't tried to build -current for a few days now. Can you summerize
what breakage you are seeing?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
> Please review this patch as I'd like to commit it soon. Also, I'm not
> 100% sure what to do about libdes.so.3, so if you have commments on
> that please let me know. Other than that, the patches should be close
> to commitable.
Now is the time to toss that into compat/
M
--
Mark Murray
W
[[ see end of message for major downer ]]
In message <01021423431802.00537@zoomer> "Danny J. Zerkel" writes:
: These lines come from Makefile.in in the vendor's source.
So are you saying it should be 3.1 instead so that the vendor can come
out with 4 later? It must be different than 3.
: But,
In message <01021422425001.00537@zoomer> "Danny J. Zerkel" writes:
: Is this going to cause any trouble down the road when the vendor bumps
: this? Do we need numeric compatibility? I'm just wondering, since the
: vendor's Makefile specifically says:
:
: VERSION = 2.10.0
: INTERFACE = 3
Vendor
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce Evans
writes:
: Please enclose small (< 100K) patches in the mail if you want them
: reviewed. They would have to be quoted to be reviewed...
OK. See attached. It seems to work for me.
: I think the impacted libraries can be found by compiling them with a
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
> library versions.
> http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/Pmaj
> it bumps all the major numbrs of all the impacted libraries that I
> could find on my system.
Please enclose small (< 100
Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major
library versions.
http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/Pmaj
it bumps all the major numbrs of all the impacted libraries that I
could find on my system.
Please review this patch as I'd like to commit it soon. Also, I'm not
100
10 matches
Mail list logo
